1

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Man or bear?

« Last post by Shane on Today at 05:19:16 PM »

The best part is they still don't get it. All these certain women who are making a big deal about this talk about how strong and independent they are and how they don't need men. But when a bunch of men say okay cool then you can protect yourselves. They get all butthurt. "This is why we choose the bear. Because you're all horrible men." Wait, I thought you guys said you didn't need us.

2

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Man or bear?

« Last post by Rushy on Today at 04:37:06 PM »

You're in the woodlands of northern Canada, it's cold. The sun is setting. And yet, you see something in the distance. What could it be? It could be a man. It could be a bear. Which one do you choose?

3

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« Last post by Lord Dave on May 08, 2024, 05:40:54 PM »

of course the president should be absolutely above the law, that's exactly the idea this country was founded on

Only if they're white men tho.  Women and blacks are excluded.

4

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« Last post by garygreen on May 08, 2024, 05:04:32 PM »

of course the president should be absolutely above the law, that's exactly the idea this country was founded on

5

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« Last post by Lord Dave on May 08, 2024, 03:56:42 PM »

Jack Smith is such a total fuck up, the judge cannot even decide when to begin the trial.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/judge-delays-trump-documents-trial-wont-set-new-date-5645658?utm_source=RTNews&src_src=RTNews&utm_campaign=rtbreaking-2024-05-07-5&src_cmp=rtbreaking-2024-05-07-5&utm_medium=email&est=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa%2BcidhsJxcPN%2FrQut3NAH7F5ww0LIzwgbOIBKcVOYUPVwjDotRvn

Two more weeks.

Considering all the hearings are motions from the defence that the judge decided to grant, likely because she's a Trump lover, I disagree that he 'fucked up'.

6

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« Last post by honk on May 08, 2024, 03:30:53 PM »

Yes, it's almost as if one party in this case is doing everything they can to keep delaying this trial until the election in the hopes of winning the presidency and making all their legal problems go away. I wonder who it could be?

7

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« Last post by Action80 on May 08, 2024, 02:23:08 PM »

Jack Smith is such a total fuck up, the judge cannot even decide when to begin the trial.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/judge-delays-trump-documents-trial-wont-set-new-date-5645658?utm_source=RTNews&src_src=RTNews&utm_campaign=rtbreaking-2024-05-07-5&src_cmp=rtbreaking-2024-05-07-5&utm_medium=email&est=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa%2BcidhsJxcPN%2FrQut3NAH7F5ww0LIzwgbOIBKcVOYUPVwjDotRvn

Two more weeks.

8

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« Last post by Lord Dave on May 07, 2024, 08:07:36 PM »

Is the order relevant to the charges?
No.Yes.

FTFY.

Why?
Which of the charges relates to the order or position of the documents inside the box?

9

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« Last post by Action80 on May 07, 2024, 07:36:57 PM »

Is the order relevant to the charges?
No.Yes.

FTFY.

10

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« Last post by Lord Dave on May 07, 2024, 04:06:07 PM »

So, an illegitimate "special prosecutor" introduces a bald-faced lie to the court:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/trump-says-jack-smith-should-be-arrested-after-documents-revelation-5644083?utm_source=RTNews&src_src=RTNews&utm_campaign=rtbreaking-2024-05-05-2&src_cmp=rtbreaking-2024-05-05-2&utm_medium=email&est=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa%2BcidhsJxcPN%2FrQut3NAH7F5ww0LIzwgbOIBKcVOYUPVwjDotRvn

Wait... OMG! 

Wait...OMG!

You mean Trump is being prosecuted for mishandling classified documents, yet the lead prosecutor's office is allowed to freely mishandle the same documents?

I'm not sure the article you posted would agree.
I'm not sure YOU would agree.  Unless you think putting objects back in teh same box but not the exact same configuration is "mishandling".

I am sure you are not sure.

I am sure submitting a false report of the order of contents of a box to a US District Court judge in a trial concerning the mishandling of documents is mishandling documents.

Is the order relevant to the charges?
No.

Therefore its not relevant and not mishandling.  And if this is Trump legal defence, he really has none.