Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Action80

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 99  Next >
1
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: US Election poll
« on: Today at 03:45:09 PM »
Seems we need to barricade the doors to stop the members from overflowing this quality thread.

2
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: Today at 03:43:21 PM »
I think Action80 is voting for the pedophile.  :(
I would never even consider voting for someone who is a pedophile.

Thank god you are not running.

3
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: Today at 12:21:53 PM »
I, of course, can't tell you because her ruling has no legal basis.  Lots of words and quotes, but no basis.
Here you go, you troll.

"The Superseding Indictment is DISMISSED because Special Counsel Smith's appointment violates the Appointments Clause of the United States Constitution."

Now, just stfu with all of the bs you love so much.

4
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: Today at 10:42:14 AM »
Anyway, Rushy's fun pedantry aside, assuming it will be Harris like literally everyone is saying it will be, are you gonna vote for the senile old pedophile?
I am wondering who the senile old pedophile could be?

Care to enlighten?

I mean, you are hanging your hat on a for-shit rack still?

Of course there was always only one candidate who took frequent trips on Jeffrey Epstein's Lolita Express and has multiple documented cases of millions in hush money being paid to the parents of underage kids.
Just pony up with all the trips, when they took place, and all the parents, or just stfu with your bullshit...

K?

5
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 23, 2024, 06:28:23 PM »
Anyway, Rushy's fun pedantry aside, assuming it will be Harris like literally everyone is saying it will be, are you gonna vote for the senile old pedophile?
I am wondering who the senile old pedophile could be?

Care to enlighten?

I mean, you are hanging your hat on a for-shit rack still?

6
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 23, 2024, 04:59:08 PM »
c'MON, MAN!!! Give the poor ole sot break...I mean, look at his stellar record at analysis of nearly every topic discussed here at the forum.

7
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 23, 2024, 09:50:57 AM »
And what is the legal basis of her ruling and why was the trial allowed to even start?
I thought you claimed you read the ruling?

Got to have fodder for the evening news.

8
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden
« on: July 23, 2024, 09:49:13 AM »
His "public policies" resulted in nothing but total disaster for millions of citizens of this country.

Jesus. Gotta be fucking kidding.

9
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 22, 2024, 10:37:50 AM »
With no legal standing.  And ignoring precident from the last 100+ years.

But sure, she's in charge and if she wants to help Trump, that's her business, right?
With plenty of legal standing and change has always been your baby (as in the diapers on Joe).

I cannot help it if a bot is incapable of understanding issues of appropriations and the like.

Hawk tuah...

10
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 22, 2024, 09:33:57 AM »

Oh hey, found the authority.
28USC 533.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/533#:~:text=28%20U.S.%20Code%20%C2%A7%20533%20%2D%20Investigative%20and%20other%20officials%3B%20appointment,-U.S.%20Code&text=to%20conduct%20such%20other%20investigations,directed%20by%20the%20Attorney%20General.

You know, in case you weren't trolling.
Oh hey, let's forget the confirmation process all together, right?

Hawk tuah...
Which does not apply since congress already made that unnecessary for special prosecutors.  So try again.
I do not need to try that again, since the persons running the show declared it does apply.

Hawk tuah...

12
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden
« on: July 22, 2024, 08:27:49 AM »
None of this is going to end well for anyone.

Get ready for Phase 3.

13
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden
« on: July 17, 2024, 01:46:22 PM »
If you hire by ability and not ideology...

LMFAO!
Well, that explains why you're unemployed.
LMMFAO!!!

Bot supports candidates and party promoting DEI (the epitome of hiring based on nothing but ideology), then bot claims a real human is unemployed.

14
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden
« on: July 17, 2024, 10:36:58 AM »
If you hire by ability and not ideology...

LMFAO!

15
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden
« on: July 16, 2024, 07:57:58 PM »
Yeah, any text containing the words christian and values would more than likely be a problem with you, regardless of actual context.

