73 percent of ICU PATIENTS IN MASSACHUSETTS were double vaccinated.
Ok. Let’s say that number is correct.
To understand whether that is significant you have to know more than just that number.
How many people were in ICU? What is that 73% of?
And, most importantly, how many people have been vaccinated in that State and
which people have been vaccinated?
When they did clinical trials of the vaccine to assess its efficacy, they made sure the population of vaccinated vs unvaccinated people was identical, or as close as possible.
In real life for obvious reasons they’ve been vaccinating the most vulnerable people first. So you’re comparing two populations - vaccinated vs unvaccinated - with very different age and health profiles.
What percentage of vaccinated people get a pension vs unvaccinated? It’s likely to be quite high for the vaccinated group and low for the unvaccinated because it’s older people they vaccinated as a priority. That doesn’t mean the vaccine causes you to get a pension.
You’re getting excited about a number because you think it backs up your opinions, but you haven’t even tried to understand or analyse the number. It’s the US election all over again. Remember the “there’s no way these States could have swung, there’s a one in a bajillion chance” nonsense? That was making the same mistake. It was comparing the postal vote population with the on the day population. It was known before Election Day that those populations were very different in terms of how they were likely to vote so comparing them and expecting the split to be the same is erroneous.