Quote from: Andrew on August 04, 2014, 07:51:33 AMSoftware can fix latency. It can't, however, fix the fact that you have a ghetto ass connection and can't receive high resolution content from the server fast enough.Wouldn't the only software fix be more efficient packet management by the switches? And wouldn't that result in negligable gains?
Software can fix latency. It can't, however, fix the fact that you have a ghetto ass connection and can't receive high resolution content from the server fast enough.
Quote from: Lord Dave on August 06, 2014, 05:30:44 PMQuote from: Andrew on August 04, 2014, 07:51:33 AMSoftware can fix latency. It can't, however, fix the fact that you have a ghetto ass connection and can't receive high resolution content from the server fast enough.Wouldn't the only software fix be more efficient packet management by the switches? And wouldn't that result in negligable gains?No. If your latency is above 200ms for example, you wouldn't be able to join the server.
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.
Quote from: Andrew on August 09, 2014, 10:18:31 AMQuote from: Lord Dave on August 06, 2014, 05:30:44 PMQuote from: Andrew on August 04, 2014, 07:51:33 AMSoftware can fix latency. It can't, however, fix the fact that you have a ghetto ass connection and can't receive high resolution content from the server fast enough.Wouldn't the only software fix be more efficient packet management by the switches? And wouldn't that result in negligable gains?No. If your latency is above 200ms for example, you wouldn't be able to join the server.How is that fixing latency? You're just banning people with high latency.
I'm glad you learned that your original statement is false.
It isn't false.
Quote from: Andrew on August 09, 2014, 06:45:12 PMIt isn't false.Whatever keeps the music box in your head wound up appears to be slacking.
If we are not speculating then we must assume
It's not strictly false. Killing all poor people would solve poverty, at least for a short period of time. It's retarded, but not false.