# The Flat Earth Society

## Flat Earth Discussion Boards => Flat Earth Media => Topic started by: İntikam on April 28, 2016, 04:50:15 AM

Title: All of my working will be here
Post by: İntikam on April 28, 2016, 04:50:15 AM
Description of the "disappearance"

In populer science, nothing will imperishable if it is presence, nothing will created is it is imperishable. But actually this is a nonsence!

In the real life this is possible.

definition:

To disappearance a pair of substance or a paior of an energy when it encounters the opposite, is called "disappearance".

in mathemathichal:

+1 - 1 = 0

On the graphic:

(http://i.imgsafe.org/71f422d.jpg)
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: İntikam on April 28, 2016, 04:51:11 AM
Description of the "Creation"

definition:

To making a pair of substance or a paior of an energy with the opposite  from The zero point, is called creation.

in mathemathichal:

0 = +1 -1

Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: İntikam on April 28, 2016, 04:52:20 AM
Flat Earth Proof: Rain comes from sky and clouds just an evaporation effect

As we know that meteorology knows where is the next rain fall down by looking the clouds. And we think that so the clouds cause the rain. This is not true.

God said us on the various different books that the rain falls down from the sky.

As we surely know that the sky is an ocean that surrounding us. It is reasonable to be in ice to don't fall down . when it melt to water then into rain water .

To understand the mechanism we need to look this image to understand it well.

(https://i.imgsafe.org/6eb33b3.jpg)

Cloudless rain.

This one is better

Cloudless rain is possible. Because raining don't need a cloud. Clouds are not reason, clouds are result!
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: İntikam on April 28, 2016, 04:53:48 AM
Globe Earth Debunk: Why aren't there majority of the clouds on the oceans?

We see the truth, so rain comes from the sky, don't come from evaporation caused by high temperature on the oceans. If it's true,

1- Why aren't there majority of the clouds on the oceans?
2- Sometimes a cloudy day it's not raining and sometimes it's raining with a few clouds on a sunny day. These cases show us the clouds aren't the exact cause for occuring the rain.
3- We must see the clouds on the oceans on every day in summer because it such as boiling pans. But we don't ! And sunny days the air in the ocean usually open like the lands.
4- We must see the clouds usually moving from oceans and seas to lands but this situation does not usually occur. Clous move random.

These substances can be increased.

(http://i64.tinypic.com/140ah3p.jpg)

Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: İntikam on April 28, 2016, 04:55:37 AM
will be continued...
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: Jura-Glenlivet on April 28, 2016, 07:37:15 AM

I can't wait!
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: İntikam on April 28, 2016, 10:42:53 AM

I can't wait!

You are waiting for what?
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: İntikam on April 30, 2016, 03:55:56 PM
Why the world isn't a big magnet:

1- The earth is not a big magnet. If it is, then it causes neurological problems on all human in the world.
2- Anything not stuck to the world.

Calculating the center and depth of the earth by using a compass.

(https://i.imgsafe.org/65b0b38.jpg)

Control: Using another compass far away to first compass.

(https://i.imgsafe.org/1dce618.png)

For prove or debunk it somebody need to use a compass on the Antarctica. If it shows about horizontal then the earth has one magnetic pole on the center and there isn't another pole. If it shows the bottom ot the earth then;

If the earth has two magnetic poles and one of them is the "South Pole" ; or the earth is a sphere. Or there is another magnetic case we dont understand it.

Edit. Notice:

This theory depends on the force between charged particles. F= KQq/R^2

Here is;

F= Force
K= a constant
Q= charge of the earth
q= charge of the Compass bar
R= The distance between the center of the earth and the compass.

(https://i.imgsafe.org/d7694f6.jpg)

(https://i.imgsafe.org/5c2dc64.jpg)

(http://i63.tinypic.com/2d6k4j.jpg)

Test2:

I see that Bacgammon board has a few nails and these facts the measurement. So this test i used a wooden game board.

L= 15cm = 150mm
H= 3mm

R= 5.091 kms (From Istanbul to Geographic North)

h (center of the earth) = 3*5091 / 150 = 102 kms

H (depth of the earth) = 2*3*5091/150 = 204 kms

This test isn't  consistent with first . one of them is wrong.

probably this measurement is more accurate than first.

Test3:

Board is same board that used on test2

L= 15cm = 150mm
H= 2,5mm

R= 5.091 kms (From Istanbul to Geographic North)

h (center of the earth) = 2,5*5091 / 150 = 85 kms

H (depth of the earth) = 2*2,5*5091/150 = 170 kms
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: İntikam on May 09, 2016, 05:35:55 AM
Hello guys.

Today we will destroy a lie: "nuclear power of the uranium". This is a lie. The world is here about tousends of years, did you see any nation that lived old times whose heated by firing the uranium? I don't remember and you?

As you know that i don't believe the meteors and call them as "fallen stars". Meteors are firing when falling down because they are stars.

