http://home.web.cern.ch/about/physics/dark-matter
I could go on about how each link you posted offers no concrete evidence for dark matter, but that would be a waste of my time. So I'll just summarize by quoting one paragraph from one of the links.
"One idea is that it could contain "supersymmetric particles" – hypothesized particles that are partners to those already known in the Standard Model. Experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) may provide more direct about dark matter."
And each link goes on like this. There is no evidence for dark matter here. You might as well have just linked me to the wikipedia article on dark matter. Please try again.
Lets be clear: Anyone who says that Dark Matter is science fact is lying or ignorant, it is a hypothesis. What can be said is follows: If gravity is true, there must be something that is conventionally undetectable and exerts a gravitational force. This unseen thing is likely matter, since it exhibits the required density to reasonably account for the amount of gravity missing, whereas energy tends to exhibit a very small gravitational attraction.
Now, seeing as gravity is almost certainly true, there is almost certainly dark matter, whatever it ends up constituting. I say almost certainly true, because the other possibility is that we are facing a paradigm shifting discovery, where whatever gravitational inducing material is missing turns out to be a massive and hitherto unforseen failure of gravitational theory. This would be extremely surprising since gravitational theory has not been remotely close to this level of variance before and it seems reasonable, according to Occam's Razor, to conclude that we are just not seeing everything we can.
If you wish to deny gravity's existence that is fine, but, as I am sure you are aware, it requires a lot of conspiracy finger pointing and hand waving.