1

Flat Earth Theory / Is Earth rotating faster?

« on: March 11, 2025, 09:21:48 AM »

This clip was filmed yesterday in England:

https://www.tiktok.com/@j4y_k4y_74/video/7479898573694389526

From the comments:

Romoni – Intuitive Heart: Yes, I confirm from London – it was really fast today. And visible at 12 o'clock!

OnSeagullwings: I didn't look at the moon, but I was staring at Orion the other day. It was flying   straight and steady over the horizon, from south to north, for an hour like an airplane. Strange. Maybe the Earth's rotation speed was disrupted?

Mel: This isn't the first time I've encountered this. I first noticed it back in 2015.

Ricardo Vincent: I didn't look at the speed, but yesterday in the UK the moon was visible all day. What's that like?

dugstar39: The last 5 days in Manchester the sun and moon have been visible all day. It's quite strange, but as a resident of the Commonwealth of Nations I wonder what they see in Australia at this time of year. Have we left them without a moon?


Here is an observation made by a RE scientist in New Mexico (where he lives):

"Local residents informed me that the position of the Sun had recently moved - strangely and dramatically - westward. By my rough estimate, the Sun’s position about an hour after dawn (aka the Earth’s tilt) had been displaced by nearly 30 degrees (along the 360 degrees Earth spin). That measure is quite easily taken although wearing safety sunglasses is recommended. Stretch both arms, hands side by side, on the left side of the Sun, and then move your right hand to the other side of the left. That’s roughly 36 degrees to the east, where the Sun used to be. However, that simple measure no longer applies, due to a very strange shift of the Sun’s trajectory over this past month.

However, over the past week prior to this deadline, the Sun suddenly returned - flipped back - to its former position! That indicates a major down-shift of the Sun and its wobble along the pole (and any related electromagnetic forces along the Earth’s central core) back to its original position. Whether that is a welcome revival of the Sun’s original axis of spin or merely a temporary jog, a momentary repositioning of the Earth’s core, has yet to be determined.

I witness this rather disturbing shift of Earth orbit every day, while walking the dog or driving in southern New Mexico. The sunrise and the Moon’s orbital path are both off-center from their previous trajectories. If you hold up your raised hands to the sky, the morning Sun has shifted westward by three hand-widths or approximately 30 degrees (in an Earth circle of 360 degrees)."

2

Flat Earth Theory / Is Mars rotating faster?

« on: January 30, 2025, 05:37:06 PM »

The footage included was shot over 3 hours using an 11-inch Celestron NexStar GPS telescope and a Blackmagic Pocket Cinema camera.

In those three hours, Mars has rotated by almost 90 degrees. If Mars rotates a quarter of a circle in 3 hours, then it makes a full rotation in 12 hours. However, the official full rotation time is ~24 hours and 30 minutes.

On GLP there is a discussion on this topic, but they are not aware of the discrepancy of the rotation time in the video.

Either the author of the video filmed for six hours (the video is for visual effects, and has little to do with astrophysics) or something else is going on.

3

Flat Earth Theory / FE radius (UAFE estimate)

« on: August 11, 2023, 07:04:34 PM »

https://wiki.tfes.org/Eratosthenes_on_Diameter

Therefore we can take the distance of 500 miles, multiply by 25, and find that the radius of the flat earth is about 12,250 miles. Doubling that figure for the diameter we get a figure of 25,000 miles.


12,250 mi = 19,600 km

This can't be right, not even close.

The lower bound would be R = 6,363.63 km, the upper bound (the RE distance from the equator to the NP) is 10,000 km.

More details here:

http://www.ilya.it/chrono/pages/erdmessungen.htm

4

Arts & Entertainment / Futbol: Brasil, Ginga, Seleção

« on: June 04, 2016, 07:16:33 PM »

Brazil's performance on the soccer field for the past 30 years has been a shadow of its former glory.


According to Zico, this slip is down to players losing their love for the sport by going to play in other countries.

“The majority of the players in the Seleção leave Brazilian soccer quickly and so lose the true identity of our game. They go to play in other countries with different cultures and they lose the happiness and passion of playing in the Brazilian way,” he said.


http://www.howlermagazine.com/brazils-finest-who-fade-away/

http://www.cantpasscantplay.com/201578the-decline-of-brazilian-street-soccer/

http://fusion.net/story/92664/brazilians-in-europe/


Let us remember that Pele received a remuneration of $500 per game early in his career; in order to understand the effects of being paid millions of dollars/euros per season for these soccer superstars and its consequences on their lives, please read The Seven Laws of Money (a classic work): http://seeingmoney.org/SevenLaws.htm


For those who think that Ronaldo, or Ronaldinho, or Rivaldo, or Messi are some of the top players of all time, they have simply never seen Tostao, Rivellino, Zico, Garrincha or Di Stefano in action.