(http://i.imgsafe.org/b6af341.jpeg)

A star has "about" infinitive energy. How can we understand this? Because they are firing since tousends of years and unquenchable.

Some of the nations know this truth and they are using the meteor parts as combustible and calling it "nuclear energy".

Same nations buying the parts of meteors by "very high price". Because they need to parts or the meteors for continue to working the "nucler reactor (?)".

"Nuclear energy is a lie". Uranium is a lie. Nuclear power is a lie. The only truth is "infinitive star energy".
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: andruszkow on May 09, 2016, 06:53:39 AM
Hello guys.

Today we will destroy a lie: "nuclear power of the uranium". This is a lie. The world is here about tousends of years, did you see any nation that lived old times whose heated by firing the uranium? I don't remember and you?

As you know that i don't believe the meteors and call them as "fallen stars". Meteors are firing when falling down because they are stars.

(http://i.imgsafe.org/b6af341.jpeg)

A star has "about" infinitive energy. How can we understand this? Because they are firing since tousends of years and unquenchable.

Some of the nations know this truth and they are using the meteor parts as combustible and calling it "nuclear energy".

Same nations buying the parts of meteors by "very high price". Because they need to parts or the meteors for continue to working the "nucler reactor (?)".

"Nuclear energy is a lie". Uranium is a lie. Nuclear power is a lie. The only truth is "infinitive star energy".
Will anyone from the TFES please clarify whether they agree with this or not? :)
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: İntikam on May 09, 2016, 07:56:50 AM
Hello guys.

Today we will destroy a lie: "nuclear power of the uranium". This is a lie. The world is here about tousends of years, did you see any nation that lived old times whose heated by firing the uranium? I don't remember and you?

As you know that i don't believe the meteors and call them as "fallen stars". Meteors are firing when falling down because they are stars.

(http://i.imgsafe.org/b6af341.jpeg)

A star has "about" infinitive energy. How can we understand this? Because they are firing since tousends of years and unquenchable.

Some of the nations know this truth and they are using the meteor parts as combustible and calling it "nuclear energy".

Same nations buying the parts of meteors by "very high price". Because they need to parts or the meteors for continue to working the "nucler reactor (?)".

"Nuclear energy is a lie". Uranium is a lie. Nuclear power is a lie. The only truth is "infinitive star energy".
Will anyone from the TFES please clarify whether they agree with this or not? :)

İntikam works alone.  8)
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: andruszkow on May 09, 2016, 01:54:25 PM
Hello guys.

Today we will destroy a lie: "nuclear power of the uranium". This is a lie. The world is here about tousends of years, did you see any nation that lived old times whose heated by firing the uranium? I don't remember and you?

As you know that i don't believe the meteors and call them as "fallen stars". Meteors are firing when falling down because they are stars.

(http://i.imgsafe.org/b6af341.jpeg)

A star has "about" infinitive energy. How can we understand this? Because they are firing since tousends of years and unquenchable.

Some of the nations know this truth and they are using the meteor parts as combustible and calling it "nuclear energy".

Same nations buying the parts of meteors by "very high price". Because they need to parts or the meteors for continue to working the "nucler reactor (?)".

"Nuclear energy is a lie". Uranium is a lie. Nuclear power is a lie. The only truth is "infinitive star energy".
Will anyone from the TFES please clarify whether they agree with this or not? :)

İntikam works alone.  8)
Could you then please stop referring to your "findings" as definitive facts? A lot of your assumptions and statements are pretty far from whats usually defined as facts, even by FET. It makes the debates a bit cluttered, especially because every time someone argues against you, you refuse to listen.
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: thatsnice on May 09, 2016, 10:27:40 PM
Andrew, my boy, I admire the effort, but he's just going to bitch and moan about how we are "the hoaxers" and  "telling him the fables" and how you shouldn't be talking to him in his information repository.
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: İntikam on May 10, 2016, 08:20:47 AM
Hello guys.

Today we will destroy a lie: "nuclear power of the uranium". This is a lie. The world is here about tousends of years, did you see any nation that lived old times whose heated by firing the uranium? I don't remember and you?

As you know that i don't believe the meteors and call them as "fallen stars". Meteors are firing when falling down because they are stars.

(http://i.imgsafe.org/b6af341.jpeg)

A star has "about" infinitive energy. How can we understand this? Because they are firing since tousends of years and unquenchable.

Some of the nations know this truth and they are using the meteor parts as combustible and calling it "nuclear energy".

Same nations buying the parts of meteors by "very high price". Because they need to parts or the meteors for continue to working the "nucler reactor (?)".

"Nuclear energy is a lie". Uranium is a lie. Nuclear power is a lie. The only truth is "infinitive star energy".
Will anyone from the TFES please clarify whether they agree with this or not? :)

İntikam works alone.  8)
Could you then please stop referring to your "findings" as definitive facts? A lot of your assumptions and statements are pretty far from whats usually defined as facts, even by FET. It makes the debates a bit cluttered, especially because every time someone argues against you, you refuse to listen.

