1
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Bye Bye Abortion
« on: Today at 12:31:35 AM »
So yes, pedantry. Exactly pedantry.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Lackey has gone from this being the deep state reprogramming sheeple to complaining that the first ban passed after Roe v Wade was called the first ban after Roe v Wade. It’s a display of incompetence that may never be rivaled.Labeling the obvious facts I share as incompetence is mildly humorous. Thanks for the chuckle.
Now that you have posted the timeline, you can elucidate on how a person would or should travel from a state where, according to the media, abortion was not banned.Aww did da bad word hurt your feelings?Not at all.
I did watch your video by the way. It begs the question if you understand how time works or not. Please let us know.
Still refraining from profanity, the video actually begs the question as to whether or not you know how time works...
So, please, let us know.
Yeah. I gave you a timeline. Feel free to discuss it in detail. This law passing has no effect on the abortion done over a month before.
I take it back, maybe it’s entropy and not time that is giving you fits. So, just so you know, events in the present or future can not affect events in the past.
Aww did da bad word hurt your feelings?Not at all.
I did watch your video by the way. It begs the question if you understand how time works or not. Please let us know.
Still refraining from profanity, the video actually begs the question as to whether or not you know how time works...
So, please, let us know.
One wonders why a 10-year old girl had to travel to Indiana from Ohio to have an abortion, if Indiana is the first state to ban abortion after Roe v Wade...
Segue to more defense of the obvious media spin...
Points 3 and 4 represent the creation of fundamentally new technologies. The Digital Age in on point 5 represents people doing the same things they were already doing, but on a computer.
Joes looking to go in for a sniffer doodle.
Cute dress, with all the money we sent your daddy boy you could have had a tailor add two buttons and move those nips.
https://nypost.com/2022/07/26/zelensky-urges-biden-to-visit-ukraine/
Basically, every poll is taken from areas where the population is most dense."Mr Biden said the result showed "the majority of Americans agree that women should have access to abortion". - Evidently, the BBC thinks like Biden (for shame), that Kansans represent all of citizens of the US.Doesn’t basically every poll show that Americans are largely pro choice?
In fairness, he's not entirely wromg.
Random sampling means there is a higher chance of getting someone from a high dense area vs a low one. Tho you can adjust polls so they do random sampling of target regions to minimize that problem. But only so many people you should poll per area and if the area has like 1,000 people, well... No need to poll more than one or two.
But a city with a few million? Need to poll a several hundred.
Are you saying that it's perfectly legal for Trump to continue using the presidential seal at his golf course even when federal law says that it isn't?
This lawyer says it is legal - https://copyrightlately.com/trump-office-great-seal/
Reporting that a criminal complaint exists is not scamming anyone. You really struggle with factual content vs what your easily outraged persona believes.But it is another example of Trump's character and flagrant disregard for the law.^The effects of three-card monte journalism are demonstrated right here, as no criminality has been determined.
You were saying?
God takes no pleasure in the death of the wickedNo, only in the death of the innocent.
"If the scourge slay suddenly, He will laugh at the trial of the innocent." — Job 9:23
Job himself says that line in the midst of his despair, before he learns to humble himself before God and accept that his own misfortune means nothing in the face of divine wisdom. The Book of Job as a parable is morally dubious, but a line like that clearly isn't meant to be taken at face value.
Well, it seems that a disregard for the law isn't even established in this case, as that has not yet been determined.What has been the result of this blockbuster case!?!?!I never said that it's a "blockbuster case". But it is another example of Trump's character and flagrant disregard for the law. Then again, there are so many other investigations on against Trump that it's understandable that you might not care about this one.
Yes, there is a lot of news about all of these "investigations."
Lots of "three card monte," journalism taking place nowadays.
this guy is brain dead, send me the money MF
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/07/joe-biden-seems-think-sent-americans-checks-8000-video/
Yeah, definitely a gaf on his part. Probably got a bunch of numbers and summaries mixed up.
Gee, you better contact the DOJ and have them get right on this whopper of a case.When you describe something illegal, let us know for sure, okay?
Do you mean like illegally using the presidential seal for commercial purposes?Federal law prohibits knowingly using the printed or other likeness of the presidential seal “for the purpose of conveying, or in a manner reasonably calculated to convey, a false impression of sponsorship or approval by the Government of the United States.”
Violations of the law can result in fines, imprisonment up to six months or both.
They are investigating the matter. That’s all that I have claimed.No, you claimed Trump submits electors.Not some boot-lickers that Trump decides to submit...Direct quote.
Trump doesn't submit electors.
No president does.
So now, not only are you repeating fake news (news with no substance) you are making fake claims about the entire process.
The electors submitted for approval are those certified by the State and submitted to the electoral college. Not some boot-lickers that Trump decides to submit for the express purpose of fomenting confusion and dissent. Again, your desire to appear more ignorant and obtuse than you actually are is a terrible tactic that makes you seem ignorant, stupid or worse.But Trump doesn't submit electors.
Glad we got that cleared up.
You can now stop repeating fake news.
I would call that fake news.
Do you have some evidence electors made it to any official certificate?