91
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Covid-19 vaccine two shots
« Last post by Lord Dave on April 12, 2024, 02:23:14 PM »Incorrect.I think you fail to realize these are reports that have been screened by the CDC and have been found to be legitimate.https://www.linkedin.com/posts/draryan_cdc-releases-780000-covid-vaccine-injury-activity-7181846614393655296-leK2
"Despite what the CDC says, it’s unclear whether the agency was asleep at the wheel or intentionally steering the Titanic into an iceberg."
780,000...that is a fairly large number.
780,000 people who posted whatever they wanted at anytime. Yep, totally legitimate and helpful and in no way able to be abused.
"Talaat says the best source of research stemming from VAERS is the CDC, because they are able to trace the records backward and verify them."
https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2022/what-vaers-is-and-isnt
Which hasn't been done.
https://icandecide.org/v-safe-data/
Read em for yourself. The raw data (which you are referencing) has alot of "no." "None" "just got the shot" "soreness" , etc...
So its much, much less than what you wrote.
The CDC has screened the VAERS.
ICAN has absolutely nothing to do with the report issued by the CDC.
You are being highly disingenuous with your posts, when there is absolutely no reason to do so except to spread deliberately false information.
Then why did the link you gave us, link to it?
And why are the two excel files showing all 780,000 messages you claimed were all damaging symptoms?
Seems suspicous that the link would claim 780,000 people had damaging symptoms from a "report" but the 780,000 messages don't support 780,000 damaging symptoms.