But is it okay for the teacher to point out that there's nothing wrong with the fact that Little Suzy has two daddies?
In the course of a day-to-day school activity concerning home life, no. If kids have more questions about it, the teacher refers the child to seek more information from home.
If Suzy is getting guff from the other kids about the nature of the parents, then the teacher needs to have a discussion with the parents of the kids bringing the guff. Other than that, no reason to discuss it all.
Or will the new bill discourage even that kind of discussion?
Yes, outside of the parameters presented.
That's what I think some people are afraid of with this. Other than that, I seriously doubt frank and detailed discourse about non-cisgender sexual practices was ever something anyone ever had to worry about in early grade school. It's just another case of Republicans raising the spectre of fear among their followers about a supposed problem that never really existed, like (shudder) critical race theory being taught in classrooms.
This isn't a party issue, it is a people issue.
It was an issue and people brought it before their elected representatives and the representatives acted upon it.
Simple, end of story.
Critical race theory is taught in public schools and you need to learn more about it.