*

Online Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7654
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3720 on: March 07, 2019, 01:50:35 PM »
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.

*

Offline Roundy

  • Abdicator of the Zetetic Council
  • *
  • Posts: 4183
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3721 on: March 07, 2019, 09:22:39 PM »
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-administration-weighs-publicizing-hospital-rates-negotiated-with-insurers-11551990505

This is interesting.  I'm actually rooting for Trump to succeed in something he's trying to do.  If we can't have universal healthcare something like this that would put more power in the hands of consumers and potentially lower the ridiculous deductibles insurance companies have implemented in the wake of the dismal failure that is Obamacare might be the next best thing.

Go Donald.
« Last Edit: March 07, 2019, 09:38:23 PM by Roundy »
Dr. Frank is a physicist. He says it's impossible. So it's impossible.
My friends, please remember Tom said this the next time you fall into the trap of engaging him, and thank you. :)

*

Online Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7654
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3722 on: March 08, 2019, 03:19:49 AM »
Would be nice.
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.

*

Online Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7654
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3723 on: March 08, 2019, 03:54:00 AM »
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.

*

Online Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7654
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3724 on: March 08, 2019, 08:28:08 AM »
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.

totallackey


totallackey

Re: Trump
« Reply #3726 on: March 08, 2019, 11:28:13 AM »

totallackey

Re: Trump
« Reply #3727 on: March 08, 2019, 11:29:54 AM »
And also not a shocker.
https://www.npr.org/2019/03/07/701134722/u-s-reportedly-compiled-database-of-journalists-working-along-southwest-border

$10 says no fox news journalist is on that list.
What's the problem?

Do you envision a Fox News journalist actively attempting to aid any illegals trying to sneak into the country?

Rama Set

Re: Trump
« Reply #3728 on: March 08, 2019, 11:59:26 AM »

totallackey

Re: Trump
« Reply #3729 on: March 08, 2019, 12:15:09 PM »
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/05/politics/ivanka-trump-security-clearance-pressure/index.html


What's the problem???

Nepotism.
Is there a law against nepotism in this case?

Ivanka Trump occupies an, "...official, unpaid position..."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivanka_Trump

Imagine unironically wanting to drain the swamp but approve of nepotism at the same time.
Imagine the irony in claiming nepotism when Ivanka occupies an UNPAID POSITION!

I checked your profile.

You may want to update it to read:

Occupation: professional grabber of straws.

*

Offline honk

  • *
  • Posts: 3347
  • resident goose
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3730 on: March 08, 2019, 02:26:52 PM »
Who cares if she's not being paid? This story just talks about how Trump demanded a security clearance for her regardless of whether she truly merited one, and is further confirmation that neither she nor Kushner (nor Trump himself, for that matter) have any business being in the White House and running the country. In other news:

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/433007-trump-i-did-not-break-campaign-finance-laws

I love how Trump's lies have continued to change on this subject. First he denied the affair, then he denied knowing about the payments, much less reimbursing Cohen for them, and now he's claiming that it was all done legally. There's no reason to believe he's telling the truth this time.
ur retartet but u donut even no it and i walnut tell u y

*

Offline Cain

  • *
  • Posts: 1086
  • This is the line of division.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3731 on: March 08, 2019, 02:33:14 PM »
Can we please divert the Mueller investigation to find the tape of Trump getting peed on by Russian hookers?
I don't give a damn if that'll ruin the investigation, I need that tape.
You just made my list, buddy.  >:(
this world does not have room for another mind as intelligent as yours.

*

Online Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7654
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3732 on: March 08, 2019, 02:54:01 PM »
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/05/politics/ivanka-trump-security-clearance-pressure/index.html


What's the problem???

Nepotism.
Is there a law against nepotism in this case?

Ivanka Trump occupies an, "...official, unpaid position..."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivanka_Trump

Imagine unironically wanting to drain the swamp but approve of nepotism at the same time.
Imagine the irony in claiming nepotism when Ivanka occupies an UNPAID POSITION!

I checked your profile.

You may want to update it to read:

Occupation: professional grabber of straws.
Why would a paycheck matter?
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.

*

Online Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7654
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3733 on: March 08, 2019, 02:55:54 PM »
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/05/politics/ivanka-trump-security-clearance-pressure/index.html


What's the problem???

Nepotism.
Is there a law against nepotism in this case?

Ivanka Trump occupies an, "...official, unpaid position..."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivanka_Trump
Imagine if Hillary let Chelse work at the WH state department as a senior advisor, knowing all the secrets of America.
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.

*

Online Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7654
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3734 on: March 08, 2019, 02:56:38 PM »
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.

*

Online Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7654
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #3735 on: March 08, 2019, 02:59:55 PM »
And also not a shocker.
https://www.npr.org/2019/03/07/701134722/u-s-reportedly-compiled-database-of-journalists-working-along-southwest-border

$10 says no fox news journalist is on that list.
What's the problem?

Do you envision a Fox News journalist actively attempting to aid any illegals trying to sneak into the country?

Oh, so its all it is?
Well, I guess all those cameras would hide illegals, wouldn't they?
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.

totallackey

Re: Trump
« Reply #3736 on: March 08, 2019, 05:03:12 PM »
On the notion of things we already knewbelieve:
https://www.npr.org/2019/03/07/701052337/the-white-house-and-its-shadow-cabinet-of-fox-news-tv-hosts
FTFY...

No need to thank me.

Wait, so you don't think Fox News and Trump are BFFs?
Hell no.

More likely Trump is best friends with CNN and MSNBC since they make his case so well with most sane people.

totallackey

Re: Trump
« Reply #3737 on: March 08, 2019, 05:04:25 PM »
And also not a shocker.
https://www.npr.org/2019/03/07/701134722/u-s-reportedly-compiled-database-of-journalists-working-along-southwest-border

$10 says no fox news journalist is on that list.
What's the problem?

Do you envision a Fox News journalist actively attempting to aid any illegals trying to sneak into the country?

Oh, so its all it is?
Well, I guess all those cameras would hide illegals, wouldn't they?
LOL!

Plenty of video of the illegals doing exactly the right thing at the border!

totallackey

Re: Trump
« Reply #3738 on: March 08, 2019, 05:21:57 PM »
Who cares if she's not being paid? This story just talks about how Trump demanded a security clearance for her regardless of whether she truly merited one, and is further confirmation that neither she nor Kushner (nor Trump himself, for that matter) have any business being in the White House and running the country. In other news:

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/433007-trump-i-did-not-break-campaign-finance-laws

I love how Trump's lies have continued to change on this subject. First he denied the affair, then he denied knowing about the payments, much less reimbursing Cohen for them, and now he's claiming that it was all done legally. There's no reason to believe he's telling the truth this time.
Plenty of reason to believe him.

The checks Cohen showed?

Payments for legal services rendered, because if they were not, shitbag Cohen would have sued Trump PRIOR to claiming they were reimbursements for Stormy in the hearing last Wednesday...but no...he filed suit for lack of payment AFTER the hearing to cover his tracks...

Now, it looks like Stormy will have to pay back the money to Cohen...so, let's see what shitbag Cohen does with that money...dollar to a donut it is his...

totallackey

Re: Trump
« Reply #3739 on: March 08, 2019, 05:22:46 PM »
Can we please divert the Mueller investigation to find the tape of Trump getting peed on by Russian hookers?
I don't give a damn if that'll ruin the investigation, I need that tape.
I agree!