http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/scholar
1. a learned or erudite person, especially one who has profound knowledge of a particular subject.
Right. You don't display a profound knowledge of this particular subject. You've just pasted a couple of quotes from some other people who do. Good work?
So clearly, he was talking about Werner Von Braun, not his brother who visited a few times. The author of the article even states that we have no reason to doubt his story.
At this point you're going out of your way to misrepresent your own author: "...We have no reason to doubt the story altogether.
Yet it may rest on a case of mistaken identity. In September 1944 Wernher von Braun assigned his younger brother Magnus, a twenty-five-year-old chemical engineer and Luftwaffe pilot, as his special liaison to the Mittelwerk, particularly for servomotor production, which was afflicted with serious technical problems. Although still an employee of Peenemunde, Magnus von Braun stayed in the Nordhausen area full-time until the evacuation of April 1945. In contrast, his elder brother visited the Mittelwerk, by his estimates, twelve or fifteen times in total."
You're don't represent your own sources honestly, and you haven't done any scholarship of your own. Since your authors obviously disagree with your conclusions, and since they actually are scholars on the subject (presumably), then I'm not sure why you think you have any credibility on the matter.
I am reaching out to newspapers in attempt to get this story published. This is a matter the public deserves to know about.
So you're saying that the public is poorly informed on the information you discovered in (waitforit) Time Magazine... So you're reaching out to newspapers to
lol nevermind it's cool this is an awesome plan 10/10