Interesting how you chose to leave any and all meritorious detail out of your post. Let's recap:
First, you wanted us to take action against Thork for the views he espoused. I explained to you that we don't restrict people based on *what* they say. In the upper, virtually all debate is allowed so long as it's done in a civil manner. So yes, Thork can say he thinks feminism is a satanic cult or whatever, because Thork knows how to behave himself.
Then, a number of reports were made against you because you decided to start making posts consisting of little else but childish insults, and by lacing your other posts with hilarious "lol I spelled your name wrong, REKT XD" jokes. I made a personal judgement that you're a sensible enough person that simply asking you politely to stop would be better than the usual approach of immediately warning you and threatening you with a ban.
At that point, you somehow decided that you should report posts containing the word "foolish" from now on. The flaw in your reasoning was that the word is in no way restricted - it's how you use it*.
Finally, and I think that's the most important part, you chose to report junker's post for containing this "magic word". I clarified to you that while I don't agree with what junker has said, he has not broken any rules. This is what you chose to deliberately misrepresent here as "junker not having been right, but you still being wrong".
What you fundamentally fail to understand is the separation between the execution of rules and my personal opinions. You seem to demand that I factor in my personal agreement with someone into whether or not I should take action against them. To be clear, this is not going to happen.
I really don't appreciate you lying here. I can now see that I was mistaken in thinking that I can talk you into following the rules. I'll revert to the default behaviour.
* - this, by the way, is what you still fail to understand. You *can* come here and tell us we're biased. In oft-repeated terms, I disagree with you, but it's not against the rules by default. What *is* against the rules is you rambling about junker's PMS (leave her alone you misogynist!
) and self-righteous rants about how you already know the answer to your own question (usually along the lines of "my opponents are stupid and/or evil"). Work on your form, you'll be much happier for it. Not just here, but in life as a whole.