16
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 16, 2024, 07:55:08 PM »
So, everyone crying about the ability of a president to pardon his/her/them/they/it selves just need to STFU and go away.

Saddam to the rescue again!

[/sarcasm]

17
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 16, 2024, 11:27:37 AM »
Why would he need to pardon himself if he can just order the DoJ to drop charges?

But he's correct: it's unknown if they can.  Never been done before.  And as we know... Trump can do no wrong.  His impeachment would never go through.  Not unless democrats controlled both houses.  Nor would he lose support.  Why would he?  None of his supporters care if he's guilty of some made up, witch-hunt crime.  Hell, they don't even care that he pushed to make the covid vaccine that's part of the plan to wipe out humanity.  Never even mention it.  Because they are loyal.  Blind loyalty.  They'd kill for him.  Wouldn't you?
You can ask the other bot as to why he believes Trump would choose to pardon himself.

The charges are bogus to begin with, they never would have been brought against him had he not decided to run again for president.

Whether you like it or not, presidents cannot pardon themselves for the exact reason I wrote before.

An application for pardon needs to be made. An application for pardon is essentially an admission of criminal guilt. Once an admission of guilt exists, that proves a criminal act was committed. Criminal acts are impeachable offenses.

All the numbnuts will continue the handwringing and lamentations of "OMB" until the next big thing comes around.

So far, I have yet to read about any Trump supporters going around killing people.

Typical bullshit.

Try harder, please.

18
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 16, 2024, 11:06:59 AM »
https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-classified-documents-case-dismissed-07-15-24/index.html

Trump wins.  His Judge has basically said all special appointments are unconstitutional and thus the case is dismissed, which breaks from every other judge whose had this. Also, she did this after over a year!  Why didn't she dismiss it sooner?  Because she's corrupt.


Mark my words: if Trump wins, he'll appointment her to SCOTUS.
Jack Smith had no standing, AT ALL.

Ok, so what was the correct, proper, standing person or group that should have been used?  The DoJ?  The President?  Mitch McConnel?
The correct proper way to appoint special counsel is for Congress to approve the appointment.

That is why Mueller never went anywhere and why Smith was going nowhere.

Truman Show shit.
But that wasn't the ruling. The ruling was that all special counsels were unconstitutional.  All of them.
" ...is there a statute in the United States Code that authorizes the appointment of Special Counsel Smith to conduct this prosecution? After careful study of this seminal issue, the answer is no."

"If the political branches wish to grant the Attorney General power to appoint Special Counsel Smith to investigate and prosecute this action with the full powers of a United States Attorney, there is a valid means by which to do so. He can be appointed and confirmed through the default method prescribed in the Appointments Clause, as Congress has directed for United States Attorneys throughout
American history, see 28 U.S.C. ยง 541, or Congress can authorize his appointment through enactment of positive statutory law consistent with the Appointments Clause."

Maybe you can find something in the ruling that mentions ALL special counsels.

19
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 16, 2024, 06:31:40 AM »
https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-classified-documents-case-dismissed-07-15-24/index.html

Trump wins.  His Judge has basically said all special appointments are unconstitutional and thus the case is dismissed, which breaks from every other judge whose had this. Also, she did this after over a year!  Why didn't she dismiss it sooner?  Because she's corrupt.


Mark my words: if Trump wins, he'll appointment her to SCOTUS.
Jack Smith had no standing, AT ALL.

Ok, so what was the correct, proper, standing person or group that should have been used?  The DoJ?  The President?  Mitch McConnel?
The correct proper way to appoint special counsel is for Congress to approve the appointment.

That is why Mueller never went anywhere and why Smith was going nowhere.

Truman Show shit.

20
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 16, 2024, 06:29:09 AM »
If you don't think such would continue 100 fold if Trump becomes POTUS again then you have not been paying attention.
LOL!!!

Yeah, it is the TDS.

The only nonsense that would continue is the asshatted whining comments about the sky falling because OMB.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 99  Next >