Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
how i spent literally 20 years =/= stick to it for more than a day.One could state for certain you have massive problems finding your way across the street based on your demonstrable issues with time keeping.
Evidence required, because none of what you type here is an indication that you were born prior to 1970, and if that is indeed the case, then you are younger than me by a far sight.I am anti-narcotics of all sorts and believe that if anyone does use narcotics, minimally they are running the risk of typing stupid shit on the internet, just like you are doing here. Eventually, they will hasten their death.Dude, I was doing drugs and alcohol decades before you were born.
I have typed literally millions of words, in the form of novels, articles and postings. Nothing I've never written compares with the anger, nastiness and idiocy in your posts.Yes, comparing my posts to the idiocy contained in just this sentence above would serve well in identifying the type of idiocy in the sentence. If you sat down and started typing numbers right now, it would take you three and one-half years just to reach one million words, so forgive me if I do not go for your "millions," claim.
Maybe you need to try some drugs.After having you so brilliantly display the validity of my position, no thanks.
Pro - choice.The group established and funded by the CIA, formerly known as the Mujahudeen, now labeled as the Taliban by the CIA, had enough of the destructive policies implemented b the CIA, under Czar Bushy the I, and will resist the attempts to seize total control of the opium and heroin trade occurring in their country.
GO TALIBAN!!!
So you are...
Pro-narcotics.
Pro-Shaier law.Evidently, you are anti-spelling.
And technically a terrorist sympathizer.I am consistently on the side of anti-terrorists.
You know... Not shocked.When you cannot spell simple words, you probably have no clue what you are feeling at any given moment.
Don't you think that if the Taliban are what we they are portrayed as, women won't be allowed to leave the country?Can you please write down something that could serve as an intelligible interpretation of what is considered a coherent thought regarding what you mean to communicate?
We have confidence you can go over there and reason with them.Except women. Women will be worse off. So half the population will be worse off. Oh, and all the men who think women shouldn’t be treated like slaves. They also will be worse off.But that's just it. I don't think women will be persecuted in the way our media are saying. Can the Taliban AFFORD to educate girls? Mmmmm. Maybe not. Are they going to actively go out to attack women ... I'm not so sure they will. They all have mothers, sisters, daughters and wives. We should put a pin in that one and revisit when the dust settles. Being told a terrible outcome will occur by the media and that imagined doom actually coming to fruition are usually two very different things.
Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think America should have been there for 20 years and I don’t doubt on the ground level, many people won’t have their lives substantially disrupted. Except women, of course.
Why do you imagine the Taliban will have changed their treatment of women?
I have no idea why you suddenly want to pretend to care about Afghan women, let alone women in general.Although I understand wanting the US gone and having their imperialism stifled, I am not sure how one could be happy the Taliban are in power.Could be that lack of understanding you have with the Afghans having a big problem with outsiders coming to their country and trying to spread their woke bullshit getting in the way.
Yes, not wanting women treated like slaves is just far-left woke politics.
Although I understand wanting the US gone and having their imperialism stifled, I am not sure how one could be happy the Taliban are in power.Could be that lack of understanding you have with the Afghans having a big problem with outsiders coming to their country and trying to spread their woke bullshit getting in the way.
How long did it take to formulate the question?Two doctors wrote the paper.
If you get sick with a respiratory illness that prevents you from breathing and also affects your cognitive abilities, taking away your taste and smell, will you email those two doctors or will you go to an ER?
I didn't decry the link to the paper.Please post the link to the journals it appears it as well as the peer reviews.I posted a peer reviewed paper, written by two doctors.So much for the extensive clinical trials you were trying to praise, Rama.
Pure, disgusting crap posted by you once again.
"Even though far from being comprehensive or even adequate, this document has rather far-reaching implications: it shows that Pfizer— as well as the authorities that were apprised of these data— must have recognized the grave risks of adverse events after vaccination even before the onset of clinical trials. Nevertheless, Pfizer’s own clinical trials failed to monitor any of the clinical risks that were clearly evident from these data and the regulatory authorities failed to enforce proper standards of oversight. This dual failure has caused the most grievous harm to the public.
1The same data may also have been filed in the U.S. and other wester countries, but the FDA and the corresponding health regulators did not release them to the public. "
https://drive.google.com/viewerng/viewer?url=http://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/randyhillier/pages/958/attachments/original/1628198186/Pfizer-pharmacokinetics-and-toxicity.pdf?1628198186
And you called us out for posting documentation on "unofficial sites". Can't get anymore unofficial than your own google drive. XD
Also: an Ortheopedist and a retired microbiologist probably aren't the best group to be reliable in vaccine results.
Also, as you'll not note, I didn't attack the validity of their data, just your hypocracy of decrying the link used while using an even less credible link.
Nothing alleged about it, it describes the processes in full.QuoteThe paper reports on the processes utilized in mRNA vaccines and the results of the Pfizer protocols used in the development of the vaccine.Allegedly. Gonna wait for those peer review links there buddy.
Nothing important obviously.QuoteGo lie down in the corner somewhere.Nah, I have things to do.
Your writings and musings are useless here.
I posted a peer reviewed paper, written by two doctors.So much for the extensive clinical trials you were trying to praise, Rama.
Pure, disgusting crap posted by you once again.
"Even though far from being comprehensive or even adequate, this document has rather far-reaching implications: it shows that Pfizer— as well as the authorities that were apprised of these data— must have recognized the grave risks of adverse events after vaccination even before the onset of clinical trials. Nevertheless, Pfizer’s own clinical trials failed to monitor any of the clinical risks that were clearly evident from these data and the regulatory authorities failed to enforce proper standards of oversight. This dual failure has caused the most grievous harm to the public.
1The same data may also have been filed in the U.S. and other wester countries, but the FDA and the corresponding health regulators did not release them to the public. "
https://drive.google.com/viewerng/viewer?url=http://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/randyhillier/pages/958/attachments/original/1628198186/Pfizer-pharmacokinetics-and-toxicity.pdf?1628198186
And you called us out for posting documentation on "unofficial sites". Can't get anymore unofficial than your own google drive. XD
Also: an Ortheopedist and a retired microbiologist probably aren't the best group to be reliable in vaccine results.
Firstly, learn to be bbcode. If you are so mad you can’t post coherently, take a break. Second, drawing broad inferences from a sample size of five is just horrendously off the mark.Stop trolling.
Hey, a vaccinated person got hit by a car. Using Logic, vaccination makes it inevitable that a car will hit you.Using the paper cited logical thing to do. The paper draws no statistical references to cars.
73 percent of the ICU patients being double vaccinated and being treated for covid is very super significant.We don't know that yet. 70 percent of hospitalizations are vaccinated people.Don’t you think it’s not dangerous at all?There are a significant amount of other things more dangerous than something that kills at a 1 percent rate.
Like the vaccin… oh no wait. That’s not even close to as dangerous as COVID.
@Dr. Eugene Sloan 73% in Massachusetts ICU are double vaccinated so please do not mislead others.
The recent mortality and morbidity report from the CDC showed that 74% of new COVID in Barnstable, Massachusetts were vaccinated but only 4 of them were hospitalized. So actually 80% were hospitalized in a statistically insignificant anecdote. (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7031e2.htm?s_cid=mm7031e2_w)
I look forward to you saying how super significant this small sample size is.
Terrific! Probably the first time you've posted a fact on this forum!QuoteI obviously feel great, better than you even, I'm sure.QuoteNice double negative.
How does it feel to have to stoop so low?
I’m glad you are so sure.