VHF and Microwave Propagation Characteristics of Ducts:
http://www.df5ai.net/ArticlesDL/VK3KAQDucts2007V3.5.pdf
From the abstract:
Abstract— Observations from many years of amateur radio
operations together with commercial microwave propagation
studies and are used to illustrate the nature of the VHF
propagation in ducts. Recently developed formula for
characterizing VHF and microwave propagation in ducts are used
and modified to reconcile the observations with theory.
The theory was wrong so they went back and changed the formulas around to match the observation. This puts you in a bad place, because it suggests that the theories weren't able to predict and had to be changed around to match the observations. This theory is looking weaker and weaker.
And that's how the Scientific approach differs from your Zetetic approach.
Science is all about
a) Devising a theory
b) Making an observation
c) revising the theory
d) repeating the observation, etc.
Your Zetetic approach seems to consist of
a) Making a wild claim
b) Inventing some abstract concept that
could support it
c) Ignoring all scientific evidence that disproves it
d) Calling everyone that disagrees heathens/satanists
e) Demand that everyone provide proof of the science that rejects the original Zetetic idea
f) Rejecting all proofs provided
g) Refusing to provide any proof or said Zetetic idea on the basis that it is not up to you to provide any proof
h) Using circular logic to state that the concept invented in
b) proves that
a) must be true
i) Ignoring all scientific evidence that disproves
b)j) iterate for all eternity...
Did you even bother to read the paper?
...Measurements from a high resolution SODAR are used to show the complex structure and characteristics of elevated ducts...
Their observation proves the existence of elevated ducts.
Next step, revise the theory, then rinse and repeat...