I'm working on my own theories, but these are based on the fact that the world is flat. THE FES is not a corporate structure, it's a truth with a way you look at life. it doesn't matter to me what others think, I will defend the truth in every situation. What others believe is not my problem.

I do not have sufficient data to convince you. but if you want that I can change your perspective on life. if you don't i can nothing.

you're used to someone research on your behalf. so you can't understand our perspective on life.

FET not a religion like "RET". Because we think, research and calculate. But RE's usually taking the same knowledge what somebody say like NASA, school teacher, grandfather, etc. then, according to this belief, developing an argument, or argue that existing arguments. These are superstitions. We investigate, and then we can defend it.  Anyone "convince" I'm not trying to. Explore for yourself, measure for yourself and find out for yourself. Fe's including me usually often think like this so they ain't going to convince each other. if necessary this can be done.

I claim no one did a "persuasive draw" the velocity "diagram" of the atmosphere. Can you explore this?
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: thatsnice on May 10, 2016, 12:57:47 PM
I claim no one did a "persuasive draw" the velocity "diagram" of the atmosphere. Can you explore this?
I would if I knew would you were asking for.
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: İntikam on May 10, 2016, 01:54:26 PM
I claim no one did a "persuasive draw" the velocity "diagram" of the atmosphere. Can you explore this?
I would if I knew would you were asking for.

Then who know let him come and done.
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: thatsnice on May 10, 2016, 03:41:34 PM
I claim no one did a "persuasive draw" the velocity "diagram" of the atmosphere. Can you explore this?
I would if I knew would you were asking for.

Then who know let him come and done.

Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: İntikam on May 10, 2016, 07:03:28 PM
I claim no one did a "persuasive draw" the velocity "diagram" of the atmosphere. Can you explore this?
I would if I knew would you were asking for.

Then who know let him come and done.

You don't need to understand me. Who understand my wording let him come and speak.
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: andruszkow on May 10, 2016, 09:56:56 PM
I claim no one did a "persuasive draw" the velocity "diagram" of the atmosphere. Can you explore this?
I would if I knew would you were asking for.

Then who know let him come and done.

You don't need to understand me. Who understand my wording let him come and speak.
I'm pretty sure he wants to answer, but he doesn't understand the English in your post.
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: AnswerTheQuestion on June 01, 2016, 06:37:25 PM
Any more "findings", Intikam?

Also, it is clear that your English is not correct. I don't know what the fuck a "persuasive draw" is. I know being a grammar nazi is against the rules, but all of Intikam's findings could be correct and verifiable, yet we can't understand a word of it.
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: İntikam on June 02, 2016, 01:15:53 PM
Any more "findings", Intikam?

Also, it is clear that your English is not correct. I don't know what the fuck a "persuasive draw" is. I know being a grammar nazi is against the rules, but all of Intikam's findings could be correct and verifiable, yet we can't understand a word of it.

I'm so busy on that days so can't continue the hard issues or new subjects.
Title: What pushes the objects to down?
Post by: İntikam on September 09, 2016, 07:33:57 AM
It is a knowledge that almost everything pushes others. To catch and to pull are not real acts. As a magnetic illusion. Magnetic illusion is the only exception. But it is still not a complete pulling, because a full merger does not occur.

When you kept a cup, actually you don't keep it, you are forcing to it to pull up. It is theorically like this, because no one of the particles never touches to the others.

This situation shows us almost everything on the nature pushes to the others.

This situation explains us two main events:

1- Difusion
2- Sky thrust (opposite theory of gravity)

1- difusion: All of objects pushes others so if one side is empty, almost all objects pushes the object which on the edge. This causes to object to move to the gap. Science calls it as diffusion".

2- Sky thrust : All of objects pushes the others.

So on the ground, Most of the objects are above on the chosen object on the ground. So the propulsion is the the greatest value. This makes the object as heavier. When the object go up, then some objects start to push it to up, though they were pushing down it Shortly before.

if an object passes the equilibrium position by going up continuously, The balance of power changes to outward then the object starts to fly with no way to return.
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: İntikam on September 09, 2016, 07:59:47 AM
Sky model.

Sun and all of the stars altitude= 6.000 kms.

Sky altitude= 12.000 kms.

(http://1.1m.yt/ToBduiw.png)
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: İntikam on September 21, 2016, 11:17:57 AM
Everything is pushes others.

When the moon comes near, it pushes the oceans. Then the water on the ocean overflows like overflowing water from a bucket.

(http://1.1m.yt/0TrGMpN.png)
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: Norr on October 12, 2016, 04:34:55 AM
Saving this space for future reply. Dear God I wish I had the words right now...
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: Boots on October 15, 2016, 05:30:49 AM
Saving this space for future reply. Dear God I wish I had the words right now...

There is no adequate response in Elvish, Entish, or the tongues of Men to this aberration.
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: İntikam on October 17, 2016, 01:27:56 PM
1 dollar cost of disproving round earth map!  :)

Get a compass 1 dollar cost.

