Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Nah. He's just using a different definition of "blacked out" than most of the rest of the English speaking world.all of the news outlets are acknowledging that an impeachment inquiry has begun
What? You mean this guy on Twitter is lying? Surely not!
Would you please post the specifications of the antennas used? Line-of-sight does not necessarily mean highly directional.It sounds like they were lucky enough to catch an exceptionally long tropospheric duct.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.02802.pdfQuoteABSTRACT
With the growth of LoRa deployments there are plenty of anecdotal reports of very long wireless links, well beyond the line of sight. Most reports suggest that these links are related to anomalous tropospheric propagation. We developed a platform to study tropospheric links based on TheThingsNetwork, a popular LoRaWAN-based infrastructure.
Absolute nonsense.
Do you realize what line-of-sight at sea level means? It means it has nothing to do with the troposphere which is claimed to be at an average height of 8.1 MILES above sea level.
Not nonsense to you? Post the math that make it work in this case. But remember that nothing is pointing up to the troposphere, that only happens in your imagination.I have no involvement in the TROPPO LoRa project, so you would be better off asking the authors of the paper that I cited. I'm sure that they would be more than happy to answer any reasonable questions that you have about tropospheric LoRa propagation.
ABSTRACT
With the growth of LoRa deployments there are plenty of anecdotal reports of very long wireless links, well beyond the line of sight. Most reports suggest that these links are related to anomalous tropospheric propagation. We developed a platform to study tropospheric links based on TheThingsNetwork, a popular LoRaWAN-based infrastructure.
The Tweet is claiming that the big television networks are not covering it.That depends on what level of coverage you're looking for. If you want wall to wall coverage, then you're out of luck, but all of the news outlets are acknowledging that an impeachment inquiry has begun. But, then again, what do you expect when even a number of Republicans are saying that there doesn't appear to be much of any evidence of wrongdoing?
This joke of a partisan judgment claiming that there were inflated property values will be appealed and isn't going anywhere. For example, the judge in this case valued Mar-a-Lago at $18 Million.What a property is worth and what it would list for are not always the same. If someone wants to pay $300 million for a property that Trump paid $10 million for, then that that's up to them.
Please explain why projecting the image of a round earth onto a flat surface should invalidate any predictions that a round earth model would make.You do realize that this is essentially the same thing as saying that "GPS proves the curvature" like ichoosenonsense claimed, right? It's all done on paper from a mathematical model of the ball Earth. In reality no one has measured the curvature. Ever.Do you realize that a mathematical model of the ball earth can make predictions can can be verified in reality but won't work on a flat earth?
This is an unfortunate comment because it shows that you haven't looked at the material that your globe-defending friend provided.
It explains that you can project the imaginary ball's curvature onto a flat plane no problem by using the so-called "Snake Projection" method, and it is mathematically valid.
No, I meant what I said. Personal satisfaction has nothing to do with it.It may not be possible to measure the curvature to your satisfaction, but it is possible to verify the consequences of that curvature.
You mean that you are personally satisfied that it exists, which is different.
It looks bad but the box checked is "non-final disposition" so dunno what that means overall.
Mr. Kise also asked whether the ruling meant that Mr. Trump would have to sell assets including Trump Tower and 40 Wall Street, a downtown commercial property, or whether they could be managed by an independent receiver who the judge said would oversee the dissolution of the canceled companies.I think that it means that they're not quite sure what it means overall either, but they'll figure something out eventually.
Justice Engoron did not provide a clear response. After huddling with his law clerk, Allison Greenfield, he told Mr. Kise that he appreciated his concern and understood the question.
“I’m not prepared to issue a ruling right now, but we will take that up in various contexts I’m sure,” he said. He granted Mr. Kise’s request for 30 days to devise a plan for implementing the order.
You do realize that this is essentially the same thing as saying that "GPS proves the curvature" like ichoosenonsense claimed, right? It's all done on paper from a mathematical model of the ball Earth. In reality no one has measured the curvature. Ever.Do you realize that a mathematical model of the ball earth can make predictions can can be verified in reality but won't work on a flat earth? It may not be possible to measure the curvature to your satisfaction, but it is possible to verify the consequences of that curvature.
Imagine calling coordinated mass murder "bad logistics".Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. -- Hanlon's razor
I couldn't find the rules with a quick google but I think he needs a certain percentage in the polls to be on the primary ballot.The rules vary by state, but usually involve filing petitions with a number of signatures with the state election board.
So if he isn't a household name, few who votes in the primary is gonna vote for him.
I'm not sure where you got that from, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't say resembling that.By the way, the horizon really isn't a physical thing.Damn, RE light now exists outside of the realm of physics.
And you say we're the ones with strange ideas about light.Do you have anything to add to the discussion or should I report you for low content posting?
Apparently none of the modern methods for measuring curvature are acceptable to you, so we seem to be at an impasse.How would you suggest that the curvature along several miles of the earth be physically measured?
Well, I would say it's up to you (the globe cult) to figure out the details since you're the ones claiming that the curvature exists and the ones who have pretty much all the resources & money.
Or alternatively - oh well, you can keep not producing proof of curvature for all eternity for all I care.If objects moving past and sinking below the horizon, satellite imagery or any of the other evidence posted isn't enough proof of curvature for you, then I don't know what is.
How would you suggest that the curvature along several miles of the earth be physically measured?A physical measurement of the ball would be swell. No need to measure the whole ball, a few miles would be enough.Then I suggest you talk with a surveyor because they measure bits and pieces of the earth all the time and a few miles is far enough for them to need to account for the earth's curvature.
Do you not understand that a physical (tangible) measurement is not the same thing as an optical measurement?
A physical measurement of the ball would be swell. No need to measure the whole ball, a few miles would be enough.Then I suggest you talk with a surveyor because they measure bits and pieces of the earth all the time and a few miles is far enough for them to need to account for the earth's curvature.
Okay then, what proof would you accept?That's easy. It's because, as so many FE'ers have shown time and time again, there is no evidence of curvature that you will accept.
I'm not asking for evidence, I'm asking for proof. Not the same thing.
No.By the way, the horizon really isn't a physical thing.
Ok? I know that, but if the Earth is a ball then it must be physical, no?
What do you think the horizon is, then?I already told you. The horizon is where the sky and earth appear to meet. What do you think the horizon is?
The salient question is why have the globe cult not provided proof of a physical horizon/curvature yet if it is physically there.That's easy. It's because, as so many FE'ers have shown time and time again, there is no evidence of curvature that you will accept.
I know you asked for a reference level, but you're not gonna get one.Then those pictures don't prove anything.
Observations from a plane + IR already soundly debunk the globe, because they don't match globe model predictions at all like I said. So far all the globe zealots have ignored that information, including you. Why?Do tell. What does the globe model predict that the pictures from a plane + IR predict that the horizon should look like?
Thanks for confirming that the horizon is a result of perspective and not "curvature of Earth".The horizon is a result of earth and sky appearing to meet in the distance and will exist regardless of the shape of the earth. The salient question is whether or not a object can move past and dip below the horizon. On a flat earth, the answer is no. On a round earth, the answer is yes.