The first soccer great to score 1000 goals was not Pele but Ferenc Puskas.

Those who are of the opinion that Roberto Carlos was the best Brazilian long distance shooter obviously have never seen Eder in action.


Why did Brazil win the World Cup in 1970? That's right, because they had Tostao on the field.



A terrible accident which occurred in 1969 prevented Tostao from playing after 1972, a huge loss for Brazil, as his presence on the field would have made the difference in the semifinal match against Holland in 1974.


Was Rivellino as good as Maradona? You be the judge.






Zico, the most talented Brazilian player of the last 40 years






Eder (the average speed of his long range kicks was 130-140 km/hr, it is recorded that once it even reached 170 km/hr)





Brasil 1982, pure ginga




Brasil never lost with Pele and Garrincha on the field at the same time. Why?






Alfredo Di Stefano




Ferenc Puskas, best tribute

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.ro/2011/10/puskas-soccer-legend-capt-ajit.html

George Best had this to say:  I was with (Bobby) Charlton, (Denis) Law and Puskás, we were coaching in a football academy in Australia. The youngsters we were coaching did not respect him including making fun of his weight and age...We decided to let the guys challenge a coach to hit the crossbar 10 times in a row, obviously they picked the old fat one. Law asked the kids how many they thought the old fat coach would get out of ten.  Most said less than five.  George Best said ten.  The old fat coach stepped up and hit nine in a row.  For the tenth shot he scooped the ball in the air, bounced it off both shoulders and his head, then flicked it over with his heel and cannoned the ball off the crossbar on the volley.  They all stood in awed silence then one kid asked who he was, I replied, "To you, his name is Mr. Puskás".


George Best, perhaps the finest European player ever (better than Cruyff or Hagi), who did have the ginga





Pele believed that George Best was the greatest ever to have graced a football pitch.

5

Flat Earth Theory / Neil DeGrasse Tyson is Wrong

« on: January 27, 2016, 06:39:20 AM »

Anyone who wants to challenge NdG Tyson has to point out his blatant ignorance on the most fundamental equations of science:





Here is the transcript from episode 10 (The electric boy) from the Cosmos series, hosted by NdG Tyson:

http://www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk/view_episode_scripts.php?tv-show=cosmos-a-spacetime-odyssey-2014&episode=s01e10

When Maxwell translated Faraday's experimental observation on electromagnetic fields into equations, he discovered an asymmetry.


In the video itself, of episode 10, The Electric Boy, at 37:37, Tyson shows this:



TYSON IS IGNORANT OF THE ORIGINAL SET OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS.

Tyson has no idea whatsoever that the four equations shown by him, in fact, DO NOT belong to Maxwell at all.

Had he done the proper research, he would have discovered the original set of equations, Maxwell's ether equations, as published in the work On Lines of Force.


Much more information here:

http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1639521#msg1639521


However, since the original set of Maxwell's equations are in fact a set of ether equations, no other FE would wish to bring this argument to a possible discussion.

6

Suggestions & Concerns / Advanced/Alternative Flat Earth Frequently Asked Questions

« on: January 24, 2016, 09:28:36 AM »

Flat Earth Theory is the key to understanding the cosmology of the Universe.

Flat Earth Theory is unified field theory, an answer to each of the most important and fundamental questions posed by physicists and chemists.

It encompasses all sciences, from quantum ether mechanics, to the field of the new radical chronology of history.


This section, the Frequently Asked Questions, is meant to provide a basic and correct understanding of the geography, physics and cosmology of the Flat Earth.



How do we know the surface of the earth is actually flat?

The most important and direct proof is the fact that the Tunguska explosion (June 30, 1908) was seen all the way from London, instantaneously (it was also observed all over Europe).

If the light from the Sun could not reach London due to curvature and/or any light reflection phenomena, then certainly NO LIGHT from an explosion which occurred at some 7 km altitude in the atmosphere could have been seen at all, at the same time, on a spherical earth.

Other important proofs: photographs which do show that there is no curvature whatsoever across the strait of Gibraltar, across the English Channel, or across Lake Ontario.