Go open the google map and find out same road, same location. Draw a compass on the road yourself and compare them.

You'll see that some of directions are true but some of aren't. It is your chance to your test prove or disprove the map.

In Piri Reis map Istanbul European side seems as east to west, different direction of Asian side of Istanbul; and according to google it seems as Asian side and placed on East south.

(http://3.1m.yt/pvhR1Wk.jpg)

(http://2.1m.yt/zU9s_u8.jpg)

My compass prove the N on Piri reis map is true and N on google map is wrong in west side of Istanbul !

30 cents for disproving round map !  ;D

Almost all important religional structures placed the direction to real north ! This situation causes by a bit religinal and a bit climatic.

This is patriarchate. One of the most religinal structure in Istanbul. Also Turkey, and a bit for Europe. One of the most important building for Ortodoxes.

(http://3.1m.yt/Elu75rn.png)

Placed North to 40 degrees east!

This is Aya Irini. One of the most known temple in Istanbul. Placed in Topkapi Palace.

(http://3.1m.yt/40PU2rk.png)

Placed North to 40 degrees East!

This is Suleymaniye. One of two biggest mosque in Istanbul.

(http://3.1m.yt/7SMOgsC.png)

Placed North to 40 degrees East!

This is the greatest mosque in Istanbul, also in Turkey. Sultan Ahmet.

(http://3.1m.yt/rN2z1RH.png)

Placed North to 40 degrees East!

I'm calculated true north now 25 degrees east. So history have about 15 degrees mistake and google has about 20 degrees mistake. My map has about zero degrees mistake.  :)

(http://3.1m.yt/2jbCjZ.png)
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: İntikam on October 17, 2016, 01:33:51 PM
Round earth debunk: Tokyo is actually closer than shown on the map!

Hello guys,

As you know that i'm working on world map and have enought experience about fliying times and distances.

I calculated the connection about flight time and distances as follow:

Maximum value of distance is fliying time / 1,306.

Oppositely if we want to calculate fliying time as estimate, we should use this formula as a good estimate:

fliying time = distance x 1,306.

You can use this formula for calculate your fliying time to anywhere.

Anyway.

For example:

We know Europe is about almost true so i'll use a distance from Europe as an example:

Istanbul to paris shown on google as: 2.271 kms

(http://3.1m.yt/sfnEjwd.png)

2.271 kms takes 3 hours. so the ratio is 3 / 2.271 = 1,32

another example new york to san fransisco. why do i select this destination because there is a lot of flying between them:

(http://2.1m.yt/BqaErTC.png)

It has about 4123 kms distance and gets about 5:30 hours. Lets calculate the ratio:

5,5 / 4.123 = 1,33

As we see that the ratio about 1,32-1,33. I calculated it after about 200.000 fliying that 1,306 is a better estimate.

This means if you go 3.000 kms, you go about 4 hours.

Now.

There is an arror on round earth map about fliying times and proves the map is wrong:

From Japan To USA.

This is a fliying path:

(http://4.1m.yt/SnnVBOZ.png)

From Japan to San Fransisco. Path is 8.702 and gets about 8:30 hours.

Lets calculate the ratio:

ratio = 8,50 / 8.702 = 0,97

This means plane fliying with a speed higher than 1.000 kms that planes don't do that. This is impossible for average speed of planes.

Lets calculate the true distance according to this flying time:

8,50 / 1,306 = 6.500 kms. About 1200 kms closer than shown!

Tokyo is closer than shown on the map to the USA !
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: andruszkow on October 24, 2016, 07:14:56 AM
Sun rises in Lima do earlier than NY proves the earth can't be round

I know this situation proves only the round map is wrong. But it seems like good to hear.  :)

(http://4.1m.yt/1UrEmf.png)

(http://3.1m.yt/SU5lx0w.png)

(http://3.1m.yt/sddufUm.png)

There is a 1 hour difference about time zones between NY and Panama. So according to NY time, sun rising in NY at 7:18 but rises in Lima at 6:38.

As we see that sun rises earlier in Lima than New York by real time, but it seems in the west on about all of round maps.

This don't disprove the earth is a round but proves round earth map is a garbage.

Easy, basic, understandable for everyone, repeatable for everyone, fast and deadly!
Earth is tilted on its own axis, you're comparing two city's sitting on different hemispheres.
Title: Alternative seismology
Post by: İntikam on November 11, 2016, 11:45:09 AM
Alternative seismology

Ocean wawes causes  to big earthquakes.

Think about the earth as a ship. It shakes and swashes.

I want to explain how systemworks, under the pretext of this topic.

This the list of countries by has earth Seismic risk.

