Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
A lovely video. Thank you for tracking it down.Firstly, the people who have made the video might have expected a larger amount of people to view this video. Secondly, who’s to say the people who has made this video did not use CGI or “fancy editing skills” to construct this video.
Has anyone looked at the budget of faking such a video?
It would seem to require almost 4hrs of photo-realistic CG, which puts it far beyond Avatar's budget of 237 million USD.
All that for 22k views? I think not.
Hi, I'm a new-comer. I found this website via youtube, when I saw Shane Dawson mention it in one of his conspiracy theory videos, talking about why the earth might be flat, I think the proof he had was astonishing, since I used to love NASA, and I don't get swayed easily. I'm looking for someone I can debate theories with.I will gladly help you get more people for you debate with, just to a certain extent, like, forum rules.Code: [Select]FlatEarth
That is a great argument but I would say that the refractions do not make the water look flat, it is flat on its own.Why shouldn't there be refraction effects that can make a round earth look flat when there a number of refraction and/or perspective effects that make a flat earth look round?QuoteUnfortunately, most of his experiments have been invalidated due to the proximity of his telescope to the surface of the river, where the effects of refraction are strongest.
Incorrect. Such an argument is supposing that there is a refraction effect that makes a Round Earth look like a Flat Earth.
If the North Pole is all around the edge, how do you explain direct northern hemisphere flights? They would take like 3 times longer and fly over completely different terrain on your map.It would be of a different location then they (the government) says it is.
Then you're not engaging in honest, in-depth debate.Most of your answers are inquisitive, may you please send me more so I can answer them?
How can you expect to be taken seriously when you have no model, no good genuine explanations, and no answers to the most basic of questions?
I just want to comment that Bobby seemed to have spent some time looking at something from the videos, which he deleted. I thought about it and had something to respond with. I am more than happy to look at it with him if he were to repost it in the main forums.I have more strong evidence of the FE because of you, may you please send me more info, I just want to make more people shift their opinion to the FE theory.
This forum is basically just a a library and list of materials to organize for reference; which may eventually become supplementary or depreciated when we eventually get a flat tube, a user collaborative library, or other option available.
What I say is that beyond ice barrier is believed to be the outside of the dome. But the real question is what's beyond the dome?I have asked this several times and nobody has answered me. If I truly want to believe the earth is flat, I would like to know what's over the ice wall.
If you believe in an ice wall model then what's over the ice wall depends on what ice wall flat earth model you believe in. In those models that have an ice wall will respond in one of many ways.
-Space is over the ice wall
-Heaven is over the ice wall
-the firmament is over the ice wall
-the dome is over the ice wall
-no one knows what's over the ice wall
-you can't climb over the ice wall
Many flat earth models don't believe in an ice wall. The flat earth model that I most relate to is that the earth is an infinitely repeating plane with no ice wall.So you're saying if I go to Antarctica and walk straight south I won't come up on the other side of the earth facing north?
Again this depends on your flat earth model. In an infinitely repeating flat plane model if you went to Antarctica and walked south you would end up on the other side of the infinitely repeating flat plane facing north.
Some models would say that it's impossible to walk south from antartica
Some models will say that Antarctica does not existHow has nobody discovered this yet if there are research facilities in both the north and south pole? This is a legit question, i am curious what you guys are thinking.
Again the answers varies. The research facilites set up on the poles were set up with round earth equipment and devices using round earth systems so they are only able to show the earth is round.
I'd complain here, I'm on the discord if you want me to make a personal army request.Scammers, their just a growing yet outrageous community, if you really think about it you can get scammed by people just using an ad to tell of an idea, you buy it, they recieve and it doesn’t work as expected.
How much do you know about the company? These guys can usually put ransomware on an entire network of scammers.
Can you not just use a weather balloon with a decent video camera to see if the earth is flat or round? I don't see how this could be faked if a flat-earther did it and it would either prove or disprove the flat earth theory.It could not, mainly because of the atmosphere which will prevent it from going far just out of sight, you can imagine it from there.
I would suggest starting with the wiki and FAQ.So, am I able to create an essay (using all the sources linked) for my own personal use?
If you have specific questions that aren't covered there, then feel free to ask.
Here is an answer to that question:Yes, more evidence to show that the Flat Earth theory is considered an important and controversial topic.
Q. If the planets are round, why isn't the earth?
A. The earth is not a planet. The earth very large and unlike the characteristics of the wandering stars called "planets" in numerous ways. This is like asking why basketballs are round, but not the basketball court. The basketball court is a fundamentally different kind of entity than the small balls which may bounce upon its surface.
We have seen what is shown in this video many times, and don't need any authoratative approval. However, for those who do, a PhD performed water convexity experiments, sees zero curvature, discusses refraction, and comes to the conclusion that reality best supports the Flat Earth.I very much think of the FE theory is true, and this just shows that Flat Earthers are right.
Here is an answer to that question:Why is that question asked so much? I mean come on it is not reliable to the Earth and should not be a question, it’s an annoyance
Q. If the planets are round, why isn't the earth?
A. The earth is not a planet. The earth very large and unlike the characteristics of the wandering stars called "planets" in numerous ways. This is like asking why basketballs are round, but not the basketball court. The basketball court is a fundamentally different kind of entity than the small balls which may bounce upon its surface.