I know what parallax is. You didn't address my question at all, otherwise you would have abundant evidence for parallax happening between the stars in universe. If the entire universe is whirling, spinning, expanding faster and faster, objects getting more distant, then it seems all to perfect to me that we observe the same phenomena century after century in the night sky. Of course the excuse is that the stars are trillions of light years away, because yet again, they just have to be.
How did I not address your question?
Simple experiment.
Place something one inch away from your eye and move it slowly one inch.
Then go 50 feet away and have someone move the object slowly one inch.
Which appeared to move further from your perspective?
Same reason why the night sky does not appear to change.
If you know about parallax then you can use it to see differences. I also mentioned a star you can observe that is relatively close to Earth and you do not need a life time of observations to chart its changing position in the night sky.
No stars are not real far away because they need to be. Aetheratic winds, self illuminating moon, bioluminescent life on the moon, weather system on the moon, Aetheratic refraction, universal acceleration and more exist because they need to. If not point to the evidence beyond someone or yourself just saying it.
When I first came here I was interested and looked at the evidence provided. Got put off a little by the first three things I could verify were either mistakes with measuring distances, someone misreading some thing and someone maybe not understanding the methodology of an experiment. If it was not that then it is blatantly an attempt to support FE by fudging the numbers and misrepresenting stuff.
I continued to read some other stuff and found it not back by anything except conjecture. If you do find something like a reproducible experiment or observation that I can make please point it out.