1.    JAPAN (80)   7.08   6.7188 %
2.    INDONESIA (57)   7.05   4.7646 %
3.    CHILE (52)   7.36   4.5405 %
4.    PAPUA NEW GUINEA (49)   6.91   4.0152 %
5.    MEXICO (36)   7.19   3.0677 %
6.    TURKEY (36)   7.01   2.9942 %
7.    ALASKA (28)   7.55    2.5056 %
8.    CALIFORNIA (30)   7.01   2.4938 %
9.    PERU (27)   7.45   2.3859 %
10.    CHINA (27)   7.38   2.3621 %
11.    VANUATU (28)   6.96   2.3112 %
12.    SOLOMON ISLANDS (23)   7.03   1.9175 %
13.    IRAN (22)   7.09   1.8499 %
14.    SUMATRA (20)   7.77    1.8428 %
15.    RUSSIA (20)   7.43   1.7621 %
16.    GREECE (19)   7.06   1.5902 %
17.    TAIWAN (18)   7.21   1.5392 %
18.    FIJI (18)   6.99   1.4918 %
19.    PHILIPPINES (16)   7.17   1.3601 %
20.    NEW ZEALAND (16)   7.16   1.3589 %

You can find out same list at: http://www.world-earthquakes.com/index.php?option=sta

Lets examine the countries in the list one by one, depends on "ship" theory.

First we should thik the earth as a ship that floating in the sea. The sea waves beats to edges. These beats cause to shaking. On the other way, the ship getting water from mediterranian area.

1    JAPAN : Is in the edge of the earth. So  the waves transfer energy by multiplying.
2.    INDONESIA: Is in the edge of the earth.
3.    CHILE : Is in the edge of the earth.
4.    PAPUA NEW GUINEA: Is in the edge of the earth.
5.    MEXICO : Is in the edge of the earth.
6.    TURKEY *: ...    We will examine it later. *
7.    ALASKA (28): Is in the edge of the earth.
8.    CALIFORNIA : Is in the edge of the earth.
9.    PERU (27) Is in the edge of the earth.
10.    CHINA (27) Is in the edge of the earth.
11.    VANUATU Is in the edge of the earth.
12.    SOLOMON ISLANDS Is in the edge of the earth.
13.    IRAN (22)*: ...    We will examine it later. *
14.    SUMATRA (20) Is in the edge of the earth.
15.    RUSSIA (20) Is in the edge of the earth.
16.    GREECE (19)*: ...    We will examine it later. *
17.    TAIWAN (18) Is in the edge of the earth.
18.    FIJI (18) Is in the edge of the earth.
19.    PHILIPPINES Is in the edge of the earth.
20.    NEW ZEALAND Is in the edge of the earth.

Lets examine other 3 countries:

6.    TURKEY
13.    IRAN
16.    GREECE

Since tousends of years Euro-Africa land crashed and got water. Then Mediterranian sea occured. Water is continue the way till that will destroy Greece-Turkey-Iran line. Will make them smaller like center America. In the other say the Turkey side of the ship is sinking in the water.

(http://2.1m.yt/ic-4iUI.png)

This is the sismology map that you can use it as an alternative theory.

For perspective of round map:

(http://3.1m.yt/g7uRcdZ.png)

This map taken from here: http://earthquaketrack.com/

The situation is clear.

Notice: The list contain risk more than 6.5 of earthquakes. Richter scale 1 degrees decreases but power 10 level decreasing. So the less earthquakes are weak as like the sway of the ship; don't effect important.

For example 6.5 richter is 10 level more than 5.5 richter. And 7,5 richter is 100 level more than 5,5.
Title: Round Earth debunk! Google map is a nonsence!
Post by: İntikam on November 11, 2016, 12:10:22 PM
As we see that google map is a nonsence and for set the real map to nonsence map, they are deleting, adding, cutting, copying, pasting,turning, returning, makes somersaults, and he's making it up.

We see this truth several times.

This simt i'll show you how google is deleting the land for set reality to nonsence round map:

You'll see a map as follow:

(http://4.1m.yt/VncjFug.png)

What did you see? An island and a ground.

You'll see a view as follow:

(http://4.1m.yt/Do8SLsI.png)

And surprise, these two places are same.  ;D

Take care the island on the map is smaller and the island on the real is bigger.

Click to map view and earth view. You see the difference exactly.

Generally they were saying us "the ice is melted". But there is a big part of ground. Whats happened to ground, is it melted?

(http://3.1m.yt/5_bROGE.png)

Now zoom the area marked as two:

You can see it by clicking this link:

(http://4.1m.yt/SbexD-y.png)

It seems like there is an "inside sea" there. Is it really?

Zoom to this point:

(http://2.1m.yt/a1Ld8nO.png)

The left side is a small mountain seems like continue but suddently cutted by "google inside sea".

Now zoom to "casey station" with earth view. Link:

(http://4.1m.yt/C4D3LoS.png)

Click to "map" now:

(http://3.1m.yt/pOEJBA4.png)

So; where all of these islands are gone?