What is terrestrial and planetary/stellar gravity?

Terrestrial gravity is a force of PRESSURE and is not attractive.

This pressure is applied/exerted by telluric currents which fundamentally interact with all matter.

A telluric current is basically a subquark string which travels in double torsion fashion.

The dextrorotatory subquarks cause disintegration, decay and the influence of gravity; the laevorotatory subquarks provide the antigravitational force as exemplified in the celebrated experiments of Lamoreaux, DePalma, Kozyrev, Brown.

Magnetic monopoles are subquarks.

Through the subquarks we have a flow of bosons/antibosons.

In a conductor, which consists of the same subquark strings, these subquarks align themselves to allow the boson flow (what we actually call electricity).

Magnetism is the same phenomenon: a flow of bosons through subquarks outside a conductor, the other (electricity) a flow of bosons inside a conductor.


Planetary/stellar gravity is a rotational type of force: it is the aether/ether itself which keeps the planets and stars orbiting using double torsional forces. This double torsion force in the shape of a vortex is responsible for the movements of the heavenly bodies in a precise fashion.


What does the Earth look like?

The radius of the flat earth measures 6356.21 km.

This is the correct flat earth map:



It is covered by a dome made up of aether and ether, the very reason all Nasa missions could not have taken place as described in the official science.

Aether = medium through which the subquarks strings (ether) flow


How does the Sun orbit above the flat earth?

Rotate the tropics of Cancer and Capricorn by 23.5 degrees, and we get the upper and lower bounds for the orbit of the Sun on a flat earth.

It rises from beyond Japan and illuminates at least half of the entire surface (not a spotlight sun at all), and sets somewhere beyond Antarctica.

Then, it rises again to complete its orbit over the other half of the semicircle (approximately).


The most important part of the Sun's orbit is its precession (the westward shift of 1.5 km/year).


The shape of the Sun (and all other planets/stars) is that of a disk.

Its diameter measures some 600 meters.

It orbits at some 15-20 km above the surface of the flat earth.

There are five heavenly bodies which do have the same diameter: the Sun, the Moon, Jupiter, the Black Sun, and the Shadow Moon.

The Black Sun causes the solar eclipse and also the celebrated Allais effect.

The Black Sun emits the laevorotatory subquarks, the fundamental particle of the flat earth.


The Shadow Moon causes the lunar eclipse and emits the dextrorotatory subquarks.


Most stars and planets have a diameter of some 30 meters and orbit above the first dome (described above), and underneath the second dome (the final dome of the flat earth universe), using aether/ether as a rotational gravitational force.

7

Suggestions & Concerns / re: image size

« on: January 17, 2016, 06:43:53 AM »

"Please resize your images before posting them or utilize the forum's size modifiers (e.g. width=###) in order to make their display resolution smaller."

I did respond to the moderator who modified my message, but I did not receive in answer.

WHERE is this forum size modifier located? If I can change the width of the image, how is this accomplished?

8

Arts & Entertainment / Top 20 Theodor Adorno Songs

« on: January 12, 2016, 01:06:51 PM »

TOP 20 THEODOR ADORNO SONGS


20. Bridge Over Troubled Waters

In 1970, without the support of more Adorno songs, Simon and Garfunkel's career as a group was over. Adorno also wrote Mrs. Robinson.


19. Lola

A modified Something, an extraodinary work signed Adorno again.

Both Something and Lola were created by reworking one of the most beautiful scores ever written, the Adagio from Spartacus, by Khachaturian:



Adorno also modified Something into the Rain Song, which was given to Led Zeppelin.


18. Tuesday Afternoon

A modified A Day In The Life (originally given to the Beatles).


17. I'm A Believer

It is commonly perceived that I'm A Believer (Monkees) was written by Neil Diamond; it was not. It was another Adorno song, a modified Help. Whether that was going to be another Beatles single in second half of 1966, we will never know; obviously after the disappearance of Paul from the public scene, and after John left the band too, everyone had to wait until January-February of 1967 for Penny Lane/Strawberry Fields to be released. Now, there is no way that Neil Diamond would have had the courage to modify Help to turn into I'm A Believer; only Adorno could modify classical scores, and was also allowed to modify Beatles songs to give to other artists/groups.

Obviously the legend behind the song was offered to the public in order not to attract attention that in the era of the Beatles and the Rolling Stones another song of the same quality would peak at no.1 in 1966, and would become the biggest selling record of 1967.

