[honk]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11058449/Trump-tees-son-Eric-pros-Bryson-DeChambeau-Dustin-Johnson-LIV-series.html

[Action80]

They are investigating the matter. That’s all that I have claimed.

No, you claimed Trump submits electors.

Not some boot-lickers that Trump decides to submit...

Direct quote.

Trump doesn't submit electors.

No president does.

This is the substance of the allegation. That Trump and his cronies conspired to submit a fake slate of electors to congress with the express purpose of obstructing the certification of the electoral votes. You have finally caught up.

So now, not only are you repeating fake news (news with no substance) you are making fake claims about the entire process.

Incorrect. The DOJ is indeed investigating the matter. That is substantially true and that is what the news reported. It isn’t fake and I haven’t misrepresented that. But keep on being a Trump lackey.

When you describe something illegal, let us know for sure, okay?

Because right now, you are just all over the place with the crapola (with a capital C).

[Lord Dave]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11058449/Trump-tees-son-Eric-pros-Bryson-DeChambeau-Dustin-Johnson-LIV-series.html

Meh.  Who cares?  He can invite whoever he wants to his golf course.  That's his business.

[AATW]

For those not in the UK, the Daily Mail is an awful rag whose sole purpose seems to be to make sure it’s readership are permanently furious about things

[markjo]

When you describe something illegal, let us know for sure, okay?

Do you mean like illegally using the presidential seal for commercial purposes?

Federal law prohibits knowingly using the printed or other likeness of the presidential seal “for the purpose of conveying, or in a manner reasonably calculated to convey, a false impression of sponsorship or approval by the Government of the United States.”

Violations of the law can result in fines, imprisonment up to six months or both.

[Action80]

When you describe something illegal, let us know for sure, okay?

Do you mean like illegally using the presidential seal for commercial purposes?

Federal law prohibits knowingly using the printed or other likeness of the presidential seal “for the purpose of conveying, or in a manner reasonably calculated to convey, a false impression of sponsorship or approval by the Government of the United States.”

Violations of the law can result in fines, imprisonment up to six months or both.

Gee, you better contact the DOJ and have them get right on this whopper of a case.

[markjo]

When you describe something illegal, let us know for sure, okay?

Do you mean like illegally using the presidential seal for commercial purposes?

Federal law prohibits knowingly using the printed or other likeness of the presidential seal “for the purpose of conveying, or in a manner reasonably calculated to convey, a false impression of sponsorship or approval by the Government of the United States.”

Violations of the law can result in fines, imprisonment up to six months or both.

Gee, you better contact the DOJ and have them get right on this whopper of a case.

Someone already did.
https://www.citizensforethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/2021-7-16-Presidential-seal.pdf

[Rama Set]

When you describe something illegal, let us know for sure, okay?

Do you mean like illegally using the presidential seal for commercial purposes?

Federal law prohibits knowingly using the printed or other likeness of the presidential seal “for the purpose of conveying, or in a manner reasonably calculated to convey, a false impression of sponsorship or approval by the Government of the United States.”

Violations of the law can result in fines, imprisonment up to six months or both.

Gee, you better contact the DOJ and have them get right on this whopper of a case.

Weird way of admitting you were wrong.

[honk]

For those not in the UK, the Daily Mail is an awful rag whose sole purpose seems to be to make sure it’s readership are permanently furious about things

Yes, it is. But just look at that picture I posted! It's amazing! Why is his shirt apparently two sizes too big for him? Did Trump just not buy any new clothes at all after he lost weight?

[Lord Dave]

He looks so old in that photo.  And not orange.  Like he stopped carring or something.

[Action80]

When you describe something illegal, let us know for sure, okay?

Do you mean like illegally using the presidential seal for commercial purposes?

Federal law prohibits knowingly using the printed or other likeness of the presidential seal “for the purpose of conveying, or in a manner reasonably calculated to convey, a false impression of sponsorship or approval by the Government of the United States.”

