Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - mister bickles

Pages: < Back  1 [2] 3 4 ... 10  Next >
21
"the mark of the Beast" will be some-thing that is, still, more or less hidden.....
personally, i lean towards the view(s) of the likes of Doug Hamp, L A Marzulli, Chuck Missler and Tom Horn who contend that it will be some-thing (maybe a "vaccination", maybe a bio-chip implant vis á vis "trans-humanism") that will, in effect, actually alter yr DNA code some-how so that it is no longer human;

yr DNA will then either resemble or very closely imitate "fallen angel DNA";

once that occurs, you are no longer fully human and, thus, are, de facto and de jure, "irredeemable", as it were;
(the gross skin infections./sores that appear on those who have 'received the Mark' [as per Revelation of St John] may well be an initial "immune reaction" from the human immune system to 'alien'/demonic DNA trying to integrate itself into the formerly human metabolism....its quite possible that there could well be some 'reptilian' aspect/appearance to this because all the evidence, both anecdotal and circumstantial, seems to indicate that demons/fallen angels [two different things, of course] have a 'reptilian'-type appearance....although they are able to temporarily disguise this )

it is very unlikely that "the Mark of the Beast" will be some-thing as straight-forward as an RFID implant or, even, a tattoo....because both of those could either be cut out or removed.....

that said, it is, most certainly, possible that the 'Mark' could be accompanied by some clearly, distinguishable physical feature.....perhaps an alteration in the human physiogonomy to a vague, reptilian 'resemblance'    :-\

as for their being demonic 'bases' on the Moon......that's not really possible because the Moon, AFA most FETs can tell, ain't really a 3d object....in all likelihood, its some sort of 2d concave, mirror set up....... see Crrow777's stuff on Y-tb with respect to this......
(how-ever, it is v likely that there are, indeed, alien/demonic bases under the Earth, under mountains or, even, under the oceans)

one interesting perspective on this End Times deception is how, in the light of the increasing revelations abt the FE and the actual nature of the Universe, Satan could now pull off his "great deception"....which, of course, all hinges on a spherical Earth, solar system, other planets, galaxies &c scenario;
just consider the mind-boggling n° of science fiction books and films over the last five or six decades that have 'pused'/promulgated this view of the Universe  :o

its my under-standing that "the Antichrist" was going to be presented as some sort of 'alien'/super-human saviour from another 'planet' or, maybe, dimension......but....it seems that this will all fall in a heap very shortly as per FET;
(after all: there's not that many in the world today who would waste their time with a mere 'human'-type politician....no matter how charismatic...most poliitcians these days seem to be abt as popular as child molesters :(  )



22
what awaits you if you die this very night?



23
Jesus Christ can save from the gutter-most to the utter-most....BUT...no man cometh to the Son unless the Father draweth him......   :o



24
Marc Bolan, of T Rex fame (who i used to listen to as a v small 'nipper'  ::) ) is reputed to have "sold his soul to the Devil" for fame and fortune;

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Bolan ;

wonder where he is now and if he regrets his few, brief yrs of fame?

on that note.....an interesting little 'read'......

http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Miscellaneous/satanic_roots_of_rock.htm ;
( much more here )


John Lennon....where is he now?


John Lennon publicly mocked the Lord Jesus Christ;
that was stupid, stupid, STUPID;   :P
@ the very least, he should'v kept his thoughts to him-self or close friends;
interesting, that, whilst crying out to Jesus in Hell, the Lord wouldn't even look @ him!  :(
how pathetic!

can "deals with the Devil" be annulled?
YES!
but only by the blood of Jesus Christ and only if you fully and sincerely repent and turn to Him and are filled with the Holy Ghost!
every 'concession' that the Devil gives you has steel cables of conditions attached.....its not worth it :(
(he who 'dines with the Devil' must foot the bill!)
only a fool would willingly 'deal' with a psychopath!   :-\

instead, "make a deal" with Jesus Christ.... His yoke is easy and His burden is light   ;D

25
Philosophy, Religion & Society / "Planned Parenthood"
« on: August 25, 2015, 01:55:50 PM »
these filthy baby butchers will be torn apart by demons of blood and murder in the pits and belly of HELL!   >:(

unless they fall down on their knees and repent in dust and ashes before the Most High God

(a likely occurrence? not really!....therefore....their fate shall be unspeakable.....better that they had ne'er been born or cast into the sea with a mill-stone 'round their necks!)



their ultimate destination.....



