1

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: Today at 06:48:39 PM »

honk still claiming Clinton to be a centrist.

Wow.

No one is fooled by the approach of the ilk claiming Trump to be absolutely terrible, all the while he is continuing the US down the path of the exact things you totalitarians desire.

The guy is a lifelong liberal.

2

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: Today at 12:49:53 PM »

Claiming acts of driving and tax payments are somehow analogous to acts of banging an intern at the office

That's not what I said...

No, that is exactly what you said.

One can only take that you were placing yourself in Clinton's shoes by stating whether your driving habits or an honest or dishonest filing of taxes was a gauge of your political idealogy. First of all, you are nothing at all similar to Clinton in terms of position, power, or fame. B, nobody gives flying fuck what you do.

Those two acts have nothing to fucking do with the goddamn workplace and your introduction of them is typical of the fucking bullshit you post.

Engaging in sexual acts in the workplace, especially when one is in a clear position of power over the other, is a totalitarian act.

So Trump is a totalitarian, by your logic?

Yes, although I am not sure where you garner Trump has engaged in sexual acts while at the workplace.

The last one to hold office that was not was shot.

After he recouped, he ceased further attempts for fundamental change.

3

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: Today at 12:09:18 PM »

Claiming acts of driving and tax payments are somehow analogous to acts of banging an intern at the office

That's not what I said...

No, that is exactly what you said.

One can only take that you were placing yourself in Clinton's shoes by stating whether your driving habits or an honest or dishonest filing of taxes was a gauge of your political idealogy. First of all, you are nothing at all similar to Clinton in terms of position, power, or fame. B, nobody gives flying fuck what you do.

Those two acts have nothing to fucking do with the goddamn workplace and your introduction of them is typical of the fucking bullshit you post.

Engaging in sexual acts in the workplace, especially when one is in a clear position of power over the other, is a totalitarian act.

4

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: July 14, 2025, 12:21:48 PM »

Claiming acts of driving and tax payments are somehow analogous to acts of banging an intern at the office is exactly how fucked in the head many people are nowadays.

Astounding. Truly.

The Bushes and the Clintons are related and both happen to be totalitarians and criminals.

5

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: July 10, 2025, 04:33:57 PM »

Sadaam, you clearly stated Clinton was a centrist.

Laws governing sexual conduct in the workplace are set by PLOTICIANS (spelling error purposeful).

Therefore, the behavior has everything to do with political ideology.

It was the act of a domineering totalitarian, certainly not a centrist.

LD, we've pretty much exhausted the Stormy Daniels story. She is a lying cunt.

6

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: July 10, 2025, 12:45:11 PM »

^kramer thinks banging a pornstar is something evil.

LMMFAO!!!

7

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: July 10, 2025, 10:55:03 AM »

Plenty of steps taken that were certainly not centrist.

Well, maybe. So give examples of those then.
Banging an intern isn’t one of them.

BANGING INTERNS IS CENTRIST

8

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: July 09, 2025, 04:53:37 PM »

Clintons are "centrist."

What a fucking joke of a take.

Whether they are or not, the weird thing is you seem to be evidencing your position that they aren't by the fact Clinton had an affair with an intern.
"He cant be centrist! He got a blow job in the oval office!".

What the hell are you talking about? How are those two things linked?
Try "He can't be a centrist, he did <insert non-centrist policy he implemented here>"

Your lack of knowledge concerning the actions of the Clinton administration is not helping at all.

Plenty of steps taken that were certainly not centrist.

But then again, the so-called leftists here, like you, are actually totalitarians.

9

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: July 09, 2025, 10:27:31 AM »

The government is the sole reason why there are policies governing sexual activity within the workplace.

Of course Sadaam is being obstinate.

Clintons are "centrist."

What a fucking joke of a take.

10

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: July 09, 2025, 07:30:02 AM »

It's a matter of politics, certainly, but not of policy.

Yes, of course.

There are no government policies regarding sexual conduct in the workplace.

11

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: July 08, 2025, 05:59:54 PM »

When the affair is taking place with an intern in the workplace, that most certainly is a matter of politics.

Trump is having an affair with an intern in the Oval Office?

What the fuck are you smoking?

LMMFAO!!!

12

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: July 08, 2025, 10:27:29 AM »

Clinton a "centrist."

Explains the blow job (it is a perfectly acceptable policy to have sex relations with your intern) and Janet Reno (of Waco fame).

Again, what in the living fuck are you smoking?

13

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: July 07, 2025, 11:15:37 AM »

I also don't believe that Elon was ever especially liked or admired by the left.

That explains all the Democrats in Chicago parading around in Teslas with bumper stickers declaring, "I bought this before Elon went crazy."

WTF you smoking, anyway!?!?

LMMFAO!!!

14

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: July 07, 2025, 11:13:16 AM »

Sadaam - "Clinton-era centrism..."

Getting blown by an intern while seated behind the desk in the Oval Office is a very "centrist" thing to do.

LMMFAO!

15

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: June 26, 2025, 09:57:43 AM »

If someone else was asking the question, I would reply, " Ask harder."

But, I don't think you want a war.

of course i dont. what normal human would actually want a war (aside from people who get paid to talk about how there should be a war). maybe i need to switch to journalism, id love to make 20% 70%+ or less than i do now to yell at people why war is coming. also, trump bad, two more weeks, etc...

There are a lot of regular posters here clamoring for war, demanding the US continue to support Ukraine and Israel in their wars.

I am glad you don't view them as normal.

16

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: June 25, 2025, 10:18:23 AM »

The "no new wars" president has now begun a war with Iran.

i was promised a war by all the talking heads. where is the war?

If someone else was asking the question, I would reply, " Ask harder."

But, I don't think you want a war.

17

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Interviewing a Flat Earth supporter

« on: June 24, 2025, 04:59:23 AM »

Plenty of opportunity for the questions to be presented here and answered here, just as you did:

I do not view it as a "movement."

I looked out my window wherever I was at any given time.

Looking out my window.

Look out your window.

Nothing else to add.

You're welcome,

Andy

18

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: June 15, 2025, 09:29:00 AM »

A railroad across any ocean or to any ocean is not just unreasonable, it is simply stupid.

19

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: June 13, 2025, 03:12:21 PM »

^If anyone can find a more incoherent attempt to state anything resembling sense, please do.

Trump started the riots in LA.

Jesus, fucking christ...there are liars and shit bags and then there is LD.

20

Arts & Entertainment / Re: Superhero Movies & Comics General

« on: June 13, 2025, 12:47:04 PM »

With the exception of the first Batman with Michael Keaton and all three Christopher Nolan films, all of the DCU films are for shit.

Pity, really. Good material but poor execution.