I'm A Believer is another Adorno masterpiece, perhaps intended originally for the Beatles, clearly a modified version of Help.


16. Jumping Jack Flash

One of the very best songs ever written by Adorno, a modified Satisfaction; he also transformed Satisfaction into What Is Life which was actually a Beatles song; after Adorno's death in August 6, 1969, all the remaining Beatles songs (Maybe I'm Amazed, Live And Let Die, Give Me Love, Imagine, My Love, Admiral Holsy, Dark Horse, Another Day) were given to McCartney II, Lennon II and Harrison. The Stones were able to survive for some years after 1970 with the remaining Adorno songs they had at their disposal (Angie, Can't You Hear Me Knocking, Brown Sugar), but after 1976 they had to find new songwriters.


15. Light My Fire

A modified Ritual Fire Dance by De Falla (one can observe the similarities by listening to Jose Feliciano's version). Adorno also modified Light My Fire into Aqualung which was given to Jethro Tull.


14. Happy Together

A modified Penny Lane.


13. A tie: God Only Knows and Pinball Wizard

A modified Question (offered to the Moody Blues), given to The Who.

A modified Michelle given to the Beach Boys.


12. Nights In White Satin

One of the greatest songs written by Adorno, a modified Swan Lake by Tchaikovsky.


11. Kashmir

A full analysis of the song scored by Adorno, here:

http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg770568#msg770568 (includes an analysis of more Led Zeppelin songs written by Adorno, and also more Beatles songs)

Adorno also wrote Beck's Bolero (1966), a modified We Can Work It Out. He also scored See Emily Play given to Pink Floyd.


10. Live And Let Die

This song, written by Adorno in 1968, was supposed to be the Beatles' next single in 1970. A modified Magical Mystery Tour.


9. Martha My Dear

The best song on the White Album, a modified Martha by Von Flotow.


8. Blackbird

The most haunting ballad written for the Beatles, together with the masterpiece Yesterday.

A modified Fernando Sor, Etude (Op. 60 No.19)



However, Adorno added elements from both the Hungarian Fantasy (Liszt) and the second movement of Beethoven's 7th Symphony.


7. Yellow Submarine

Actually the theme from Verdi's Aida combined the Toreador song from Carmen by Bizet.


6. Got To Get You Into My Life

A modified Can't Buy Me Love (actually Aine Kleine Nacht Musik by Mozart).


5. A tie: Penny Lane and Something

Penny Lane - Mozart's Piano Concerto No. 21 (Elvira Madigan)

Something - Adagio from Spartacus, Khachaturian


4. Yesterday

A modified Neapolitan song, called "Piccere' Che Vene a Dicere"


3. Sgt. Pepper

Sgt. Pepper is clever combination of the Radetzky March and the Romanian rhapsody no 1 by Enescu


2. Hey Jude

For Hey Jude, Adorno pulled out all stops, he grouped into one song, masterfully, the Ride of the Walkiries by Wagner, the theme from the Piano Concerto no. 1 by Tchaikovsky, and the theme from Symphony no 9 by Beethoven.


1. A Hard Day's Night

The biggest monster hit of the entire rock-pop era, from the best Beatles LP by the same name.

A modified Rossini's Wilhelm Tell overture.



http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg805137#msg805137 (full analysis of the work done by Adorno for the Beatles)

9

Suggestions & Concerns / Changes to the FAQ

« on: January 06, 2016, 08:09:13 PM »

We're perfectly happy to make changes to the FAQ. All you need to do is write them up and put them on S&C for public approval. Once you have the members' support for your changes, I'll gladly introduce them for you.

No other member is going to support to do the right thing: delete the entire faq and start all over again using the correct FET.

As things stand right now, the most that can be done is to add another subsection here:

http://wiki.tfes.org/The_Flat_Earth_Wiki

That is, after Frequently Asked Questions, another (new) section:

Advanced Flat Earth Theory (Flat Earth Ether Physics)


Either give me the power to edit ONLY that section (that is, I will add certain links which deal with terrestrial gravity, ether physics, and much more), or we will do it one special topic at a time right here.

10

Flat Earth Community / Flat Earth Cosmographia

« on: September 20, 2015, 07:12:51 PM »

There is no need to have four volumes to present FET.

And certainly you do not know how to present it, how to sell it to the public.