Violations of the law can result in fines, imprisonment up to six months or both.

Gee, you better contact the DOJ and have them get right on this whopper of a case.

Weird way of admitting you were wrong.

Wrong about what?

[Action80]

When you describe something illegal, let us know for sure, okay?

Do you mean like illegally using the presidential seal for commercial purposes?

Federal law prohibits knowingly using the printed or other likeness of the presidential seal “for the purpose of conveying, or in a manner reasonably calculated to convey, a false impression of sponsorship or approval by the Government of the United States.”

Violations of the law can result in fines, imprisonment up to six months or both.

Gee, you better contact the DOJ and have them get right on this whopper of a case.

Someone already did.
https://www.citizensforethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/2021-7-16-Presidential-seal.pdf

Fantastic!

What has been the result of this blockbuster case!?!?!

[markjo]

What has been the result of this blockbuster case!?!?!

I never said that it's a "blockbuster case".  But it is another example of Trump's character and flagrant disregard for the law.  Then again, there are so many other investigations on against Trump that it's understandable that you might not care about this one. 

[Action80]

What has been the result of this blockbuster case!?!?!

I never said that it's a "blockbuster case".  But it is another example of Trump's character and flagrant disregard for the law.  Then again, there are so many other investigations on against Trump that it's understandable that you might not care about this one.

Well, it seems that a disregard for the law isn't even established in this case, as that has not yet been determined.

Yes, there is a lot of news about all of these "investigations."

Lots of "three card monte," journalism taking place nowadays.

[Rama Set]

What has been the result of this blockbuster case!?!?!

I never said that it's a "blockbuster case".  But it is another example of Trump's character and flagrant disregard for the law.  Then again, there are so many other investigations on against Trump that it's understandable that you might not care about this one.

Well, it seems that a disregard for the law isn't even established in this case, as that has not yet been determined.

Yes, there is a lot of news about all of these "investigations."

Lots of "three card monte," journalism taking place nowadays.

Reporting that a criminal complaint exists is not scamming anyone. You really struggle with factual content vs what your easily outraged persona believes.

[Action80]

Reporting that a criminal complaint exists is not scamming anyone. You really struggle with factual content vs what your easily outraged persona believes.

But it is another example of Trump's character and flagrant disregard for the law. 

^The effects of three-card monte journalism are demonstrated right here, as no criminality has been determined.

You were saying?

[markjo]

Reporting that a criminal complaint exists is not scamming anyone. You really struggle with factual content vs what your easily outraged persona believes.

But it is another example of Trump's character and flagrant disregard for the law. 

^The effects of three-card monte journalism are demonstrated right here, as no criminality has been determined.

You were saying?

Are you saying that it's perfectly legal for Trump to continue using the presidential seal at his golf course even when federal law says that it isn't?

[Action80]

Reporting that a criminal complaint exists is not scamming anyone. You really struggle with factual content vs what your easily outraged persona believes.

But it is another example of Trump's character and flagrant disregard for the law. 

^The effects of three-card monte journalism are demonstrated right here, as no criminality has been determined.

You were saying?

Are you saying that it's perfectly legal for Trump to continue using the presidential seal at his golf course even when federal law says that it isn't?

I wrote exactly what I wrote, as did you.

You labeled Trump a criminal in this case when that hasn't yet been established.

[markjo]

Are you saying that it's perfectly legal for Trump to continue using the presidential seal at his golf course even when federal law says that it isn't?

I wrote exactly what I wrote, as did you.

But you didn't answer my question.

[Rama Set]

Reporting that a criminal complaint exists is not scamming anyone. You really struggle with factual content vs what your easily outraged persona believes.

But it is another example of Trump's character and flagrant disregard for the law. 

^The effects of three-card monte journalism are demonstrated right here, as no criminality has been determined.

You were saying?

Would you like to ask a clarifying question or just put together two quotes as if that constitutes an arguement and not a shit post?