Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I think Action80 is voting for the pedophile.I would never even consider voting for someone who is a pedophile.
I, of course, can't tell you because her ruling has no legal basis. Lots of words and quotes, but no basis.Here you go, you troll.
Just pony up with all the trips, when they took place, and all the parents, or just stfu with your bullshit...Anyway, Rushy's fun pedantry aside, assuming it will be Harris like literally everyone is saying it will be, are you gonna vote for the senile old pedophile?I am wondering who the senile old pedophile could be?
Care to enlighten?
I mean, you are hanging your hat on a for-shit rack still?
Of course there was always only one candidate who took frequent trips on Jeffrey Epstein's Lolita Express and has multiple documented cases of millions in hush money being paid to the parents of underage kids.
Anyway, Rushy's fun pedantry aside, assuming it will be Harris like literally everyone is saying it will be, are you gonna vote for the senile old pedophile?I am wondering who the senile old pedophile could be?
And what is the legal basis of her ruling and why was the trial allowed to even start?I thought you claimed you read the ruling?
With no legal standing. And ignoring precident from the last 100+ years.With plenty of legal standing and change has always been your baby (as in the diapers on Joe).
But sure, she's in charge and if she wants to help Trump, that's her business, right?
I do not need to try that again, since the persons running the show declared it does apply.Which does not apply since congress already made that unnecessary for special prosecutors. So try again.Oh hey, let's forget the confirmation process all together, right?
Oh hey, found the authority.
28USC 533.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/533#:~:text=28%20U.S.%20Code%20%C2%A7%20533%20%2D%20Investigative%20and%20other%20officials%3B%20appointment,-U.S.%20Code&text=to%20conduct%20such%20other%20investigations,directed%20by%20the%20Attorney%20General.
You know, in case you weren't trolling.
Hawk tuah...
Oh hey, let's forget the confirmation process all together, right?
Oh hey, found the authority.
28USC 533.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/533#:~:text=28%20U.S.%20Code%20%C2%A7%20533%20%2D%20Investigative%20and%20other%20officials%3B%20appointment,-U.S.%20Code&text=to%20conduct%20such%20other%20investigations,directed%20by%20the%20Attorney%20General.
You know, in case you weren't trolling.
LMMFAO!!!Well, that explains why you're unemployed.If you hire by ability and not ideology...
LMFAO!
Why would he need to pardon himself if he can just order the DoJ to drop charges?You can ask the other bot as to why he believes Trump would choose to pardon himself.
But he's correct: it's unknown if they can. Never been done before. And as we know... Trump can do no wrong. His impeachment would never go through. Not unless democrats controlled both houses. Nor would he lose support. Why would he? None of his supporters care if he's guilty of some made up, witch-hunt crime. Hell, they don't even care that he pushed to make the covid vaccine that's part of the plan to wipe out humanity. Never even mention it. Because they are loyal. Blind loyalty. They'd kill for him. Wouldn't you?
" ...is there a statute in the United States Code that authorizes the appointment of Special Counsel Smith to conduct this prosecution? After careful study of this seminal issue, the answer is no."But that wasn't the ruling. The ruling was that all special counsels were unconstitutional. All of them.The correct proper way to appoint special counsel is for Congress to approve the appointment.https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-classified-documents-case-dismissed-07-15-24/index.htmlJack Smith had no standing, AT ALL.
Trump wins. His Judge has basically said all special appointments are unconstitutional and thus the case is dismissed, which breaks from every other judge whose had this. Also, she did this after over a year! Why didn't she dismiss it sooner? Because she's corrupt.
Mark my words: if Trump wins, he'll appointment her to SCOTUS.
Ok, so what was the correct, proper, standing person or group that should have been used? The DoJ? The President? Mitch McConnel?
That is why Mueller never went anywhere and why Smith was going nowhere.
Truman Show shit.
The correct proper way to appoint special counsel is for Congress to approve the appointment.https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-classified-documents-case-dismissed-07-15-24/index.htmlJack Smith had no standing, AT ALL.
Trump wins. His Judge has basically said all special appointments are unconstitutional and thus the case is dismissed, which breaks from every other judge whose had this. Also, she did this after over a year! Why didn't she dismiss it sooner? Because she's corrupt.
Mark my words: if Trump wins, he'll appointment her to SCOTUS.
Ok, so what was the correct, proper, standing person or group that should have been used? The DoJ? The President? Mitch McConnel?
