I noticed your chart was only for western countries.
Yes, that was intentionally done, because that's where scientific advancements have had the most impact.
Psalm 90 in the Bible said that men lived 70 to 80 yrs which is what actuaries say people live to these days.
That verse doesn't necessarily mean that 70-80 year lives were
typical, only that they were
possible. If you made it past childhood mortality, famine, disease, giving birth to your own children, etc.
Technology and science are not the same thing.
You may recall that I didn't say they
were the same; I said that it is a "physical manifestation of what 'science' has made possible". Would you not agree that the two are linked to each other? We couldn't have radio broadcast technology had not Marconi and Hertz (or someone else) done the science first; you would not have a battery in any of the dozens of devices in your home had not Volta and Daniell (or someone else) done the science first; no medical and dental X ray had not Curie and Roentgen (or someone else) done their science first, etc.
Rene Descartes...Science and calculus was invented by Christian scholars (it used to be the only people who could read, write and do math were officers of the church or members of religious orders.
Meanwhile, in the Arab world, all manner of math and science was being discovered as early as the end of the 1st century, hundreds of years before Descartes.
The printing press was invented by a Christian scholar.)
Who do you have in mind here? Gutenberg is commonly credited as the inventor of the printing press, and he was a goldsmith by trade, not a scholar.
you should be ashamed of yourself for resorting to such cheap shots. You just want to be hurtful. Do you have any aptitude for remorse?
I wasn't trying to be hurtful, just pointing out that religious beliefs one way or the other seems to be quite beside the point here. The vast majority of believers I have ever known, have had
zero religious objection to a round earth. But you're right about remorse, and I'll be trying to stay on point from now on.
I base my statement that science has reached a point of diminishing returns due to the fact that a lot of things that science seemed to promise when I was growing up in the 60's: space travel, people traveling by rocket pack, cure for cancer, artificial intelligence, lunar bases and many more things just haven't happened. But we have more clever gadgets. Bully for science!
Well, to be fair, those promises were more from the science FICTION realm, not from science.