The conviction will get overturned on appeal.
If we are not speculating then we must assume
As far as I understand, that's a common line of defence for some of the more colourful opinion sources in America. Alex Jones tried something similar during a custody battle with his ex-wifehttps://www.independent.co.uk/news/infowars-alex-jones-performance-artist-playing-character-lawyer-conspiracy-theory-donald-trump-a7687571.html
Quote from: Pete Svarrior on September 30, 2020, 12:56:40 PMAs far as I understand, that's a common line of defence for some of the more colourful opinion sources in America. Alex Jones tried something similar during a custody battle with his ex-wifehttps://www.independent.co.uk/news/infowars-alex-jones-performance-artist-playing-character-lawyer-conspiracy-theory-donald-trump-a7687571.htmlThe problem is an ethical one in that, unlike the Daily Show or something similar, someone like Tucker Carlson presents himself as a serious journalist. There aren’t disclaimers or obvious contextual clues to indicate that he shouldn’t be trusted.
Do you have a citation for this sweeping generalisation?
The crux of the problem is people confuse commentary and entertainment with news. MSNBC, CNN, FOX... pure commentary and entertainment and no news.
Quote from: Rama Set on September 30, 2020, 04:55:00 PMQuote from: Pete Svarrior on September 30, 2020, 12:56:40 PMAs far as I understand, that's a common line of defence for some of the more colourful opinion sources in America. Alex Jones tried something similar during a custody battle with his ex-wifehttps://www.independent.co.uk/news/infowars-alex-jones-performance-artist-playing-character-lawyer-conspiracy-theory-donald-trump-a7687571.htmlThe problem is an ethical one in that, unlike the Daily Show or something similar, someone like Tucker Carlson presents himself as a serious journalist. There aren’t disclaimers or obvious contextual clues to indicate that he shouldn’t be trusted.I trust The Daily Show over Fox anyday.