Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Rushy

Pages: < Back  1 ... 222 223 [224] 225 226 ... 240  Next >
4461
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Russia Invades Ukraine
« on: March 09, 2014, 03:19:39 PM »
No, the US and UK will make a lot of noise, be ignored and then skulk off with their tails between their legs. This one is over. Putin 1 - 0 Western Drama Queens.

You just agreed with me, so why'd you start your post off with "no"? Ah, I already know, it's because your obligated to disagree with the nearest post. Sometimes without even reading it!

4462
Technology & Information / Re: New home network hardware
« on: March 09, 2014, 03:18:15 PM »
God dammit, Parsifal. Finally a site with graphics cards in stock and reasonable prices and it is "Australia's Premier PC Store."

4463
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Russia Invades Ukraine
« on: March 09, 2014, 03:14:56 PM »
Well, back on topic. Unfortunately at this point Ukraine is pretty much toast. NATO isn't going to help them because no one wants to see WWIII. This is going to turn into Grade A cold war.

4464
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Russia Invades Ukraine
« on: March 09, 2014, 03:00:57 AM »
Its not the organisation to deal with this though. Its too biased. That was the point I was making. A point which you have done your damnedest to ignore.

Oh, I should probably make some sort of argument to show that the UN can't be biased.

So how would the UN overseeing work if Russia would veto anything they didn't like?

Also resolutions don't have to be unanimous. You need 9 out of 15 votes for a resolution to pass with only 5 nations (US, Russia, UK, France and China) holding the power of veto.

But this wouldn't be a resolution. In fact I have no fucking idea what you are talking about as usual.

The UN has 6 main parts. Only the Security council works with 15 votes and power of veto. The General assembly has one vote each. The Court of Justice elects 15 judges. The secretariat has an elected UN Secretary General, the economic and social council elects 54 members and there is a trustee council which I think is asleep or mothballed or defunct or something. I'm probably wasting my time. You are as dumb as a bag of hammers.

Wow, you sure make this easy.

4465
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Russia Invades Ukraine
« on: March 08, 2014, 10:44:01 PM »
I'm glad you could realize your error. You seem to have forgotten what your own argument was... not surprising. As I said before, you seem to argue with the closest post. Here, let me remind you...

The UN pick sides and is overwhelmingly run by the West.

And let me introduce you to why your argument is wrong...

So how would the UN overseeing work if Russia would veto anything they didn't like?

Also resolutions don't have to be unanimous. You need 9 out of 15 votes for a resolution to pass with only 5 nations (US, Russia, UK, France and China) holding the power of veto.

But this wouldn't be a resolution. In fact I have no fucking idea what you are talking about as usual.

The UN has 6 main parts. Only the Security council works with 15 votes and power of veto. The General assembly has one vote each. The Court of Justice elects 15 judges. The secretariat has an elected UN Secretary General, the economic and social council elects 54 members and there is a trustee council which I think is asleep or mothballed or defunct or something. I'm probably wasting my time. You are as dumb as a bag of hammers.

Congratulations. You have managed to create a circular argument with yourself in the span of three posts. That's a record.

4466
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Russia Invades Ukraine
« on: March 08, 2014, 08:21:36 PM »
Which is why Russia has a permanent seat on the UN security council?
And as you know would be outvoted horribly by the USA, France, UK et al.

UN votes must be unanimous to pass. It only takes one vote against the proposal to stop it completely. Again, research your opinions, you dolt.

4467
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Dark Souls
« on: March 08, 2014, 05:44:32 PM »
I might get Dark Souls II because it advertises real PC controls. Glorious.

4468
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Russia Invades Ukraine
« on: March 08, 2014, 05:35:17 PM »
watched and managed by the UN to try to make it fair.
How does that make it fair? The UN pick sides and is overwhelmingly run by the West.

Which is why Russia has a permanent seat on the UN security council? Thork, I'm really starting to think you don't have an opinion at all. You just argue with the nearest poster to your reply and hope for the best. That, or you do have opinions and you don't bother to research them. You just make up an argument and try to work out all the details later.

4469
Arts & Entertainment / Re: The Elder Scrolls Online
« on: March 08, 2014, 05:06:21 PM »
An actual world where everyone could shoot lightning from their hands would be chaos 24/7.

4470
Technology & Information / Re: Ask Rushy about Bitcoins.
« on: March 07, 2014, 07:39:57 PM »
To further Thork's argument that it is a commodity and not a currency, Japan is going to treat it like a commodity and not regulate it as well as subject it to sales and capital gains tax,  http://techcrunch.com/2014/03/07/japan-government-has-no-plans-to-regulate-bitcoin-transactions-after-mt-goxs-demise/.  Though the link does say the UK is expected to declare it a currency.

The UK also revoked the 20% tax they implemented on Bitcoin in order to attract more startups. Also, whether any specific country treats Bitcoin as a currency or not is irrelevant. Bitcoin is a currency, if countries care or not to recognize that is a moot point.

4471
Technology & Information / Re: Ask Rushy about Bitcoins.
« on: March 07, 2014, 02:59:28 AM »
No. Foreign currencies are capital gains exempt. Trading stock is not.

I can go on holiday, make a killing from a currency exchange rate an no capital gains tax. Trading is different because its the only way a government can tax professional currency traders.