Almighty God is watching them....with eyes of blazing anger!  >:(
(because the angels of these little ones are ever before His Face)

http://chick.com/reading/tracts/1009/1009_01.asp ;



 

26
Science & Alternative Science / nukes are NONSENSE!
« on: August 24, 2015, 12:39:26 PM »
Quote
mister bickles, it is common courtesy to at least make a comment about some of the points in the video

the whole theory of nuclear explosions is like ZPG/over-unity but with much less credibility...i.e: you get more energy outputted than inputted :(

the other thing i should'v mentioned is that most of the post-WWII nuke tests used up the huge stock-pile of TNT that was left over from WWII;

what else?

oh, yeh.....
the video footage analysis.....not 100% sure abt this because, let's face it, VCRs first appeared in the early 1980s.....so.....there would'v been plenty of time for people to analyse the footage of nukes.....but....then again.....you didn't have the i/net until over 20yrs l8r......so........   ???

then...you have the bit of that nuclear scientist actually eating some r/active waste.....

the whole thing's just another big, fat LIE.....   >:(




28
Flat Earth Theory / Re: Gravity once again
« on: August 13, 2015, 10:17:33 AM »
Quote
Then provide some mathematics please

better yet, provide practical and experimental demonstrations....that's what science is all abt!



(there's also that mine experiment conducted in the late nineteenth century, i think.....with the two plumb-bobs down a mine-shaft......instead of veering slightly towards each other as would be expected by conventional Newtonian gravitational theory, they actually veered away from each other...as you would expect if 'gravity' was some-thing pressing down from above rather than [pulling towards] from underneath/centre of the Earth....sorry!...i forget the actual name of the experiment....but....i will look it up [if i remember].....unless some-one else knows & can post it.....ta!)

☞ edit ☜
couldn't be bothered with another 'post' so....am appending this.....
http://www.waykiwayki.com/2015/07/flat-earth-gravity-is-hoax.html ;

29
not disputing yr abilities, per se....but there's a dffrnc between assembling some-thing in "kit" form and having a detailed knowledge of all the electronic components/chips in a device;

you'd have to have a (reliable) schematic of the architecture and be able to analyse and interpret all the components and their interactions;


Quote
The transmitters can be anywhere,  they don't actually need to be in orbit,  all that is required is that the transmitters transmit their actual location,  if they don't then the system will fail to report your location correctly

pretty much what i'm saying, eh?

again: there is not the slightest proof/hard evidence that these GPS sttlts are up there.....or, indeed, that any stllts are up there, period.....or...that rockets can get up past the Thermosphere.....in fact...i'd be sorely tempted to say that the WWII-era V2 rockets most likely achieved the maximum alt' possible  :(

in fact: i think that what we're dealing with here is, again, nothing more than souped-up WWII tech'

30
That video is bogus,  the loop of paper is attached to the rocket, so it will stop the thing from moving.   Most of what the guy says is actually correct,  until he fall flat on his face with the loop of paper

until some-one can post/produce a convincing vid' of a rocket actually working in a vacuum in a laboratory, i'm going with the Y-tb vid' as being a reasonable & valid practical demonstration/experiment ;
(all that counts in the end....not gooble-de-gook mathematics which can be made to say any-thing!)


Quote
As for 100%,  certainty.   I am 100% certain....[.......] 

famous last words  :(
are you now or have you ever been "100% certain" of the moon missions  ::)


Quote
Since I know where I am,  I know the satellites are where they are supposed to be.   They can't transmit false information and still give accurate location fix

how do you know all that?
have you been involved in the construction and launch of stllts?
have you gone up into 'space' and actually checked ?


Quote
I have a GPS receiver connected to a server being used as a network time reference,  When look at the satellite constellation.  I can see the current positions of all the GPS satellites the receiver can see

are you a fully qualified electronic engineer ?
(IEEE certified)
are you able to take apart yr GPS 'receiver' and analyse every single component and explain in detail how they all work and interact?


 
Quote
If they are ground based towers,  then the towers are moving.   If they are balloons or stratellites,  then they are 12,000 miles away,  if the signals are faked then the thing that's faking the signals is in orbit 12,000 miles away and moving

and you know this....how   ???

