I've done sufficient research to make an informed decision about which team I'm on.
You have demonstrated otherwise. Understanding the subject will be a prerequisite to you having a meaningful discussion.
Considering that I have not discussed any specific aspects of what I do or do not know about the shape of the Earth, how precisely have I demonstrated that I lack sufficient knowledge to participate in the discussion that I myself initiated?
It could be argued that you, as a proponent of FET, have demonstrated a clear lack of understanding of basic physics. Therefore, by your logic, you don’t meet the prerequisites to participate in a meaningful discussion on this topic. A topic which has comically devolved from simple question about whether these debates ever sway either side, into one largely about wrapping paper around basketballs.
Have you ever thought about how a single explanation—a spherical earth—effortlessly explains literally everything that gets debated on this forum, and a flat earth requires a vast, ever-growing trove of separate explanations for each aspect?
The truth is right under your feet. It’s just a lot less fun than being in this elite club of special enlightened people who think they know more than all the great thinkers mankind has ever produced.