markjo pointed out what he believes isn't credible, which happens to be in line with your thinking.
Obviously you missed that I was pointing out that I believe that you aren't credible, which I'm fairly sure falls in line with pretty much everyone else's thinking.
I know you aren't credible.
Come now, you can do better than "I know you are, but what am I?".
One always needs to consider the recipient(s) when contemplating effort.
"Don't cast pearls before the swine" comes to mind.
Knowing is better than believing.
Being able to provide evidence that supports what you "know" is better yet. Just calling Snopes unreliable isn't evidence of anything other than your own bias. Providing a link to a reliable source would be a step in the right direction.
I did provide evidence.
Offered in counter was a snopes "fact" check...HILARIOUS!
I didn't just call Snopes unreliable. Snopes has been proven to lie.