Judge Andrew Napolitano warns "She should be terrified of the fact that he’s been granted immunity," adding that "they would not be immunizing him and thereby inducing him to spill his guts unless they wanted to indict someone."
Napolitano argued that the revelation that former Clinton aide Bryan Pagliano, who set up Clinton’s private email server in 2009, is reportedly being offered immunity means he will likely be called to testify against someone much higher on the “totem pole.”
Pagliano will likely be asked how he was able to “migrate a State Department secure system onto her private server.” He then presented this theoretical question: “Mr. Pagliano, did Mrs. Clinton give you her personal Secretary of State password to enable you to do that?”
“If he answers, ‘yes,’ we have an indictment for misconduct in office as well as espionage. She should be terrified of the fact that he’s been granted immunity,” Napolitano added.
The Judge explained that only a federal judge can grant immunity and will only do so if a sitting jury is ready to hear testimony from the “immunized person,” suggesting the investigation is well on its way to a possible indictment.
“We also know they are going to seek someone’s indictment, because they would not be immunizing him and thereby inducing him to spill his guts unless they wanted to indict someone,” he said.
Other officials have a different view.
A former State Department inspector general who served in that capacity from 2005 to 2008 said Hillary Clinton will never be indicted for her email server scandal because A, the State Department itself would be implicated and B, she’s being shielded from prosecution by four very powerful Democratic Party women.
Those women, he said, were Assistant Attorney General Leslie Caldwell, the head of the criminal division at the department, Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, Attorney General Loretta Lynch and even White House aide Valerie Jarrett.
Krongard said the case would likely fade, but even if those four women took the referral, the most they would pursue would be a plea-bargain for misdemeanor counts, the New York Post reported.
Howard Krongard, in an interview with the New York Post, said Clinton was never actually assigned a state.gov email address, and that in itself shows the department was aware and at least tacitly approving of her private email system.
Krongard also said it was highly unusual for the inspector general of State position to remain unfilled for the entire tenure of Clinton’s term at the department, from 2009 to 2013.
“This is a major gap,” he said. “In fact, it’s without precedent. It’s the longest period any department has gone without an IG.”
One role of an inspector general is to ensure government entities aren’t committing fraud, waste and abuse; another, however, is to make sure government officials aren’t violating communications security provisions.
“It’s clear she did not want to be subject to internal investigations,” Krongard said, the New York Post reported.
Trump has hinted that Clinton might be criminally indicted, and it is safe to speculate that he is not pulling this out of nowhere, but rather that he is hearing it first hand from powerful people in the USDOJ and the FBI.
http://www.unz.com/anapolitano/hillary-clintons-false-hopes/Cruz and Rubio must address now the economic issues in a more direct way, in order to win more voters to their side.
Trump was not able to address any of the accusations that were brought to him, during the Detroit debate; he even refused to release the New York Times tapes to the public.
It is obvious that a civil war is coming to the United States (the catalyst will be a stock market collapse; this time around the Fed will not save Wall Street).
Will this revolution start in the northern states or in the southern states? That is, at the time this civil war breaks out, will the President be a Democrat or a Republican?