1

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Disproofs - a summary of progress so far.

« on: November 25, 2017, 02:58:28 PM »

Math for spherical triangles.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SphericalTriangle.html

Math for equalateral triangle on a flat surface.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EquilateralTriangle.html

when comparired the two models a larger distance will be more accurate.

This will prove either FET or RET. You will just need to go the distance yourself.

'Its easy to claim something, but to prove it within your means, for some its just easier to ignore logic.'

2

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Speed of light

« on: November 25, 2017, 03:19:47 AM »

'Spatial Relativity is an interactive installation exploring how our bodies and minds can develop a dialogue with the surrounding environment. '

As individuals, 'we' singular - not as a group, attempt to convey an understanding of our understanding of what we percieve around us.  When I used 'spatial' in lou of special, I was not intoning special relativity was not a correct account. I meant that the discussion was about exploring our reality as we exist in it.

As for gravity, when something goes up it must come down. Every day the sun goes up and then it comes down. Simple gravity. (From a simple observational point not a literal point)

As for disproving 'UA' spatial relativity can do that.

Cheers.

Nonsense.  Voyager 1 (for example) "went up" - and for 100% sure it's ain't ever coming down again.

Did it really go up? Relative to my location it kinda went to the left. I'm sure by now its all down.

A man made contraption, can use things like fuel - to allow it to defy things like gravity.

There are a set of rules... physics that determine what you would need to be ably to not fall back to the ground, like for example helicopters.

I hope this is simple enough for you, and that you wont mistake a 'general' comment for some kind of sorcery again.

3

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Speed of light

« on: November 23, 2017, 09:53:56 PM »

'Spatial Relativity is an interactive installation exploring how our bodies and minds can develop a dialogue with the surrounding environment. '

As individuals, 'we' singular - not as a group, attempt to convey an understanding of our understanding of what we percieve around us.  When I used 'spatial' in lou of special, I was not intoning special relativity was not a correct account. I meant that the discussion was about exploring our reality as we exist in it.

As for gravity, when something goes up it must come down. Every day the sun goes up and then it comes down. Simple gravity. (From a simple observational point not a literal point)

As for disproving 'UA' spatial relativity can do that.

Cheers.

4

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Speed of light

« on: November 23, 2017, 10:43:53 AM »

I can't pretend to be well-read on Special relativity so I'll take your word for it. I'd still appreciate some explanation for the endless, mysterious force causing this constant acceleration of the entire universe before I'm fully convinced though!

Special relativity? Isn't this spatial relativity.