Quote
Yes I'm 100% certain GPS is satellite based and works,  exactly as they say it does

nice to be that certain...abt any-thing   :(

Quote
Flight tracking,  Rocketry and Gravity can wait for another day

another day.....another nail in the coffin for the "round"/spherical Earth & Big Bang 'universe'   ::)

31
i post these personal testimonies (one of former USMC staff sergeant Shawn Weed and one of a former atheist, Brian Melvin [now no longer an atheist!  ::) ] ) because they provide unusual insights into what "Hell" actually is;

i contend that neither of these testimonies contradict Scripture but they certainly give additional insight;

Weed's testimony provides an interesting perspective on what may lie beyond the Earth 'snow-globe'...a chaotic region of quantum instability and uncertainty (Enoch refers to such a region in the BoE);

(for me, the really unsettling thing abt Weed's testimony is that, apparently, he did not even know he was dead..... :o ....he actually thought he was still alive, moving around, sitting down, walking, talking &c.....in that light...."death" doesn't sound so traumatic after all, does it?  ::) .....clearly, its not 'deat', per se, that you should fear but what comes after......that is: unless yr right with Jesus Christ.....then...."the coast is clear"   :-B  )

Melvin's testimony shows that Hell is not necessarily all fire, brim-stone and torture....although that is, certainly, a major part of it.....most likely reserved for the worst of sinners  :(

his account of "cubes" is very interesting....considering that they are sort of "fifth dimensional" (Dr Who fans will recognise this allusion)......


Shawn Weed...


Brian Melvin.....


32
Flat Earth Media / Re: Book of Enoch and the flat Earth
« on: August 12, 2015, 12:49:06 PM »
you don't have to go out and buy it;
you should be able to dwn/ld it as a "pdf" from here.....  http://sacred-texts.com/ ;

the BoE makes several references to Hell, BTW!
(in fact, Dante got much of his inspiration from the BoE or so they say!)

why its not accepted as canon by the Christian church is beyond my understanding;
its quoted as Scripture in the Epistle of Jude and, according to the Joseph B Lumpkin copy ("Lost Books of the Bible") that i have (which also includes Jasher and Jubilees as well as the Lost Books of Eden and the Book of the Giants), it is referenced both directly and indirectly in many places of the OT....including Psalms and the Book of Job;
it was also found amongst the Dead Sea scrolls which would seem to give it an impramatur of Scriptural authority and accuracy also.....

personally...i think it was excluded because of satanic interference!

why do i say that?

because, apparently, it was excluded by the Council of Laodicea https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_of_Laodicea ;

if you read the Book of Revelation, you will quickly discover how Jesus Christ viewed the Church at Laodicea  :(

BoE contains many things that people in these latter times need to know!

33
The air density in the thermosphere is close to zero

OK....then....but....you can't have yr cake and eat it too, eh?   ::)


Quote
I have seen that Mark Sargent video,  what he doesn't appear to know is that those tracking services don't use GPS, they mostly use ADS-B,  which is VHF and radar based and as soon as you get out of range of land the tracking will change to an estimated position.  ( Or just stop tracking)   There are other systems that use satellite telemetry to monitor aircraft performance parameters,  but not all airlines opt to pay for that service,  and I don't know if any of the tracking web services can access that data anyway.  There is also ACARS, which can use satellite links.   Following the disappearance of MH370 there is likely to be a move to get mandatory remote GPS tracking  on all airlines. 

Anyway, the important point I am making is that we know with 100% certaintythat the GPS satellites are in orbit exactly where they are supposed to be,  the signal cannot be repeated or reflected because the time of transmission is a part of the position calculation,  and the actual satellite position is contained in the data stream.  If the satellites were not in those orbits the system would not work

uh....see....now....that's where i smell a big, fat rat....that right there.....  "100% certainty" ....we don't know ANY-thing with 100% crtnty;
even mathematical theorems ain't 100% crtn .........  to be 100% certain of any-thing....you would have to be 100% certain of yr premises via a system of deductive logic....but....almost all science uses "inferential" logic....or probable inferences....
for me, all that is 100% certain is the Word of God;
any-thing deducible from that is valid;


Quote
There are ground based GPS transmitters also,  but they are for AGPS or DGPS systems to provide higher accuracy, they still require the satellite systems.   

Could the transmitters be located elsewhere, other than in orbit?  Yes they could be anywhere, provided that they accurately transmit their REAL position, then the GPS receiver can use that information to calculate a position fix.   Because we can look at the actual  positional  data coming from the GPS transmitters,  we know with certainty that they are in orbit, exactly where they are supposed to be

that still doesn't explain why you can track 'planes in the northern hemisphere but not in the sthrn Pacific region;
look....let's face it...."radio location" (which is, basically, what GPS is) originated in WWII;
with a few tweaks and twiddling of knobs and electronic upgrades.....its more than reasonable to argue that, basically, that's all we got now....oh...and...if rockets don't work in the vacuum of 'space', then, how did the stllts get up there?
(unless they're all in v low Earth orbit.....but could they be?....if the Theory of Gravity is bogus too....then.....how can they stay in 'orbit'?  ???  )


re: WWII;

the OBOE system & its successor.....the Gee-H system
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oboe_(navigation) ;

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gee-H_(navigation) ;

the civilian successor to the above....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distance_measuring_equipment ;

could GPS be a modified version of these?

