4221

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Night Skies.

« on: December 30, 2017, 01:50:31 PM »

I am really struggling to understand why the night sky is different in the Northern Hemisphere vs the Southern Hemisphere.  Since the Earth is flat, the sky should be (for the most part) the same in both hemispheres with small variations based on a person’s exact location on the Flat Earth.

It's interesting that your first sentence is something which can be easily explained by a rotating globe and your second sentence concludes that the earth is flat.

But I know this can’t be true unless the earth is round, which is obviously impossible.

Why is it obviously impossible?

4222

Flat Earth Community / Re: Doesn't the bible say the sun and moon are IN the firmament?

« on: December 30, 2017, 08:58:52 AM »

Yes, Galileo was condemned by the Catholic church...who have since apologised and admitted he was right

https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg13618460.600-vatican-admits-galileo-was-right-/

4223

Flat Earth Community / Re: Doesn't the bible say the sun and moon are IN the firmament?

« on: December 29, 2017, 10:47:42 PM »

"The Bible shows the way to go to heaven, not the way the heavens go." - Galileo Galilei

I don't believe that the Bible should be read scientifically. My understanding of the Bible is informed by science, just as my understanding of the word "sunrise" is. I've not been to a church which teaches flat earth theory, much less it been the "first thing they told me".

4224

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Free Will disproved

« on: December 29, 2017, 11:54:16 AM »

If we really have no free will then why should anyone be accountable for their actions?
This whole premise is based on the idea that your thoughts are not controlled by you.
What is the basis for that?
Who else would they be controlled by? God? Christianity certainly doesn't teach that God controls our every thought, I'm less sure about other religions.

4225

Flat Earth Community / Re: Anyone for a public discussion?

« on: December 29, 2017, 10:18:20 AM »

If you were challenged to show proof of the rules of the same model that two horizontal parallel perspective lines will approach each other for infinity but never touch, or that a body thousands of miles away will appear a certain number of degrees above the horizon, or that perspective behaves the same at all scales, you will be embarrassingly unable to do so.

Aren't you 'embarrassingly unable' to produce a map of a flat earth?

4226

Flat Earth Investigations / Re: Is the dome around earth even real?

« on: December 29, 2017, 10:15:32 AM »

Some flat earth theorists believe in a physical dome, some in a type of forcefield, and some in no dome. I personally believe there is no physical dome, but there is a forcefield-type dome (possibly electromagnetic).

Can I ask what mechanism you think powers that forcefield and what evidence you have for it existing?

4227

Flat Earth Investigations / Re: Flat or Round?

« on: December 23, 2017, 03:38:21 PM »

Flat Earth research requires you to think for yourself, and search for yourself. There is a lot to it and no one is going to personally spoon feed everything Flat Earthers have ever debated and discussed to you.

Honestly, that is a cop out.
I have seen you request other people to provide proof for their assertions (which you always ignore when provide or claim is faked).
What Flat Earth requires is a large slice of confirmation bias and a fair bit of cognitive dissonance.

4228

Flat Earth Community / Re: Trump signs NASA bill today..

« on: December 23, 2017, 03:35:33 PM »

LMAO - I think you've forgotten the original point. It wasn't worth the cost to keep going to the moon. History and science is on my side. If you think winning an debate is running your mouth, not providing any evidence, and forgetting the point, you win. Congrats.

The answer to "why have we not been back to the moon" is informed by the answer to the question "why did we go to the moon in the first place"?
And that wasn't just in the spirit of discovery, it was largely motivated by the cold war. Basically it came down to beating the Russians.
I'll be honest, I'm disappointed we haven't been back in my lifetime, I'm disappointed we don't have a lunar base. But the fact is those things would be crazy expensive and exploration of space has moved on - the ISS, putting Curiosity on Mars. But NASA's budget isn't what it was in the 60s when the space race was in full swing.

http://www.spaceflightinsider.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/NASA-Budget-Federal.svg_.png

Technology does always move on but as you say that doesn't mean everything gets faster. Concorde was developed in the late 60s and we still don't have any other commercial airliners going at over Mach 1. Going faster is expensive. Basically, F=ma. And you have something to provide that F. So airline technology has moved on in different ways, more comfort, better entertainment systems and so on.

