1
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: April 07, 2023, 10:04:56 PM »Just because Trump doesn't run the store doesn't mean that he isn't profiting off of the storeIrrelevant to the subject at hand.I look forward to a confusingly blistering attack from Pete Svarrior.Happy to oblige.But Trump's web page is linking to them so they are endorsed by Trump just not officially.Look, I get it, Orange Man Bad. I agree. However, you couldn't have possibly done all this work without realising that "Trump's web page" is also a WinRed fundraiser. You're looking at WinRed calling WinRed official. I also understand the innate need to frame the existence of these separate entities as "circumvention of the rules", and all that jazz, but you're gonna have to present some evidence that WinRed are lying about Trump's not involvement - just saying "yeah, so uhhh they say they're not involved, but that's just a scam" is the intellectual equivalent of a wet fart.
The Orange man is indeed bad but that's not really relevant here. Super PACs are hardly unique to Trump. I think if you drill down on any other politician's similar fundraising efforts then you'd see a similar arrangement.
Am I correct in assuming that you live in the UK? If so then you're probably not aware of the whole idea of Super PACs. I'll leave it to you to research that one. There's quite a bit to go over. Long story short though, it leads to some campaign finance laws that can be utterly farcical at times, like WinRed plastering Trump's name everywhere to fundraiser, shoving all that money into Trump's campaign coffers but then adding a standard boilerplate "not affiliated yada yada".