(http://4.1m.yt/jVfqKe9.png)

Why is google doing this? Because the real and the map can't overlap. So it forcing something for gain or loose room how much requered.

add some island here there is a gap.
delete these islands there is not room for sea.

copy these islands to this place and delete this mountains to place sea there.

okey we got it. this is round map. idiots will believe this.  ;D
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: Jura-Glenlivet on November 11, 2016, 01:01:00 PM
Mmm.. Inti, most of what google does is so Inti can use it for his trip to the sea-side or Ikea, so they have very little need to map a frozen wasteland, indeed the vehicles they use to take the pictures for street view are going to struggle to cope there, even with snow tyres.
So you finding a place in the arse end of no-where that doesn't have complete coverage, probably isn't the proof of conspiracy you think it is.
Title: Re: Round Earth debunk! Google map is a nonsence!
Post by: rabinoz on November 12, 2016, 03:22:06 AM

Generally they were saying us "the ice is melted". But there is a big part of ground. Whats happened to ground, is it melted?

Now zoom to "casey station" with earth view. Link:

(http://4.1m.yt/C4D3LoS.png)

Click to "map" now:

(http://3.1m.yt/pOEJBA4.png)

So; where all of these islands are gone?

(http://4.1m.yt/jVfqKe9.png)

Why is google doing this? Because the real and the map can't overlap. So it forcing something for gain or loose room how much requered.

add some island here there is a gap.
delete these islands there is not room for sea.

copy these islands to this place and delete this mountains to place sea there.

okey we got it. this is round map. idiots will believe this.  ;D

Then, your magic islands are made of ice and snow. In case you have didn't know, ice and snow can melt in summer. So yes, your "islands" melted. See, simple.
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: İntikam on November 14, 2016, 06:23:05 AM
New Zeland 7,8.

(http://2.1m.yt/ic-4iUI.png)

As we see that New Zeland in the list 20th place and compatibled with the map.

According to this map we can wait next earthquake in Indonesia or a place near to New Ginea.
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: İntikam on November 14, 2016, 09:04:18 AM
Weather differences proves the earth is flat:

This is flat earth model:

(http://2.1m.yt/RQit_L.png)

According to this model; we should wait for differences of the -weather "highest and the lowest value of the temperature" of cities on the North, should be lower than south.

because nearest point of the sun and furter point of the sun is higher on the southern circle.

I researched some cities on the northern circle and southern circle; to find out is it differences of the weather on the north for a city in night and day. The results are astonishing.

First i grouped cities by South and north.

(http://3.1m.yt/EMjKBW7.png)

Second i  listed them by "near to sea" and far to sea.

(http://4.1m.yt/_5ulBAs.png)

The last i listed them by weather differences by night and day.

(http://4.1m.yt/uRQIGvU.png)

As we see that the results are compatibled with flat earth model.

The earth is flat.
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: İntikam on November 16, 2016, 08:34:07 AM
Why the differences of temperature of the weather in cities which on Southern Circle more than differences of temperature which cities are in Northern circle?

By this shape:

(http://i.imgsafe.org/c18b0e9ddc.png)

As we see that sun orbit on the furthest point to cities on the southern circle while sunsetting and after it, and sun orbit is in the average point to cities on the northern circle. This situation cause the differences of the night and day temperature in the cities of couthern circle is more than cities in the northern circle.

No defence!

Specific examples.

The places near to sea are not different obviously. Because cities near the seas impressed by the temperate influence of the sea. So we'll choose some cities from North and south circle are far to sea and will examine them by differences of temperature night and day.

First lets all us look to map to find out ideal cities for see the difference obviously.

This is Australia map:

Almost all cities are placed on inshore except one: Alice Springs.

(http://3.1m.yt/tJMHSZo.png)

Lets measure it to sea:

(http://3.1m.yt/C--efbl.png)

Now we'll find out other cities has the distance to sea as 900 kms for compare it by objectivity.

Lets find another city in Southern circle:

(http://4.1m.yt/CFxmhct.png)

There are two cities seems like far to sea: Gaborone and Lusaka.

Lets measure them:

(http://3.1m.yt/iE-gGJV.png)

Gaborone has about 700 kms distance to sea. So it is not useful for our experiment.

Lets measure the other one:

(http://2.1m.yt/aR_-VCL.png)

864 kms. It is closed to 900 kms; so we selected Lusaka as a spesific city for our test.

Now we have two cities in Southern circle are far to sea about 860-900 kms. For compare them we need two other cities in Northern circle.

Lets look to North America.

(http://1.1m.yt/uqb5U7E.png)

I drawed there a line has 900 kms lenght for see about where will be stay the city which we can choose.

They seems like two cities to be possible about 900 kms to sea Edmonton and Winnipeg. Lets measure them are they true or not.

(http://4.1m.yt/Mu8cwBx.png)

We see these two cities on same image that both of them are useful for our test.

On. Now we selected 4 cities that 2 are from south and two are fron north and have distance about 900kms. Now we eliminated the factor of distance to sea.

Although we have 4 cities, we will be picking 2 new cities for North Asia and South America.

(http://1.1m.yt/HN88a6J.png)

(http://1.1m.yt/L8RUhdJ.png)

Brasilia and Novgorod are useful.