The best place to start is to show to the reader why the RE does not work at all: the failed big bang/space time continuum hypotheses, the refutation of relativity, why there is no such thing as attractive gravity.

Do not under any circumstances put forward the bogus, science fiction UA acceleration story: you will lose any potential FE believer, as you show that you do not have a proper understanding of gravitational theories.

Then one must show that the Earth is actually stationary, well before presenting its true shape.

Then, and only then, we make the transition, using the fact that a stationary earth must have a flat surface (the fact that terrestrial gravity must a force of pressure exerted by the telluric currents).



This would be one way to write the book.


If a more direct approach is needed, then start with the Tunguska explosion file.

No FE textbook is complete or could be written without the very important idea which I discovered and presented in my Advanced FET pages thread: since the precession CANNOT be due to a moving/rotating Earth (axial precession), then, given the distance between the two tropics on the correct flat earth map, the history of the world could not possibly be more than 500 years old (solar precession at 1.5 km/year, a distance of approximately 1060 km alloted for each of the six sections).

One volume, in less than 150 pages, takes care of business in the most straightforward and spectacular manner...

11

Science & Alternative Science / BlazeLabs on Pressure Gravity

« on: December 16, 2013, 08:29:22 AM »

www.blazelabs.com/f-g-dist.asp

What did Newton think about gravity

Note that Newton never stated that gravity is necessarily an attractive force. In fact we find that both the concept of gravitational 'pull' and that of being an inherent property of matter are specifically denied by Newton himself to whom the concept is most often erroneously ascribed.

 For we find that about fourteen years after his culminating work in gravity, this topic is addressed by Newton in four letters he sent to Doctor Bentley. In his second letter, dated January 17, 1692-3, he says in reply to one from Bentley :

You sometimes speak of gravity as essential and inherent to matter. Pray do not ascribe that notion to me, for the cause of gravity is what I do not pretend to know, and therefore would take more time to consider of it. In his third letter, dated February 25,1692-3, he expresses himself somewhat less guardedly : It is inconceivable that inanimate brute matter should, without the mediation of something else which is not material, operate upon and affect other matter, without mutual contact, as it must do if gravitation in the sense of Epicurus be essential and inherent in it. And this is one reason why I desired you would not ascribe 'innate gravity' to me. That gravity should be innate, inherent, and essential to matter, so that one body may act upon another at a distance, through a vacuum, without the mediation of anything else, by and through which their action and force may be conveyed from one to another,is to me so great an absurdity, that I believe no man who has in philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it. Gravity must be caused by an agent acting constantly according to certain laws; but whether this agent be material or immaterial, I have left to the consideration of my readers.

 And again, in the conclusion of the third book of his Principia, Newton remarks :

Hitherto I have not been able to discover the cause of those properties of gravity from phenomena, and I frame no hypothesis ; for whatever is not deduced from the phenomena is to be called an hypothesis...As soon as one frees himself from the innate force concept, it becomes obvious that the most obvious way for an external agent to move two bodies towards each other is for it to PUSH them towards each other.

"and we derive from the celestial phenomena the forces of gravity with which bodies tend to the sun and the several planets. Then from these forces, by other propositions which are also mathematical, we deduce the motions of the planets, the comets, the moon, and the sea. I wish we could derive the rest of the phenomena of nature by the same kind of reasoning from mechanical principles; for I am induced by many reasons to suspect that they may all depend upon certain forces by which the particles of bodies, by some causes hitherto unknown, are either mutually impelled towards each other, and cohere in regular figures, or are repelled and recede from each other; which forces being unknown, philosophers have hitherto attempted the search of nature in vain; but I hope the principles here laid down will afford some light either to this or some truer method of philosophy."

Even more specifically, in Query 31 he affirms the following:"How these attractions may be performed I do not here consider. What I call attraction may be caused by impulse, or by some other means unknown to me. I use that word here to signify only in general any force by which bodies tend toward one another, whatsoever be the cause."

On page 2 of Principia, Newton wrote that gravity can be either an impelled or attractive force as follows, "A centripetal force is that by which bodies are drawn or impelled, or in any way tend, towards a point as to a center. Of this sort is gravity."

Searching in his early notebooks under the heading "Quaestiones" Newton speculates that gravity is caused by the descent of rays which strike all bodies and pushes them down. "Whither ye rays of gravity may be stopped by reflecting or refracting ..."



http://www.blazelabs.com/f-g-rpress.asp

In fact, cosmic waves have far greater penetrating power than the man-made gamma radiation, and can even pass through a thickness of two metres of lead. The highest frequency possible, that is, the shortest wavelength limit is equal to the dimension of the unit element making up space-time itself, equal to Planck length, radiating at a frequency of 7.4E42Hz.