It's unclear why us having not returned to the moon is in some way a smoking gun for flat earth theory. If the claim is that all the missions were faked then they could have just faked more. Actually would be much easier these days with the CGI available. Is the theory that NASA are instead pumping money into faking the ISS instead? Ludicrous really.

4229

Flat Earth Community / Re: Things I owe Tom Bishop

« on: December 21, 2017, 04:07:07 PM »

I recall that Tom wants proof that parallel lines will continue for infinity without ever meeting.

Parallel:
adjective
1.
extending in the same direction, equidistant at all points, and never converging or diverging:
Geometry.
2. (of straight lines) lying in the same plane but never meeting no matter how far extended

Absolutely, but like I said Tom actually wants proof that it's true. A large part of his belief in flat earth depends on there being some ambiguity with perspective.

Probably stating the obvious here but that's like asking for proof that a square has 4 equal sides.
That is the definition of what a square is. The definition of parallel lines is ones which don't meet (well, "meet at infinity" is the textbook definition, I believe).
If he thinks he can prove they do meet then I'd like to see his explanation.

4230

Flat Earth Investigations / Re: What happened with the Space Shuttle Columbia.

« on: December 21, 2017, 02:30:48 PM »

It’s yet another example of Tom’s double standard of evidence. He accepts something that agrees with his worldview readily, like this, Miles Mathis or Rowbotham; but scrutinizes well established sources as if they are homeless people shouting on the corner (e.g. his treatment of Euclidean geometry, NASA and the Cavendish experiment). Par for the course really.

Well, quite.
All the pictures of earth showing it to be round are declared to be "fake" with no backup to that assertion at all.
But these pictures which fit the agenda are clearly real and these are definitely the same people as "died" in the Challenger disaster.

The confirmation bias and cognitive dissonance are strong with this one.

4231

Flat Earth Community / Re: Help this student understand the society!

« on: December 21, 2017, 01:59:06 PM »

If you don't want to fill in the questionnaire then don't, but a question about education level is a reasonable one in assessing the demographics of the members.
I'd say gender, age, country of original are all reasonable questions in assessing that.

4232

Flat Earth Community / Re: Trump signs NASA bill today..

« on: December 21, 2017, 01:50:51 PM »

Did anyone else see in the news today that Trump has signed a bill for NASA so  they can supposedly send humans to the moon for long term exploration and begin human exploration to mars! First of all, that’s major tax money for nothing, and secondly that tells me the government is worried that people are catching on. Why has it been so long since the United States has been to the moon? Since then, for years there have only been low earth orbit missions. Interesting..

The reason we haven't gone to the moon again is that there is nothing else to be learned there. Why spend billions of $$ for no reason?

More to do with the funding dryiing up. The space race in the 60s was politically motivated. Russia had some initial successes, first satellite, first man in space. The US were desperate to catch up and overtake them, which they did. But it wasn't cheap. After they'd done it a few times the public appetite for it was on the wane hence the later missions being scrapped.

4233

Flat Earth Community / Re: Trump signs NASA bill today..

« on: December 21, 2017, 01:48:58 PM »

I don't think we have ever been to the moon. It's probably impossible.

I have no doubt in my mind that we went to the moon. Why would they fake it?? It would be harder to fake the moon landing in the 1960s then actually go there.

More to the point, I haven't heard Russia (who were in the space race in the 60s) calling America out for faking it. Or Australia, who relayed the signals.
Not to mention the literally thousands of people who would have to have been "in on it", many of whom are still alive.

4234

Flat Earth Community / Re: Help this student understand the society!

« on: December 21, 2017, 01:42:02 PM »

Why would you set out to try and pigeon hole flat earther's as stupid and ill-educated and then expect co-operation in your survey? The survey is already loaded, from the off. That isn't going to tell you anything about the society.

That's not very fair. If this person is looking for demographic data about the people who make up the society then it's a perfectly reasonable question.
Kinda agree that the questionnaire is not particularly well designed, but accusations of pigeon holing seem a little harsh.