I could answer all of the questions regarding the Sun. That the Black Sun supplies the subquarks necessary for the Sun's output of quarks, the composition of the Sun and of the Moon. But you are not going to believe it.
That is why first it is imperative that you understand the following facts.
The solar eclipse of March 20, 1662 AD:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1851060#msg1851060Believe it or not, there are no astronomical/historical records for this total solar eclipse (other than a brief mention by Cassini), by far what should have been the most important astronomical event of the millenium, a chance to settle once and for all the Gregorian calendar reform controversy.
The Jesuits in India/China, F. Verbiest, J. Schall von Bell, even the young N. Flamsteed fail to notice/record this most important of all the total solar eclipses.
We are told that G.D. Cassini published new tables of the sun, based on his observations at San Petronio in 1662: these observations are published in the Catalogue général des livres imprimés de la Bibliothèque Nationale, XXIV (Paris, 1905), cols. 678–682, or in the Table générale des maturès continuesdans l’Histoire et dans les Mémoires de l’Académic Royaledes Sciences, I–III (Paris, 1729–1734).
Here is Cassini's most celebrated work:
http://amshistorica.unibo.it/25 (italian/latin) (pg 28-30)
However, when the mathematicians of today examined the scientific/astronomical basis on which pontiff Gregory XIII based his decision to modify the Julian calendar, they discovered extraordinary errors: there was no way that anybody at that time could/would have modified the calendar by 10 days.
The high-voltage differential is measured between the B-2's positive leading edge and its negative ion exhaust stream.
The four engines of the B-2 bomber put out a thrust of 140,000 HP (25 MW, assuming a 30% conversion of efficiency).
A 35-ft electrogravitic disc would need to have access to 50MW.
The B-2 has 72 metric tons, when empty. This works out to 32 grams/sq.cm when fully loaded.
T.T. Brown's 18 inch diameter disk was generating an upward thrust of 125 grams when energized at 170 Kv.
That is 0.08 grams/sq.cm.
So, to generate a force capable of lifting the B-2, a thrust per unit area four hundred times greater would be needed. This is accomplished by using a high-K dielectric.
This is would provide 100 times more thrust at 1000 Kv. If the Pyrex insulator is replaced with barium titanate, there would be an additional 32-fold of thrust.
That is, instead of the 125 grams of force, Brown's thruster would have provided 400 kg of force. If we now distribute 380 of these capacitors over the wing surface they would provide an upward thrust of 152 tons.
It is not my claim that the Sun is not spherical: it is pure science.
https://forum.tfes.org/index.php?topic=14947.msg194515#msg194515Since the pressure in the chromosphere is 10^-13 BAR = 0.0000000000001 BAR, the Sun becomes a huge gas centrifuge with no outer casing.
The shape of the Sun could not possibly be spherical.
The reason it appears circular when viewed from distance is the existence of a different index of refraction of ether for each latitude.
The ether is latitude dependent.
http://www.orgonelab.org/miller.htm"The measurements were latitude-dependent as well."
http://www.orgonelab.org/EtherDrift/Galaev.pdfOn page 218, a formula for the latitude dependent ether drift.
The CORIOLIS EFFECT formula used by Michelson and Gale is also latitude dependent (ether drift formula).
The existence of the ether shows that there are latitude dependent indexes of refraction.
This changes everything.