If you do a google-search on this image - about the first 200 hits are from Flat Earth sites (many from this one) that trumpet this as definite proof of the great ice wall.
The picture is proof of an ice wall at the Antarctic coast. How is it not?
This post proves to me you are a troll. Since he said "it's actually a photograph of a gigantic iceberg called "B15A" that blocked McMurdo Sound sometime in 2000 and floated around for years as it only slowly broke apart." I can only imagine you are toying with him.
Glaciers, ice fronts, ice shelves, are all part of the Antarctic coast. If you go to Antarctica you will see a lot of ice walls. Walls of ice inhibit almost all of the coastline.
As they do on the coast of Greenland and many points north. Antarctica is cold, ice forms, glaciers slide towards the sea and ice walls are apparent. It proves nothing.
Many seem to be coming here questioning the existence of ice walls at Antarctica. They most certainly exist. The question should not be about the existence of ice walls on the Antarctic coast, the question should be about the length of the Antarctic coast. The physical features at the coast exist in both Round Earth and Flat Earth models. It is the length that is in question.
Tom-
That is exactly the point.
The length of the coast line of Antartica is known to be about 11,000 Miles.
There is ample evidence and proof of this.
Unless all photographs, maps, geodesic surveys, etc. of Antarctica are fakes.
But there is absolutely no evidence nor proof of a so-called "ice wall" that would have to be 78,000 miles in circumference.
The only "flat earth model" I have seen is the well known Unipolar Azimuthal Equidistant Projection (of the globe) with all of its distortion.
That ice berg isn't even part of the coastline.
Notice the gap.
It has broken away from the coastline.
If I might be pardoned for saying so......
Tom, I think you may have just shot yourself in the foot.
My condolonces.
Of course that is just my "IMHO".