34
the overwhelming majority of jews (whether secular or 'religious') actively and viciously oppose Christianity;

if they didn't do that, then, i wouldn't have much of an issue with them;

apart, of course, from their Holocaustianity....which, even if it was true (which a 10-yr old could tell you it ain't :( ), its way past high time that they SHUT UP abt;

i think Norman Finkelstein (one of the small handful of jews i have any time for) said it best when he called it a scam industry

35
The themosphere is very high temperature,  but bugger all heat capacity,  you would get hotter in a sauna than the thermosphere

uh.....'course....we just gotta take the word of NASA & their "ilk" for that 1, right?
and....you see.....here's yr problem with them....if the so-called moon missions were a hoax....(for which there is not inconsiderable evidence)....then....every-thing else they say is, more likely than not, also bogus  :(
no!
we just don't know 100% for sure abt those 2000º temps...i'm plonking for there being enough of an 'atmosphere' to transfer most or all of that intense heat.....


Quote
Satellite dishes are at angles which are directly in proportion to the lattitude,  look at a satellite dish on the equator, they are pointing at an arc which goes directly overhead, or for the right satellite it will be straight up.   And in far north finland they are almost pointing at the horizon

i'm only going by what the FEs on Y-tb say, quite frankly...
they've got numerous photos of sat' dishes in numerous locations and they're all pointing in the same direction;
all the ones i'v seen here in Aussie also do that....although i didn't take any notice of that until i stumbled across that little tit-bit on Y-tb....


Quote
There are no GPS dead spots,  what gave you that idea?    I have used GPS on a plane in mid pacific.

it was the southern Pacific, mostly.....
again....i'm going by what Sargent and others have said vis á vis flights "dropping off" planefinder sites on the web....
(in the southern Pacific....especially Aucklnd/Syd to Santiago/Buns Ars route )

36
Flat Earth Theory / Re: Gravity once again
« on: August 11, 2015, 10:04:36 AM »

why aren't scientists speaking out abt the FE?


because flat earthers did not yet produce anything scientific.


not quite!
its because of the reasons i listed and, also, because the anti-God atheistic materialists ("science falsely so called!") have re-defined "science" to some-thing called methodological naturalism

38
there could well be some satellites stuck to the under-side of the dome covering the Earth.....that'd make them geo-stationary;

(but...then again....that would mean the rockets carrying them would have to penetrate through the Thermosphere....highly unlikely)

AFA sat' dishes are concerned, they all seem to point upwards @ the same angle..... abt  45°;


as per GPS....there is no explanation as why it seems to "conk out" in the sthrn hemisphere over the Pacific Ocean...unless there ain't any satellites/GPS to start with.....and it all works on a combo' of WWII-era/souped up "radio beacons" &  mobile 'phone cell towers.....which would certainly explain the huge "dead spots" in the southern Pacific  :o

39
methinks you doth protest too much, jew!   >:(





40
Lutec wasn't one that we looked at but, it's yet another rotary magnetic machine,  and their claims of 440% over-unity were based on miscalculations of the energy in a chopped sine wave
"miscalculations" or not, in the practical demonstrations, the machines ran as per you'd expect for over-unity!

Quote
I don't know about large men in sunglasses,  but I have heard there are a lot of extremely pissed off investors who were defrauded
first i heard of it.....

Quote
Their web site has long since vanished
or was made to....or they were told to shut it down....
again...as i'v said....its very easy for T[jew]PTB to intimidate Aussies because the overwhelming majority are helpless and dis-armed!


Quote
A quick google search turned up this http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/comment/lutec.htm
either a [jew]PTB shill or, more likely, some Aussie with too much time on his/her hands engaging in "tall poppy syndrome"; a national past-time indulged in by the lazy, the shiftless and the down-right stupid against the hard-working/achievers, industrious, creative, motivated and intelligent....   :(

Quote
I noticed in that article that John Newman claimed they stole his design   Now that's interesting....
not really.....
the only person that could claim the design as their own would be Nikola Tesla....who has been dead now for ¾-of-a-century
  ::)

Quote
Beware of scammers who claim their work is somehow related to Tesla's work,   I think they just trot out the  Nikola Tesla name thinking it somehow increases their credibility
maybe.....but...the biggest "scammers" are T[jew]PTB who push planet-destroying fossil fuels when, as all the evidence indicates, there are free and abundant sources of energy; Tesla's being the simplest and the most abundant....

Pages: < Back  1 [2] 3 4 ... 10  Next >