As you might be thinking already, the radiation pressure exerted by such high frequency radiation, in the top part of the EM spectrum, would be a perfect candidate for the gravity effect, since such radiation would penetrate ANY matter and act all over its constituent particles, not just its surface. The radiation can be visualised as a shower of high energy EM waves imparting impulses of momentum to all bodies in space. It also explains the great difficulty we have to shield anything from such force. The energy of each individual photon is a crucial component of the momentum necessary to create pressure for gravity to be possible. The shadow of incoming high energy EM wave packets can be pictured as the carriers of the gravitational force, the normal role assigned to the theoretical graviton. Hence, gravitons have been theorised due to the lack of knowledge of radiation pressure and radiation shadowing, and that's why they will never be detected. If photons represent the luminance of electromagnetic radiation, then, gravitons represent the shadowing and can be considered as negative energy waves, lack of photons or photon-holes.


http://www.blazelabs.com/f-g-intro.asp

12

Science & Alternative Science / Gizeh Pyramid: Aether and Ether Chambers

« on: December 14, 2013, 10:42:10 AM »

Ninurta (Nimrod) found inside the pyramid...

"....Escorted by the Chief Mineralmaster, Ninurta inspected the array of "stones" and instruments. As he stopped by each one of them, he determined its destiny - to be smashed up and destroyed, to be taken away for display, or to be installed as instruments elsewhere. We know of these "destinies" and of the order in which Ninurta had stopped by the stones, from the text inscribed on tablets 10-13 of the epic poem Lugal-e. It is by following and correctly interpreting this text that the mystery of the purpose and functions of many features of the pyramid’s inner structure can be finally understood.

"Going up the Ascending Passage, Ninurta reached its junction with the imposing Grand Gallery and a Horizontal Passage. Ninurta followed the Horizontal Passage first, reaching a large chamber with a corbelled roof. Called "vulva" in the Ninharsag poem, this chamber’s axis lay exactly on the east-west center line of the pyramid. Its emission ("an outpouring which is like a lion whom no one dares attack") came from a stone fitted into a niche that was hollowed out in the east wall. It was the SHAM ("Destiny") Stone. Emitting a red radiance which Ninurta "saw in the darkness," it was the pulsating heart of the pyramid. But it was anathema to Ninurta, for during the battle, when he was aloft, this stone’s "strong power" was used " to grab to kill me, with a tracking which kills to seize me." He ordered it "pulled out... be taken apart... and to obliteration be destroyed."

Among other features, Ninurta encountered:

"....Whereas in the narrow passages only " a deem green light glowed," the Gallery glittered in multicolored lights - "its vault is like a rainbow, the darkness ends there." The many-hued glows were emitted by twenty-seven pairs of diverse crystal stones that were evenly spaced along the whole length of each side of the Gallery.... each crystal stone emitted a different radiance, giving the place its rainbow effect....

Ninurta’s priority was the uppermost Grand Chamber and its pulsating stone.... he reached the Antichamber of unique design...."There three portcullises - "the bolt, the bar and the lock" of the Sumerian poem - elaborately fitted into grooves in the walls and floor, hermetically sealed off the uppermost Grand Chamber: "to foe it is not opened...." But now, by pulling some cords, the portcullises were raised, and Ninurta passed through.

"He was now in the pyramid’s most restricted ("sacred") chamber, from which the guiding "Net" (radar?) was "spread out" to "survey Heaven and Earth...." It responded to vibrations with bell-like resonance. The heart of the guidance unit was the GUG Stone ("Direction Determining").... Ninurta ordered this stone destroyed: "Then, by the fate-determining Ninurta, on that day was the Gug stone from its hollow taken out and smashed."

Finally there was the Apex Stone of the Pyramid, the UL ("High As The Sky") Stone: "Let the mother’s offspring see it no more," he ordered. And, as the stone was sent crashing down, "let everyone distance himself," he shouted. The "Stones," which were "anathema" to Ninurta, were no more.
 



http://www.eridu.co.uk/Author/egypt/rivaldunn.html

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_piramide.htm#inicio

http://www.mysteriousworld.com/Journal/2003/Summer/Osiria/