The doctor says the technical term used alone doesn't mean much of anything.
No, he doesn't, and he proposes a term he'd consider more suitable for this specific case. I already quoted it for you. You could have read it.
Tom, the problem with you quote-mining is that the rest of the article, once again, completely disagrees with you. This is why you need to read the whole thing, not just fish for sentences that you think support your position.
Nobody dismisses his underlying health conditions. Indeed, he had many health issues which could kill him any moment, but didn't. However, all of your sources thus far agree that while his overall health was a contributing factor, the
cause was deemed to be homicide.
If you wanna keep doing that, meh, enjoy. But at least try to read the whole article next time. Find a source that doesn't immediately disprove your position. It's silly how much you've slipped recently.