Thanks, Stack.
I was just gonna ignore him because I have better shit to do than feed a troll whose not gonna accept anything I throw out anyway.
Stack didn't help you at all.
I am sure Pfizer is acting according to capitalism as you understand it, which actually speaks volumes about your understanding rather than capitalism.
You asked for a non-Pfizer independent source. You got one. Why not address what you asked for rather than deflecting toward whatever your notion of "capitalism" is?
Is it that you simply have an issue with Pfizer alone and not the other vaccines India has been using to dole out 1.8 billion doses?
Where does your non-independent source help re: 0.06? Let alone, methodology.
Under the heading called "Methods".
Before I waste more time, what stats are you actually looking for? Stats for any After Effects (AE), Severe After Effects (SAE - Usually defined as would you have to miss a day of work after a jab) and/or Life-Threatening After Effects (Like going into anaphylactic shock and can't breathe or some heart inflammation issue, etc.
From your source: "there is little real-world, patient-reported data on adverse effects after receiving COVID-19 vaccination and in whom adverse effects may be more common."
Yep. And that's what the study set out to tackle.
Do you have an issue with Pfizer alone and not the other vaccines India has been using to dole out 1.8 billion doses? Would you prefer Russia's Sputnik vax?