1

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: Today at 12:03:23 PM »

If you read the LA Times article, it does not get into the particulars about which you ask.

It simply states the woman entered an area that had been cordoned off by police.

Hence, my question to you.

Would you, like the woman, enter an area cordoned off by police?

If yes, what would you expect to happen?

2

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: Today at 10:39:18 AM »

LD, if an area has been cordoned off by the police, are you going to enter that area?

If so, what do you expect to happen?

3

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: June 04, 2025, 10:39:44 AM »

I think everyone, including Trump, realizes prohibition does not work.

Were you actually hoping for Trump to deny Hoover federal clemency and seek to retry him in hopes for a death penalty sentence?

Larry Hoover had but one drug charge I think.

4

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: May 24, 2025, 06:23:26 AM »

The campaign promises are directly related to the office, amirite? Fails at that, according to you.

You can't keep your story straight.

5

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: May 24, 2025, 03:55:18 AM »

You just wrote about how many failed businesses and burnt bridges the guy has.

Not to mention the many campaign promises he has failed to keep.

Sounds like a guy incapable of delivering to me.

6

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: May 23, 2025, 03:27:39 PM »

RE adherents: "The guy least capable of delivering is the guy likely to deliver the most favors."

7

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Terrible Political Memes

« on: May 23, 2025, 09:11:13 AM »

8

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: May 23, 2025, 08:17:31 AM »

One wonders how one can write of "expectations of big favors," from a "divisive public figure," with a history "burning bridges."

Do you even read what you write?

9

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: May 22, 2025, 08:15:32 AM »

ITT: RE adherents claim the ability to "objectively" evaluate mistakes despite thousands of years of evidence demonstrating the opposite.

For instance, AATW claims: 

He does briefly say it's "sad" but any normal human would have leant more heavily on that than all the other stuff he's rambling on about.

Fact of the matter is, he opens with the words, "very sad," and says it twice during the video, which is just as many times as he mentioned the words, "stage 9."

10

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: May 22, 2025, 05:52:57 AM »

ITT: RE adherents learn that mistakes are committed on a regular basis. RE adherents claim they should not happen.

11

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: May 21, 2025, 03:19:04 PM »

There was a correlation between stage 5 and a Gleason score of 9 as to how severe cancer is, so that little "gotcha moment," is a fucking nothingburger from RE as usual.

There is no stage 5 cancer either.

Ooh...My finger tapped the wrong fucking key on the keyboard!!! Call the goddamn police, ya shitbird!!!

12

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: May 21, 2025, 11:19:18 AM »

^A post from a guy who called Hairy Legs, the pedophile, a "grown up," and participated in trying to justify the utter stupidity that occurred during the term of the worst president in US history, claiming the rest of the world "respected," the US under Hairy Legs, because that is what the "credible media," reported...

In fact, this guy's entire history on this particular sub forum is filled with nothing but "wrong takes" commentary about issues that have been later revealed to be total bullshit, particularly covfefe and Trump.

Just STFU with your bullshit.

13

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: May 21, 2025, 10:39:29 AM »

The only "whoopsie," on this forum is that you are still allowed to post here.

CBS Mornings on Instagram has a commentary concerning Biden, stating,"Look, this is a very serious aggressive cancer. So, he has a gleason stage of nine out of 10 with 10 being in the worst..."

Not to mention again, Trump opened his comments with the words, "very sad...", repeating that again later.

You're just a liar.

Please leave.

14

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: May 21, 2025, 09:05:16 AM »

He mentioned "very sad," just as many times in the clip as he did "stage 9," you liar.

There was a correlation between stage 5 and a Gleason score of 9 as to how severe cancer is, so that little "gotcha moment," is a fucking nothingburger from RE as usual.

Why do you post so much bullshit?

15

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: May 18, 2025, 05:23:40 AM »

It's not like there's a long history of presidents.

FTFY.

16

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: May 17, 2025, 07:10:17 PM »

Also, Obama is well known for having rejected gifts.

https://edition.cnn.com/2015/12/01/politics/barack-obama-michelle-obama-gifts

But Obama, like any other federal employee, is legally barred from accepting any of it outright.

This was in 2015. 

Where in the hell does the article state Obama was "well known," for rejecting gifts?

17

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: May 16, 2025, 08:47:59 PM »

^Shhh...quiet everyone...

markjo is going to tell us all about how he knows what is and isn't "classified," concerning AF1...aka, stuff real close to the "basic physics," or "emoluments," buzzwords that he so dearly loves to toss about as an "insider."

LMMFAO!!!

18

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: May 16, 2025, 06:28:18 PM »

^ Shhhh...quiet everyone...

markjo is going to provide us all with his keen insight as to the necessary safety and security procedures that entail the construction of a "proper," AF1.

I mean, wtf...this tops the "basic physics," bullshit you find emanating from his keyboard.

LMMFAO!!!

19

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: May 12, 2025, 07:05:44 PM »

As I thought, simply labeling something as something.

"SOMETHING IS WRONGITIS!!!"

20

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: May 12, 2025, 05:22:26 PM »

Is the plane a direct gift to the man or the office?

I can only hearken back to the days where Trump was accused of grifting because of some merchandise offered on a website not even affiliated with Trump...yet, the non-investigatory types claimed otherwise.

Fucking jokes, the lot are.