1

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden

« on: January 16, 2025, 07:33:39 AM »

There is no argument with your non-sequitur point.

The rackets I listed are cons foisted upon the public and committed by criminals within all levels of government.

Now, as I wrote earlier, go sit in the corner and leave the humans in peace.

2

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden

« on: January 16, 2025, 06:38:05 AM »

Choose one of the following:

A - In order to conduct a racket (in the context of a criminal operation), it requires the confidence of all parties affected by its operation.

B - In order to conduct a racket (in the context of a criminal operation), it requires the act of conniving amongst the operators of the racket.

CASE CLOSED!

Now please, just go sit in the corner somewhere and leave the actual humans alone.

3

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden

« on: January 15, 2025, 08:15:32 PM »

Sorry, I am correct, you are wrong.

I won't waste my time with entities such as you anymore.

I choose to grow out of the practice of wasting my time with the ilk who are labeling forum participants as "dipshits," when they have lost an argument.

FE WINS!!!

4

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden

« on: January 15, 2025, 06:10:42 PM »

^no skills with syntax

Very sad.

Or, deliberately lying.

Even more sad.

PS: fuck off.

5

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden

« on: January 15, 2025, 12:18:38 PM »

Q - How do persons running a protection racket evade prosecution and detection from law enforcement?

A - CONniving to do so.

Please try again.

6

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden

« on: January 15, 2025, 03:12:24 AM »

Describe a racket that does not involve some sort of conniving approach.

Then, I will cede the point.

7

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden

« on: January 14, 2025, 04:54:50 PM »

War is certainly a con, human trafficking is certainly a con, and the Burisma deal was certainly a con.

You are free to disagree, but any non-biased reader clearly understands I am correct in my analysis.

Any non-biased reader clearly understands Joe Biden to be a demented old pedo, who thankfully, is close to the end of his criminal career and, hopefully, life.

8

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: January 14, 2025, 01:23:59 PM »

 "a confidential report..."

"My Office had one north star: follow the ...law..."

Jack Smith is a lying a$$hat. He was illegally appointed and there is nothing confidential about the report.
170 odd so pages of pure bullshit.

9

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden

« on: January 14, 2025, 01:16:38 PM »

My point is cons are rackets and the things I listed are certainly "rackets." Therefore, they are cons.

10

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden

« on: January 14, 2025, 01:02:34 PM »

Cons are a "racket."

The war in Ukraine, human trafficking, and the practice of being a NAZI, all constitute the highest type level of rackets.

11

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden

« on: January 14, 2025, 12:24:07 PM »

Ukraine has been (and continues to be) a focal point for human trafficking and bioweaponry research, in addition to a "NAZI" safe space.

Right along with the US, by the way, who provided immediate relocation to the US of many top NAZI's after WWII.

None of these things constitute "cons,", amirite?

12

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden

« on: January 14, 2025, 09:39:30 AM »

Not at all.

I abhor cons like Trump University and others, like the war in Ukraine.

How about you?

You love the con being pulled in Ukraine, don'tcha!?!?

13

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden

« on: January 14, 2025, 06:47:23 AM »

We lost no privilege about complaining about conmen.

I can certainly understand the aversion to truth and the necessity of framing the resistance to such in choosing the word, "endure."

14

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: January 11, 2025, 06:51:08 AM »

Nobody "loves" being convicted, nor do they truly love convicts.

15

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: January 10, 2025, 06:20:33 PM »

As I wrote earlier, that conviction will get overturned on appeal.

16

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: January 10, 2025, 01:37:06 PM »

Do you have any insight as to whether the Virgin Islands or Guam desire to remain a US protectorate or wish to leave?

I am going to take a wild guess and write: "No, you don't."

17

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: January 10, 2025, 09:49:06 AM »

The US certainly has a Day of Independence and Greenland (just like the Virgin Islands and Guam) can join that group in celebrating.

18

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: January 09, 2025, 04:23:45 AM »

I did read the article and as I wrote earlier, it is quite obvious Raskin is totally onboard with a Trump presidency...amirite?

Raskin said Trump was an insurrectionist. The 14th Amendment already covers this. No need for a new bill.

Just an action like Aaron Burr.

Which of course, has already been attempted twice.

19

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: January 08, 2025, 01:18:41 PM »

This is the thing.

Raskin shows he is clearly on the side of Trump.

He claims Trump is absolutely guilty of insurrection, yet will not perform his sworn Constitutional duty in taking the necessary steps to remove him from office.

He is a fucking coward.

Where is Aaron Burr when we need him!?!?

20

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: January 08, 2025, 08:44:36 AM »

I did read the article and it is spook shit.

I did hear Raskin say exactly what he said.

He said that 9 justices did not want to do his job.

So, he was whining about bullshit.

At least he didn't have his gay badge on when he was whining.