Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Not an easy one. Images in posts are typically just links to external hosting - they're as good as the place the poster chose to upload the image to (or as good as the site they "borrowed" the image from).Wasn't there some discussion concerning the hosting of images here on your server?
Spikes in deaths are not uncommon at all, especially in an aging population.This was addressed in many of the cofeve threads.Oh right, so over 16 years there was a rise in births and that led to a one off spike in 2020 did it?
The supposed "excess deaths," were coming anyway. During the years 1945 - 1962, more people were born than at any prior time in recorded history.
There's a clear rising trend of deaths - as you'd expect in an ageing population. But a clear spike in 2020 when Covid hit.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/195920/number-of-deaths-in-the-united-states-since-1990/
But if you think your "brilliant" hypothesis has any merit then feel free to point me at some actual experts who agree with you.
Tumbleweeds.
You're the one who brought up cofeve.QuoteNot once during the entirety of the plandemic were you ever offering any sort of alternative, rational approach instead of what was done.They should have locked down earlier and harder. By the time they did lock down it was too late - because of Trump repeatedly insisting it was under control and would all go away. And they should have done more to protect the vulnerable while giving more freedom to people who were at less risk. There.
Now, stop derailing the thread. The point is Trump was a bloody awful president.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/feb/20/presidents-ranking-trump-biden-listNobody gives a fuck about what the goddamn shitrag has printed on it in terms of denialism.
But gas and groceries were cheaper under him so you voted him back in. Silly you!
To be honest I am getting pretty bored of this place.The exit door is right over there, clearly marked.
I know...I know...Without the lockdown so many more people would have died, and will die if we ease up before we are ready.The last sentence - probably right.
"...something was causing a lot of extra deaths - and we saw that in the UK too."This was addressed in many of the cofeve threads.
The issue is in the West we have a lot of old and/or unhealthy people.Not once during the entirety of the plandemic were you ever offering any sort of alternative, rational approach instead of what was done. Granted, you were found stating things such as, "it isn't a holy shit thing, we are all going to die," but mostly you were just here spreading more fucking bullshit, such as:
It’s genuinely baffling the man doesn’t have a Nobel prize in science for his proof of a flat earth and one in science for his pioneering work curing cancer and the Covid-19 pandemic.This was in response to Tom pointing out that hydroxychloriquine was approved to treat coronaviruses by Fauci 15 years prior to the plandemic.
Forgive everyone who reads this for not taking your lack of comprehension seriously.Okay.And when was it over last time?Do you even understand what I wrote?
You said from precedent, which implies that this has happened before and the country came to end or very nearly did.
You clearly do not understand.
Past precedent refers to prior events, setting the stage for future situations.
So, instead of you writing, "...from precedent, which implies that this has happened before..."
You would write, '...from precedent, which implies that things have happened before..."
Precedent typically involves the thing you're talking about. Saying "from past precedent of how you walk your dog, I conclude that the country is going to crash" isn't precedent.
Okay.And when was it over last time?Do you even understand what I wrote?
You said from precedent, which implies that this has happened before and the country came to end or very nearly did.
And when was it over last time?Do you even understand what I wrote?
Well, since Biden decided to keep the tariffs in place on China, I believe you can go ahead and openly bitch about that now too...^ITT LD fails to understand tariffs on imported goods lead to increased production of the same goods within the country, along with livable wages for those new hires that will be producing those goods. LD advocates continued sweatshop wages in China and status-quo.*Sigh* yes, eventually. If the tariffs are maintained in 5-10 years domestic production will be up. BUT costs will stay up as the cost of making it domestically will be the same or about the same as importing it. So more expensive than now, regardless.
I'm all for pain now, but since Trump won on "shit is too expensive!" I'm not sure making it MORE expensive is gonna help.
...while the Democrats seemingly haven't changed at all over the last thirty or so.It is patently obvious Democrats have changed for the worse.
The issue is none of the current process is in step with the founding principles of the nation.
What's your actual issue here? You weren't going to vote for Biden, you didn't vote for Harris.
See above and the rest of your commentary throughout these threads.QuotePS: In the future, I believe it would be best for you and the rest to stop pretending. You are getting exactly what you want in terms of destabilization of the US constitutional republic.I don't even know what any of that is supposed to mean.
How so?Please provide the number of primary votes received by the Democratic nominee for US President in 2024.
^LD doesn't understand tariffs are levied in terms of competitive restrictions, relating directly to where things are manufactured, not produced.^LD doesn't understand tariffs.
Adding a "tax" to goods and services in order to have them imported with the goal of making prices for domestic products and services more competitive.
So a 20% tarrif for rice from China means any cost of the item will increase by about 20% for the end consumer.
You do understand that, yes?
I would think you already have some interview questions in place, correct?I wonder why people don't simply opt for the simpler choice of doing the interview or asking the questions here in the open?I am not doing this for my reasons but for the assessment I am working on and unfortunately, I don't have any other simpler choice of doing interviews for subject. If you have any suggestions, I would love to take on board
Looks like a doxxing expedition to me.