You just made my list, buddy.
this world does not have room for another mind as intelligent as yours.
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.
https://www.npr.org/2019/02/19/696146089/trump-threatens-to-cancel-california-s-929-million-high-speed-rail-grantBoy is Trump being obvious with his wall block rage.Also:https://www.npr.org/2019/02/19/695954246/trump-officials-tried-to-rush-nuclear-technology-to-saudis-house-panel-findsHope the Right rages at him since they hated Hillary for selling uranium to Russia, who has nukes already.
Hillary didn't sell uranium to Russia.https://www.politifact.com/facebook-fact-checks/statements/2018/dec/07/blog-posting/complex-tale-involving-hillary-clinton-uranium-rus/
Quote from: honk on February 20, 2019, 04:56:13 PMHillary didn't sell uranium to Russia.https://www.politifact.com/facebook-fact-checks/statements/2018/dec/07/blog-posting/complex-tale-involving-hillary-clinton-uranium-rus/Blah, blah, blah...Of course there is no bill of receipt signed by Vladimir Putin and HRC...But there is the little matter of contributions to the Clinton Foundation from Russia via Frank Giustra.Not to mention 500k paid to Slick Willy for a speech...LOL! Who the hell pays 500k for a speech?Let's see what Huber finds out...
Quote from: totallackey on February 20, 2019, 05:09:47 PMQuote from: honk on February 20, 2019, 04:56:13 PMHillary didn't sell uranium to Russia.https://www.politifact.com/facebook-fact-checks/statements/2018/dec/07/blog-posting/complex-tale-involving-hillary-clinton-uranium-rus/Blah, blah, blah...Of course there is no bill of receipt signed by Vladimir Putin and HRC...But there is the little matter of contributions to the Clinton Foundation from Russia via Frank Giustra.Not to mention 500k paid to Slick Willy for a speech...LOL! Who the hell pays 500k for a speech?Let's see what Huber finds out...Lots of people pay a lot of money for presidential speeches. George W Bush gets about 175k per speech and no one really liked him by the time he left office.Do you care that Trump before the election could only criticize the Clinton foundation taking money from Saudi's because of how corrupt the Saudi's are, but now is trying to get them nuclear materials?
Lots of people pay a lot of money for presidential speeches. George W Bush gets about 175k per speech and no one really liked him by the time he left office.Do you care that Trump before the election could only criticize the Clinton foundation taking money from Saudi's because of how corrupt the Saudi's are, but now is trying to get them nuclear materials?
What is wrong with HRC getting criticized by anyone?
Quote from: totallackey on February 20, 2019, 05:34:44 PMLots of people pay a lot of money for presidential speeches. George W Bush gets about 175k per speech and no one really liked him by the time he left office.Do you care that Trump before the election could only criticize the Clinton foundation taking money from Saudi's because of how corrupt the Saudi's are, but now is trying to get them nuclear materials?Nuclear materials?There is no attempt to get the Saudis nuclear materials.
When Hillary deals with the Saudi's, the Saudis are corrupt and bad. When Trump deals with the Saudis they are one of our closest allies. That hypocrisy.
Quote from: Rama Set on February 21, 2019, 01:37:04 PMWhen Hillary deals with the Saudi's, the Saudis are corrupt and bad. When Trump deals with the Saudis they are one of our closest allies. That hypocrisy.I would submit it depends on the types of dealings.Suggesting nuclear technology should be shared is the initial part of the deal. Nothing taken in return yet for one.25 million USD? That was definitely taken...
Quote from: totallackey on February 21, 2019, 04:49:05 PMQuote from: Rama Set on February 21, 2019, 01:37:04 PMWhen Hillary deals with the Saudi's, the Saudis are corrupt and bad. When Trump deals with the Saudis they are one of our closest allies. That hypocrisy.I would submit it depends on the types of dealings.Suggesting nuclear technology should be shared is the initial part of the deal. Nothing taken in return yet for one.25 million USD? That was definitely taken...Thats a reasonable way to approach it, but that has nothing to do with Trump's stance. He was condemning Hillary for dealing with the Saudi's at all. It did not matter to him what was taken or not. But now that it is him, it appears to be a non-issue.
But there is the little matter of contributions to the Clinton Foundation from Russia via Frank Giustra.
Quote from: totallackey on February 20, 2019, 05:09:47 PMBut there is the little matter of contributions to the Clinton Foundation from Russia via Frank Giustra.How do you know the contributions were "from Russia via Frank Giustra"? Is there any evidence of a connection between Giustra and Russia, something that would make it reasonable to suppose that the money supposedly coming from Giustra was really coming from Russia?
Quote from: honk on February 22, 2019, 05:25:56 AMQuote from: totallackey on February 20, 2019, 05:09:47 PMBut there is the little matter of contributions to the Clinton Foundation from Russia via Frank Giustra.How do you know the contributions were "from Russia via Frank Giustra"? Is there any evidence of a connection between Giustra and Russia, something that would make it reasonable to suppose that the money supposedly coming from Giustra was really coming from Russia?https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html"As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock."