41

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Orbiting International Space Station visible from Telescope

« on: March 08, 2018, 06:37:24 PM »

In order for a photo to explain something you need to understand what it shows. We need to make sure that you understand what is in that long-exposure photo of Polaris -- do you think all of those objects are actually orbiting Polaris?

What I see is Polaris is not orbiting any of the millions of them.
I would like to see a photo of the sun doing the same thing Polaris is doing.
If everything obits the sun then a simple photo should show it so just please show me the photo.

42

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Why is North Pole colder than tropical countries in summer?

« on: March 08, 2018, 05:34:21 PM »

If all the ice melted and the frost left the ground then the temperatures would be higher.
But the sun doesn't stay long enough to accomplish this before it leaves again for another cycle.

I live north and here is an experiment you can do to test this.
Summer solstice (June 21) is the longest day of the year.
So then lets add 50 days to the calendar post and pre date.
Pre = May 3
Post = August 10
Both dates have the exact same time of sun.
But August is much warm almost 100% of the time.
Why?
The sun on the trip in had to melt the snow and warm the land.
On the way out because there is no more snow to melt or frost still in the ground the sun now is giving thermal energy to be stored in the mass.

Its no different then jumping into a car when its below freezing temperatures.
If you rid it one block it remains cold. If you ride it 100 blocks it warms up.

43

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Orbiting International Space Station visible from Telescope

« on: March 08, 2018, 05:17:33 PM »

So no photo of your claim them?

44

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Orbiting International Space Station visible from Telescope

« on: March 07, 2018, 06:53:50 PM »

Well I am asking.

45

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Planar Warming

« on: March 07, 2018, 06:52:48 PM »

GLOBAL WARMING IS THE BIGGEST FRAUD IN HISTORY - Dan Pena

46

Science & Alternative Science / Re: What is 'alternative science'?

« on: March 07, 2018, 06:43:08 PM »

Its the new religion of the world.

47

Science & Alternative Science / Re: Bombs away

« on: March 07, 2018, 06:41:56 PM »

I had a fiends mother die

I hate it when my evil demon's mother dies 

48

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Orbiting International Space Station visible from Telescope

« on: March 07, 2018, 06:38:36 PM »

Celestial navigation
A variation on terrestrial celestial navigation was used to help orient the Apollo spacecraft en route to and from the Moon. To this day, space missions, such as the Mars Exploration Rover use star trackers to determine the attitude of the spacecraft. If one believes in the Mars space race.

Intercontinental ballistic missiles use celestial navigation to check and correct their course.

While celestial navigation is becoming increasingly redundant with the advent of inexpensive and highly accurate satellite navigation receivers its still used for compass calibration.

Star Trackers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_tracker
A star tracker is an optical device that measures the positions of stars using photocells or a camera.[1] As the positions of many stars have been measured by astronomers to a high degree of accuracy, a star tracker on a satellite or spacecraft may be used to determine the orientation (or attitude) of the spacecraft with respect to the stars.

If planet's obit the sun then there must be a photo of it like the planets and stars orbiting Polaris.
The sun is on the horizon but I don't see any thing orbiting it.

49

Flat Earth Theory / Re: I'm confused: How have we gotten it wrong for so long?

« on: March 06, 2018, 05:29:45 AM »

Antarctic Treat
Signed by then all.

50

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Gravity?

« on: March 06, 2018, 05:28:33 AM »

where are we accelerating upwards to? Where is the proof for this type of energy?

Polaris is the only star on course. If we are getting any closer? No.

51

Science & Alternative Science / Re: Bombs away

« on: March 06, 2018, 05:25:42 AM »

f you admit that an atomic bomb exists and you acknowledge E=mc^2 then you necessarily acknowledge the destructive power of a hydrogen bomb.

I agree.
Still can't test one in Antarctica.
I had a fiends mother die from watching the bombs in Vegas being tested. They would go out partying watching the blasts and she died of a rare radiation cancer. She was a Vegas show girl in the 60's.

52

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Orbiting International Space Station visible from Telescope

« on: March 06, 2018, 05:16:45 AM »

All satellites use Polaris as there center.
They do not use earth.

Everything obits around Polaris.
Everything. Every star, moon, planet, web site, turd, liberal, etc.

Its easy to make something obit when everything orbits. Just put it up there and it will obit.

Why do people comment that FE don't believe in satellites?
Some do and some don't.

Hard to doubt them when you can see them but hey, 2 pac still plays concerts right?

If there is a dome then what else is a satellite to do?
How many satellites drifted off course into outer space?
Not one ever.

Why when the RE moves at ridiculous speeds is there no drag on the dark side of earth?
We learn that the earth is moving about our sun in a very nearly circular orbit. It covers this route at a speed of nearly 30 kilometers per second, or 67,000 miles per hour.

A satellite is at its outer most limits with just enough energy to keep orbit for decades around earth but in that sensitive environment has no impact from being in front of an object that traveling at thousands of a miles per hours compared to being at the tail of the object traveling thousands of miles per hours.

That does not happen in real life. All you have to do to prove it is ride in a roller coaster in the front seat and then do the same ride in the back set. We have the same gravity with different g force. Why doesn't that happen on a RE with satellites?

I believe a true FE map can be draw using the satellites imagines they give.
And yes I don't think there is a true flat earth map or any for that matter. Well there is one or two but its in the bottom of the Vatican library. Thank you book burning days. Vatican also has the best telescope on the planet yet they give zero info out.

If one took the time and marked the orbital path of a satellite and when it crosses over a land mass on the RE model and then transferred the info to a FE map and rewrote the FE boundaries as a orbital path on a FE map then I think we would have an accurate map.

FE or RE I don't care, I just want the truth.

53

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Orbiting International Space Station visible from Telescope

« on: March 05, 2018, 06:36:59 PM »

Put the satellites path on a FE map and they to go around in big circles.

54

Technology & Information / Compressed air or liquid fuel (Jet engine)

« on: March 04, 2018, 08:42:17 PM »

Came across a new one even for me.

I was watching a video about compressing nitrogen as fuel, the one below.
Which took me down the rabbits hole and found more interesting things.

Gas-O-Line is a hoax, nitrogen rich air and compressed air is the real fuel

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSlRdML6cw0

Busting Air Travel Wide Open, compressed air is used not liquid fuel - Chemtrails a HOAX

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEF7C7h6iA0

55

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Scientific proof??

« on: March 03, 2018, 07:34:40 PM »

Stitched together high altitude balloon footage ..

56

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Scientific proof??

« on: March 03, 2018, 07:28:33 PM »

Flat Earth ... More Curve than you can Handle

57

Flat Earth Investigations / Re: Antarctica pictures.

« on: March 03, 2018, 04:57:57 PM »

58

Flat Earth Investigations / Re: Antarctica pictures.

« on: March 03, 2018, 04:49:38 PM »

59

Flat Earth Investigations / Re: Antarctica pictures.

« on: March 03, 2018, 04:49:09 PM »

60

Flat Earth Investigations / Re: Antarctica pictures.

« on: March 03, 2018, 04:48:35 PM »

These are amazing photos, but I guess its hard to take a bad picture when your in Antartica.
What's he using for glass? And don't say P900 cause I won't believe you.

Bro used his cell phone and a normal cheap camera.
I have blurry ones but why post them?