Bitcoin however always attracts capital gains tax, once the threshold is met. It isn't exempt in any way like foreign currencies. As you are lazy, I will quote for you
Quote from: http://www.capitalgainsallowance.com/capital-gains-tax-exemption/
There are a number of different assets which when disposed of, never attract capital gains tax, because the assets themselves are actually exempt. Examples of this include the foreign currency you purchase for yourself or your relatives whilst spending time abroad

and

Quote from: http://www.capitalgainsallowance.com/capital-gains-tax-exemption/
this transaction will be exempt from capital gains tax, so long as two conditions have been met. These are that the gift is not a form of trading stock which you have purchased for the purposes of reselling

There are no laws regarding bitcoin. Capital gains tax is an assumption, not a rule. Also, foreign exchange is not exempt. Did you even bother to read the link I gave you? I don't care what some random ass websites you go to. I posted Federal law. It might be different in the UK, but currency exchange is taxed in the US as a capital gain.

4472
Technology & Information / Re: Ask Rushy about Bitcoins.
« on: March 06, 2014, 10:38:45 PM »
Currencies are subject to capital gains tax. If I convert USD to EUR and EUR gains value, then I convert EUR back to USD. Then boom, I've just made a capital gain and I have to report it on my taxes.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/988

The only time it doesn't count as a gain or loss is if the exchange rate didn't change. I.E. instant currency conversions. If I hold EUR for a long time and then convert it, it qualifies as capital gains (or loss), and not income.

4473
Technology & Information / Re: Ask Rushy about Bitcoins.
« on: March 06, 2014, 07:24:17 PM »
The main point being your deposits are protected ... which they aren't with bitcoin as many bohemian investors are finding out.

Bitcoin is a currency, not a bank.

4474
Technology & Information / Re: Ask Rushy about Bitcoins.
« on: March 06, 2014, 12:31:05 AM »
One in the hand is never worth 2 in the bush.

I'm sure that notion has gotten you far in life.

There are thousands. Below is a list of the banks in just the UK. Yes, we have 5 massive banks that are on every high street, but we have hundreds of independent one branch banks. Mom and pop banks if you like. Most cater for high wealth individuals because most people just want to be able to use a cash card in any town, but if you want to put your savings in a small private bank, its no problem. You'll likely get better rates of interest too.
http://www.altiusdirectory.com/Finance/uk-banks-list.php

You also have hundreds in the states.
http://www.altiusdirectory.com/Finance/list-of-banks-in-usa.php

Those are more like credit unions than banks. They don't offer the complete services that a large bank can provide. They are also, funnily enough, more prone to losing your funds. Who would have thought?

4475
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Russia Invades Ukraine
« on: March 05, 2014, 07:49:34 PM »
Not at all.  I'm saying that, from Russia's perspective, they're not illegitimately invading another nation.  They're protecting the legitimately elected government from an unconstitutional coup.

No, they're keeping a revolution from turning a pro-Russia government into a pro-EU government, which would cost them their only deep warm water port. A EU Ukraine would devastate the Russian economy. This isn't at all about Ukraine itself, Russia is acting solely in Russia's best interest.

4476
Technology & Information / Re: Ask Rushy about Bitcoins.
« on: March 05, 2014, 07:44:52 PM »
Wow.  Bitcoins are being stolen all over the place. I guess storage isn't bank level yet.

This is because most, if not all, Bitcoin startups are currently run by guys in their early twenties with a lot of money and very little work experience which can not be trusted, especially since these small startups turned into multi-million dollar companies overnight.

I'm waiting to see what large Wall Street level companies such as Circle (www.circle.com) plan to do with Bitcoin. It takes a long time to get real money transmission companies in the works because of all the bureaucratic red tape. You don't see any Mom & Pop corner banks and its because starting or being a bank is not easy, cheap, or fast. Too many people treat these Bitcoin startups as banks when they're tinker toys at best when compared to a real multi-million dollar company.


4477
Technology & Information / Re: Ask Rushy about Bitcoins.
« on: March 05, 2014, 02:24:04 AM »
Hey Rushy, is Flexcoin a safe place to stash my bitcoins?

On the other hand, never mind.

A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

4478
Technology & Information / Re: Ask Rushy about Bitcoins.
« on: March 04, 2014, 05:20:45 AM »
Because it's irrelevant.

It isn't, though.

4479
Technology & Information / Re: Ask Rushy about Bitcoins.
« on: March 04, 2014, 02:50:07 AM »
Then why did you bring up dividends when bitcoins were compared to stocks?

Why not?

4480
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Russia Invades Ukraine
« on: March 04, 2014, 01:28:24 AM »
I'd like to know what exactly Russia have done that is illegal, that the US didn't do in Iraq, Vietnam or Afghanistan? Somehow the perception is Russia is doing something illegal. What exactly?

I don't know, something like invading one of its old satellite countries for no reason? The political unrest isn't nearly so bad that Ukraine had to be invaded by a large country.

I also see the US threatening to kick Russia out of the G8. I wasn't aware the US was in charge of the G8?

The US is in charge of the world. The G8 is part of the world.

Also, just wondering, whose side is China on? Unlike us, they seem to be minding their own business as usual.

China will try to nuke Japan when it thinks no one is looking.

Pages: < Back  1 ... 222 223 [224] 225 226 ... 240  Next >