1

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Bye Bye Abortion

« on: Today at 12:31:35 AM »

So yes, pedantry. Exactly pedantry.

2

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Bye Bye Abortion

« on: August 07, 2022, 05:05:29 PM »

Lackey is doing a real God of the Gaps arguement here.

3

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Bye Bye Abortion

« on: August 06, 2022, 08:32:54 PM »

Lackey has gone from this being the deep state reprogramming sheeple to complaining that the first ban passed after Roe v Wade was called the first ban after Roe v Wade. It’s a display of incompetence that may never be rivaled.

Labeling the obvious facts I share as incompetence is mildly humorous. Thanks for the chuckle.

I’m not labeling the facts you share as incompetence because that is nonsensical. I wonder what the next set of mental gymnastics you will attempt to perform to try and minimize the story of this girl, though. You’ve done a whole tumbling routine and fallen at every attempt.

4

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Bye Bye Abortion

« on: August 06, 2022, 08:03:55 PM »

Lackey has gone from this being the deep state reprogramming sheeple to complaining that the first ban passed after Roe v Wade was called the first ban after Roe v Wade. It’s a display of incompetence that may never be rivaled.

5

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Bye Bye Abortion

« on: August 06, 2022, 03:40:14 PM »

Aww did da bad word hurt your feelings?

I did watch your video by the way. It begs the question if you understand how time works or not. Please let us know.

Not at all.

Still refraining from profanity, the video actually begs the question as to whether or not you know how time works...

So, please, let us know.

Yeah. I gave you a timeline. Feel free to discuss it in detail. This law passing has no effect on the abortion done over a month before.

I take it back, maybe it’s entropy and not time that is giving you fits. So, just so you know, events in the present or future can not affect events in the past.

Now that you have posted the timeline, you can elucidate on how a person would or should travel from a state where, according to the media, abortion was not banned.

She travelled from Ohio to have an abortion in Indiana. You know that right?

6

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Bye Bye Abortion

« on: August 06, 2022, 02:55:20 PM »

Aww did da bad word hurt your feelings?

I did watch your video by the way. It begs the question if you understand how time works or not. Please let us know.

Not at all.

Still refraining from profanity, the video actually begs the question as to whether or not you know how time works...

So, please, let us know.

Yeah. I gave you a timeline. Feel free to discuss it in detail. This law passing has no effect on the abortion done over a month before.

I take it back, maybe it’s entropy and not time that is giving you fits. So, just so you know, events in the present or future can not affect events in the past.

7

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Bye Bye Abortion

« on: August 06, 2022, 12:23:13 PM »

Aww did da bad word hurt your feelings?

I did watch your video by the way. It begs the question if you understand how time works or not. Please let us know. 

8

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Bye Bye Abortion

« on: August 06, 2022, 11:49:38 AM »

One wonders why a 10-year old girl had to travel to Indiana from Ohio to have an abortion, if Indiana is the first state to ban abortion after Roe v Wade...

Segue to more defense of the obvious media spin...

Are you saying you don’t understand how time works?  Have you noticed the weeks separating her abortion and the passing of the law? Or did your YouTube overlord not tell you of the time-like separation of these events in space-time?

Just so you can’t deflect here is a brief timeline:

• an abortion performed on a ten year girl, victim of an alleged rape, was reported by the doctor on July 2nd, 2022
• For the next few weeks you made a series of poorly reasoned assertions attempting to poke holes in the story and failed
• August 6th, 2022 the Indiana legislature passed a law banning nearly all abortions.
• August 6th, 2022 the Indiana governor signs the law but even still, it does not come in to effect until September 15th, 2022.

So in short, what the fuck are you talking about?

9

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Old Politicians

« on: August 04, 2022, 12:56:33 PM »

Points 3 and 4 represent the creation of fundamentally new technologies. The Digital Age in on point 5 represents people doing the same things they were already doing, but on a computer.

The semi-conductor and the transistor are fundamentally new technologies which spurred the digital revolution.

10

Technology & Information / Re: Steam Deck

« on: August 04, 2022, 12:46:05 AM »

Measured at 11.7 inches.

That’s what he said.

11

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden

« on: August 03, 2022, 11:01:11 PM »

Joes looking to go in for a sniffer doodle.

Cute dress, with all the money we sent your daddy boy you could have had a tailor add two buttons and move those nips.

https://nypost.com/2022/07/26/zelensky-urges-biden-to-visit-ukraine/

Are you ok?

12

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Bye Bye Abortion

« on: August 03, 2022, 10:56:26 PM »

"Mr Biden said the result showed "the majority of Americans agree that women should have access to abortion". - Evidently, the BBC thinks like Biden (for shame), that Kansans represent all of citizens of the US.

Doesn’t basically every poll show that Americans are largely pro choice?

Basically, every poll is taken from areas where the population is most dense.

