41
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Fallout series
« on: September 03, 2014, 02:31:07 PM »
that was terrible.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I'm sorry but I'm inclined to disagree. Monarchs have a history of violence and corruption (or giving into such).Of course. There are bad kings and they make life miserable. But a good King is far better than any democracy you could hope for.
Let's say I run a company that recycles household plastics. How much would it cost to get the right politician to force every council to provide a bin for this in every home? Bearing in mind a politician earns about £70,000 a year.Monarchy is a pretty good system as the richest person is the least likely to be corrupt.
I don't understand how this could possibly be true?
Now how much is it going to cost me to do that with King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia?
Kings aren't exempt from corruption, but a good king might never ever be corrupt.
Its pointless. You always end up with two parties that will invariably make all the same bad choices as both are lobbied full time by global companies.
Monarchy is a pretty good system as the richest person is the least likely to be corrupt.
Right pathetic looking, the British Isles will be. The Scottish were always treated much better than the Irish so I don't see much motivation for independence, really.Independence is the motivation for independence.
I just appreciate that they're getting their own vote on it. If being independent is going to screw them over then at least they tried. It's not necessarily all about Braveheart either. Plenty of Scots hated the union in the 1700s and that was quite some time before Mel Gibson.
The flaw in your argument is that you would essentially surround Israel with a billion strong horde of disgruntled Muslims.