How would disproving some, likely selected, claims that someone found on the internet, or coming up with a "plausable" explanation for something, do anything to prove that NASA went to the moon? A show about coming up with some explanations for a few internet claims?
If I can explain something, it's proven? Is that how things work?
Let's start with the admission that no-one can prove we went to the moon in the same sense that no-one can prove the earth is round.
While we're here, you can't really prove anything outside of maths theorems. Any evidence presented for anything else can be dismissed as fake or lies or whatever.
So we have to assess the reliability of evidence and use balance of probabilities to decide what to believe about everything else.
But a lot of the moon hoax "evidence" presented online is of the form "we never went to the moon, you can tell it's fake because ..."
If you can show that the "..." is wrong then no, it doesn't prove we went to the moan but it does show that particular objection is spurious. It maybe helps make an informed decision about what to believe as it changes the perceived quality of evidence and the balance of probabilities.