In fairness, he's not entirely wromg.
Random sampling means there is a higher chance of getting someone from a high dense area vs a low one.  Tho you can adjust polls so they do random sampling of target regions to minimize that problem.  But only so many people you should poll per area and if the area has like 1,000 people, well... No need to poll more than one or two.
But a city with a few million?  Need to poll a several hundred.

I’m not sure Lackey’s point is fair because he is asserting that polls over sample people living in cities without any evidence.

13

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: August 01, 2022, 01:13:54 AM »

Are you saying that it's perfectly legal for Trump to continue using the presidential seal at his golf course even when federal law says that it isn't?

This lawyer says it is legal - https://copyrightlately.com/trump-office-great-seal/

You found a lawyer to agree with you? On the internet? Incredible.

14

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: July 31, 2022, 08:25:09 PM »

Reporting that a criminal complaint exists is not scamming anyone. You really struggle with factual content vs what your easily outraged persona believes.

But it is another example of Trump's character and flagrant disregard for the law. 

^The effects of three-card monte journalism are demonstrated right here, as no criminality has been determined.

You were saying?

Would you like to ask a clarifying question or just put together two quotes as if that constitutes an arguement and not a shit post?

15

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: God takes no pleasure in the death of the wicked..

« on: July 31, 2022, 05:30:09 PM »

God takes no pleasure in the death of the wicked

No, only in the death of the innocent.

"If the scourge slay suddenly, He will laugh at the trial of the innocent." — Job 9:23

Job himself says that line in the midst of his despair, before he learns to humble himself before God and accept that his own misfortune means nothing in the face of divine wisdom. The Book of Job as a parable is morally dubious, but a line like that clearly isn't meant to be taken at face value.

There are lots of things in the Bible that aren’t meant to be taken literally but still are. Don’t forget Young Earth Creationists are real.

16

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: July 31, 2022, 05:06:23 PM »

What has been the result of this blockbuster case!?!?!

I never said that it's a "blockbuster case".  But it is another example of Trump's character and flagrant disregard for the law.  Then again, there are so many other investigations on against Trump that it's understandable that you might not care about this one.

Well, it seems that a disregard for the law isn't even established in this case, as that has not yet been determined.

Yes, there is a lot of news about all of these "investigations."

Lots of "three card monte," journalism taking place nowadays.

Reporting that a criminal complaint exists is not scamming anyone. You really struggle with factual content vs what your easily outraged persona believes.

17

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden

« on: July 31, 2022, 01:17:06 AM »

this guy is brain dead, send me the money MF

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/07/joe-biden-seems-think-sent-americans-checks-8000-video/

Yeah, definitely a gaf on his part.  Probably got a bunch of numbers and summaries mixed up.

The guy is old and not all there. He needs a rest.

18

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: July 30, 2022, 05:29:14 PM »

When you describe something illegal, let us know for sure, okay?

Do you mean like illegally using the presidential seal for commercial purposes?

Federal law prohibits knowingly using the printed or other likeness of the presidential seal “for the purpose of conveying, or in a manner reasonably calculated to convey, a false impression of sponsorship or approval by the Government of the United States.”

Violations of the law can result in fines, imprisonment up to six months or both.

Gee, you better contact the DOJ and have them get right on this whopper of a case.

Weird way of admitting you were wrong.

19

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: July 29, 2022, 09:23:24 PM »

They are investigating the matter. That’s all that I have claimed.

No, you claimed Trump submits electors.

Not some boot-lickers that Trump decides to submit...

Direct quote.

Trump doesn't submit electors.

No president does.

This is the substance of the allegation. That Trump and his cronies conspired to submit a fake slate of electors to congress with the express purpose of obstructing the certification of the electoral votes. You have finally caught up.

So now, not only are you repeating fake news (news with no substance) you are making fake claims about the entire process.

Incorrect. The DOJ is indeed investigating the matter. That is substantially true and that is what the news reported. It isn’t fake and I haven’t misrepresented that. But keep on being a Trump lackey.

20

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: July 29, 2022, 07:40:07 PM »

The electors submitted for approval are those certified by the State and submitted to the electoral college. Not some boot-lickers that Trump decides to submit for the express purpose of fomenting confusion and dissent. Again, your desire to appear more ignorant and obtuse than you actually are is a terrible tactic that makes you seem ignorant, stupid or worse.

But Trump doesn't submit electors.

Glad we got that cleared up.

You can now stop repeating fake news.

They are investigating the matter. That’s all that I have claimed.

I would call that fake news.

Do you have some evidence electors made it to any official certificate?

There was an entire session of Congress on Jan. 6, 2021 devoted to unsealing the certificates of ascertainment and certifying electors. If you wish to view the certificates of ascertainment, you would have to contact the Office of the Federal Register and perhaps file a FOIA request.