We have 6 cities that 3 from North and 3 from south and all of them are about 900 kms far to sea. We selected all of these cities by online, right here, right now.

Brasilia, Lusaka and Alice Springs from South America, South Africa and Australia which cities are far to sea about 900 kms;

Edmonton, Winnipeg and Novgorod from North America and Asia which cities are far to sea about 900 kms.

Lets do it.

This is final image:

there is a problem on upload site so i used another one.

At the end of the this working, all of 3 cities in the northern circle have lower day and night temperature differences than the cities on the south; which have same distance to the sea.

CITY /   PLACE / AVERAGE YEARLY TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCE
Novgorod     North   8,25
Edmonton    North   9,00
Winnipeg    North   10,17
Lusaka    South   10,33
Brasilia    South   11,25
Alice Springs    South   15,42

I'll add all of city data later.

Yet i added only data of January.

(http://i.imgsafe.org/b1271c216d.png)

(http://i.imgsafe.org/b12728d6db.png)

(http://i.imgsafe.org/b127327192.png)

(http://i.imgsafe.org/b12740e085.png)

(http://i.imgsafe.org/b1274ab3f4.png)

(http://i.imgsafe.org/b127540a6e.png)

imgsafe is not a safesite oppositely it's name . I'll change it later to another one. so i did'nt add all of images to it.

Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: truth on November 18, 2016, 01:33:42 AM
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: İntikam on November 21, 2016, 07:21:38 AM

replied on debate forum. Please leave alone me with this topic.
Title: Re: All of my working will be here
Post by: İntikam on November 21, 2016, 07:21:47 AM
This is flat earth model:

(http://2.1m.yt/RQit_L.png)

According to this model; we should wait for differences of the -weather "highest and the lowest value of the temperature" of cities on the North, should be lower than south.

because nearest point of the sun and furter point of the sun is higher on the southern circle.

I researched some cities on the northern circle and southern circle; to find out is it differences of the weather on the north for a city in night and day. The results are astonishing.

First i grouped cities by South and north.

(http://3.1m.yt/EMjKBW7.png)

Second i  listed them by "near to sea" and far to sea.

(http://4.1m.yt/_5ulBAs.png)

The last i listed them by weather differences by night and day.

(http://4.1m.yt/uRQIGvU.png)

As we see that the results are compatibled with flat earth model.

The earth is flat.

---

An extra working about the biggest cities around the world.

Actually this cities are not spesific for this working. Because they haven't our conditions that reveal a significant difference. Notwithstanding we'll use this list for show everybody how us are impartial and objective. But end the working i'll comment the result as the perspective of weather differences and distances fo North.

Choosen cities are:

1   Shanghai(Pudong)
2   Karachi
3   Beijing
4   São Paulo
5   Dhaka
6   Delhi*
7   Lagos
8   Istanbul
9   Tokyo(RJTT)
10   Mumbai
11   Moscow
12   Guangzhou
13   Shenzhen(Shangai)
14   Suzhou
15   Kinshasa
16   Cairo
17   Jakarta
18   Lahore
19   Seoul
20   Mexico City

These cities taken by the list of "world largest cities" : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World%27s_largest_cities

At the end of the working, we found 3 cities have lowest difference of night and day tempereture that close cities to sea, meanwhile closer cities to North than others.

Cities and distances to center of the North:

(http://1.1m.yt/Wn4zPml.png)

(http://1.1m.yt/zJGECP5.png)

(http://1.1m.yt/OEetuu6.png)

(http://1.1m.yt/WEMNr09.png)

(http://1.1m.yt/Z2Rky5y.png)

(http://1.1m.yt/hcETTQP.png)

(http://1.1m.yt/ej1L7d.png)

(http://1.1m.yt/cQdD9g.png)

(http://1.1m.yt/7yGbkwK.png)

(http://1.1m.yt/EIFwg4c.png)

(http://1.1m.yt/xwaLSQ0.png)

(http://1.1m.yt/beZKTwd.png)

(http://1.1m.yt/WMcckiW.png)

(http://1.1m.yt/j4dOcZ.png)

(http://1.1m.yt/3VOl64k.png)

(http://1.1m.yt/eJ6tjtc.png)

(http://1.1m.yt/2Uc-DZl.png)

(http://1.1m.yt/Wn4zPml.png)

(http://1.1m.yt/2iGmxT7.png)

(http://1.1m.yt/7kIwF88.png)

Weather temperature calculations:

1

(http://2.1m.yt/ShUNpqh.png)

(http://2.1m.yt/0-pMKJS.png)

2

(http://2.1m.yt/88UK2Q9.png)

(http://2.1m.yt/SDgcOsi.png)

3

(http://2.1m.yt/LQsgzd8.png)

(http://2.1m.yt/EdxilRI.png)

4

(http://2.1m.yt/exCK39R.png)

(http://2.1m.yt/zWGqdHE.png)

5

(http://2.1m.yt/Quf7L3.png)

(http://2.1m.yt/RnWFeF.png)

6

(http://4.1m.yt/yrxZOh4.png)

