Trying to follow Lackey (Action)'s train of thought is so difficult.
He seems to be in the line of "What is good for me, is good for everyone". Now while I'm sure he thinks his neighbor having a nuke is safer than the US government, I'm gonna feel that its not as safe. So why does Action's safety trump my own? Why is it that the right to Life, Liberty, and the Persuit of Happiness extend to him, but not to me? Why is it that HIS rights can't be infringed upon, but mine? Sure. Seems rather hypocritical. His guns make me less safe.
If he wants to defend himself: Ban all guns and give everyone a shortsword. See? Problem solved. Also note: weapons are man made. FYI. So is religion. So is the press. So is prison. Hell, so is law.
Also: The Constitution and law was heavily influenced by John Locke and the British Government, not so much Jeudo-Christian teachings. Like Jeudo-Christians would NEVER have put freedom of religion in there. It's "God or Death" for the True Christian nations.
Also:
Amendment 7 probably needs some updating. $20 was a lot back then. Not so much now.