Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Does it really matter whether the earth is flat or globe shaped?
That is the primary subject matter here.
I don't see why it matters what mysterious phenomenon causes things to fall, however.
We want to know why things fall down for pretty much the same reason we are curious about the shape of the earth and all the other phenomena we observe.
I think it is just part of human nature to want to know.
I would like to know what force is moving the sun and moon in a circle above the earth? If "gravity doesn't exist" then what causes the sun follow the circular path that the flat earth model describes? I have not yet seen an explanation for this.
Unknown.
The usual FE answer. LOL
On the flat earth, the earth stands still and the sun and the moon move around the earth.
IF the earth WAS flat, that is. Paraphraising the old Will Rogers saying, "All I know is what I read in the flat earth wiki and that's my excuse for ignorance." There are quite a few things that are "unknown" to FE's.6
They are both 32 miles in diameter and 3,000 miles above the earth, just under the ice dome above the earth.
They don't collide with each other since " they wobble up and down."
I have also read that it has something to do with "the celestial gears."
On the round earth , the sun stands still and the earth moves around the sun and the moon moves around the earth . IF the earth IS round, that is.
Does it really matter whether the earth is flat or globe shaped?
I would like to know what force is moving the sun and moon in a circle above the earth? If "gravity doesn't exist" then what causes the sun follow the circular path that the flat earth model describes? I have not yet seen an explanation for this.
Keep in mind, we still haven't been shown any good evidence that it was a cover-up in the first place. Is the existence of a few lookalikes really the only "evidence" that you have? In the spirit of the season: Sad! Weak! Terrible!
But why wouldn't they just cover up that there was any failure at all?There's again no motive. Why would they fake a failure?
The motive is covering up a prop malfunction.
There's again no motive. Why would they fake a failure?
Bahahahaa! This makes zero since. So they are still operating under their old SSN? And that's not riskier than trying to get their name changed? Or did they get them a new SSN, forge a work history, family history, but decided "nah, let them keep their old name"? Lol.
Alright, that's all the stupid I can handle for today...
Which is why witness protection never bothered changing people's names either... oh wait. They did.
I noticed you deleted some stuff questioning Judith Reznik's past. In case you are still curious...
https://www.law.yale.edu/judith-resnik
https://www.law.yale.edu/system/files/documents/pdf/JResnik_Publications.pdf
"Hey, what should my back story be?"
"Pretend to be a CEO. That should be easy to get away with!"
"Brilliant!"
So good that they managed to pull off a massive conspiracy without being caught, but so incompetent that they would let the people whose deaths they faked just walk out and live public lives without changing their names or appearances? Lol, ok...
And "lie low"? Richard Scobee was a CEO even before disaster happened!
Right, and you are making that call based on a 30 year timelapse between the photos? Lol. You are seeing what you want to see.
Newspapers and TV's were a thing back then. This event was all over the news. Their names and faces were all over the news.
Like I said, you are seeing what you want to see. Their voices definitely don't sound alike. Finding a picture of them making a similar facial expression is not particularly convincing.
2 of them are pictures of their brothers. Lol. Surprise, surprise, brothers look alike.
The entire premise of this is ridiculous. Do you honestly believe that if NASA really faked their deaths, they would let them keep their old names? Or that they would make them assume the lives of their brothers without anyone noticing?
Mach's Principle explains that if the earth was still and the all the stars went around the Earth then the gravitational pull of the stars would pull the pendulum. As Mach said "The universe is not twice given, with an earth at rest and an earth in motion; but only once, with its relative motions alone determinable. It is accordingly, not permitted us to say how things would be if the earth did not rotate."
Amir D. Aczel, Pendulum: Léon Foucault and the triumph of science
Of course it works for RET. It works for RET on pretty much any day of the year and from pretty much any latitude. The problem is that it only works for FET on certain days of the year and from certain latitudes. Why is that?Are you saying that days of an equinox are the only days that the FE version of the experiment ever work properly? Why is it that the RE version works just fine on any day of the year?
Actually, the method described in the article works for RET as well. There are several ways to get your latitude, that is only one of them.
Are you saying that days of an equinox are the only days that the FE version of the experiment ever work properly? Why is it that the RE version works just fine on any day of the year?
Actually, the method described in the article works for RET as well. There are several ways to get your latitude, that is only one of them.
You are right, Tom, it does say equinox. I mis-applied the wiki latitude formula to a time that wasn't at equinox. My bad.
Can you please explain how it works on a flat earth? The north pole for example is 6215 statute miles from the equator. If the sun is 3,000 miles above the flat earth right over the equator on equinox then its elevation angle would be 25.8 degrees at the poles. Real observations show the sun to be right on the horizon during the equinox at both poles simultaneously.
How does the flat earth model explain it? How has TFES derived its latitude formula?
To me, the observations are explained by the spherical earht heliocentric model.