[Blanko]

I have nothing against discretion, I just want it to be fair and to allow users to know what to expect.

As for the thing about personal value judgments, I wasn't talking about them in that strict of a sense. I warned fe43 because people were reporting that his posts containing massive images were crashing their browsers, not because I personally found those posts annoying. In fact, my browser wouldn't even load the images so for my personal enjoyment I wouldn't have even cared.

[lolwut?]

So to be clear, can I continue to post 20,000 HR tags?

[juner]

I have nothing against discretion, I just want it to be fair and to allow users to know what to expect.

As for the thing about personal value judgments, I wasn't talking about them in that strict of a sense. I warned fe43 because people were reporting that his posts containing massive images were crashing their browsers, not because I personally found those posts annoying. In fact, my browser wouldn't even load the images so for my personal enjoyment I wouldn't have even cared.

I agree with everything you said in this post that could be agreed upon by me.

It seems we are on the same page. I am still not sure where we go from here. Something still needs to be decided. A technical restriction is fine by me, but that is a solution for this case and maybe similar cases. I am sure there are a lot of other things that we potentially have not thought of. So, we can react to those as we come across them. Or, have a general rule or policy on how to handle things that fall outside of what is explicitly stated in the rules. I still feel the latter would be better long term.

[Particle Person]

So to be clear, can I continue to post 20,000 HR tags?

Yes.

[Pete Svarrior]

So to be clear, can I continue to post 20,000 HR tags?

Yes.

I'm using Edge and this policy sounds good to me.