(http://4.1m.yt/klqh_0w.png)

7

(http://4.1m.yt/DpptDR5.png)

(http://4.1m.yt/GN_r8ri.png)

8

(http://4.1m.yt/vKN5eeC.png)

(http://4.1m.yt/HPVeJP.png)

9

(http://4.1m.yt/jhCPzA1.png)

(http://4.1m.yt/sTmeknB.png)

10

(http://4.1m.yt/KZysOw2.png)

(http://4.1m.yt/qi8vE6T.png)

11

(http://2.1m.yt/DzeNUG.png)

(http://2.1m.yt/HiO1W-p.png)

12

(http://2.1m.yt/ErCEp4.png)

(http://2.1m.yt/t1fcchN.png)

13

(http://2.1m.yt/h_l6KkT.png)

(http://2.1m.yt/5By8_HC.png)

14

No data

15

(http://2.1m.yt/ddtJ1qE.png)

(http://2.1m.yt/0RGinPg.png)

16

(http://2.1m.yt/WqjWe2E.png)

(http://2.1m.yt/yFiHoWq.png)

17

(http://2.1m.yt/Nzrx6Vw.png)

(http://2.1m.yt/uNej-Bm.png)

18

(http://2.1m.yt/98HZ7ZB.png)

(http://2.1m.yt/BHEA-jL.png)

19

(http://2.1m.yt/PASEIRo.png)

(http://2.1m.yt/N-HyJzV.png)

20

(http://2.1m.yt/U0QflhE.png)

(http://2.1m.yt/Br2cUxu.png)

And the results:

(http://3.1m.yt/tZPwxG.png)

(http://3.1m.yt/A1T0HkA.png)

(http://3.1m.yt/QH4jDzZ.png)

Specific examples.

The places near to sea are not different obviously. Because cities near the seas impressed by the temperate influence of the sea. So we'll choose some cities from North and south circle are far to sea and will examine them by differences of temperature night and day.

First lets all us look to map to find out ideal cities for see the difference obviously.

This is Australia map:

Almost all cities are placed on inshore except one: Alice Springs.

(http://3.1m.yt/tJMHSZo.png)

Lets measure it to sea:

(http://3.1m.yt/C--efbl.png)

Now we'll find out other cities has the distance to sea as 900 kms for compare it by objectivity.

Lets find another city in Southern circle:

(http://4.1m.yt/CFxmhct.png)

There are two cities seems like far to sea: Gaborone and Lusaka.

Lets measure them:

(http://3.1m.yt/iE-gGJV.png)

Gaborone has about 700 kms distance to sea. So it is not useful for our experiment.

Lets measure the other one:

(http://2.1m.yt/aR_-VCL.png)

864 kms. It is closed to 900 kms; so we selected Lusaka as a spesific city for our test.

Now we have two cities in Southern circle are far to sea about 860-900 kms. For compare them we need two other cities in Northern circle.

Lets look to North America.

(http://1.1m.yt/uqb5U7E.png)

I drawed there a line has 900 kms lenght for see about where will be stay the city which we can choose.

They seems like two cities to be possible about 900 kms to sea Edmonton and Winnipeg. Lets measure them are they true or not.

(http://4.1m.yt/Mu8cwBx.png)

We see these two cities on same image that both of them are useful for our test.

On. Now we selected 4 cities that 2 are from south and two are fron north and have distance about 900kms. Now we eliminated the factor of distance to sea.

Although we have 4 cities, we will be picking 2 new cities for North Asia and South America.

(http://1.1m.yt/HN88a6J.png)

(http://1.1m.yt/L8RUhdJ.png)

Brasilia and Novgorod are useful.

We have 6 cities that 3 from North and 3 from south and all of them are about 900 kms far to sea. We selected all of these cities by online, right here, right now.

Brasilia, Lusaka and Alice Springs from South America, South Africa and Australia which cities are far to sea about 900 kms;

Edmonton, Winnipeg and Novgorod from North America and Asia which cities are far to sea about 900 kms.

Lets do it.

This is final image:

there is a problem on upload site so i used another one.

At the end of the this working, all of 3 cities in the northern circle have lower day and night temperature differences than the cities on the south; which have same distance to the sea.

CITY /   PLACE / AVERAGE YEARLY TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCE
Novgorod     North   8,25
Edmonton    North   9,00
Winnipeg    North   10,17
Lusaka    South   10,33
Brasilia    South   11,25
Alice Springs    South   15,42

I'll add all of city data later.

Yet i added only data of January.

(http://i.imgsafe.org/b1271c216d.png)

(http://i.imgsafe.org/b12728d6db.png)

(http://i.imgsafe.org/b127327192.png)

(http://i.imgsafe.org/b12740e085.png)

(http://i.imgsafe.org/b1274ab3f4.png)

(http://i.imgsafe.org/b127540a6e.png)

imgsafe is not a safesite oppositely it's name . I'll change it later to another one. so i did'nt add all of images to it.

Silence is to approve.