You have had your day (in fact, 7 x 365 days = 2555 days) all over the three FES boards: in fact, your own personal hypotheses became the law of the land for everybody else.
But your own findings, results, opinions, were debunked again and again...
Don't you think it's time to let someone else do a different job? Years ago, you should have had the courtesy to simply state: the 3000 mile altitude figure has been thoroughly debunked, please remove that data from the FAQ, I will try to come up with a better analysis.
But no such thing happened.
Can everybody understand what I am saying?
A theory has been proposed, which has failed, again and again, to explain anything purporting to the FES.
Some years ago, when I had the opportunity to actually modify the official FEFAQ, Wilmore removed my posts, and kindly informed me that these things just can't be done, everything has to stay the way it is (even though, the UA, the 3000 mile, 32 mile, ice wall, were debunked on a daily basis).
My Advanced Flat Earth Theory certainly has been tested again and again in countless debates, and won each time: why can't I have my results and findings posted in the FAQ?
I see that the pendulum was put in motion until its direction was affected by something external to it, perhaps by the celestial bodies, as suggested by the experimenter.It doesn't work like that, you should know better.
Dr. Maurice Allais:
During the eclipse, the pendulum took an unexpected turn, changing its angle of rotation by 13.5 degrees.How was the force transmitted from the heavenly body which caused the eclipse to the pendulum? Through what medium? What was that force which caused a sudden change in the angle of rotation by 13.5 degrees?
In the case of the anisotropic support, the amplitude of the luni-solar component of 24h 50m
is about twenty million times greater than the amplitude calculated by the theory of universal gravitation (pp. 118-129 and Table VII, p. 129).
No action at a distance is conceivable without the existence
of intermediary medium.
All known actions, gravitational, optical, electromagnetic,
propagate through a medium, the aether.
The attraction according to Newton's law of the inverse
square of the distance or Ampere's formulas are not actions at
a distance. They result from local actions which propagate
progressively across space through the aether.
Contrary to what was assumed in XIXth century and early XXth
century, the aether is subject to movements and local deformations,
in other words, the aether is an anisotropic medium. This anisotropy
varies over time and space.
The properties of the "vacuum" are nothing else than aether properties.
Dr. Erwin Saxl experiment (1970) (full details here:
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1629054#msg1629054 )
Saxl and Allen went on to note that to explain these remarkable eclipse observations, according to "conventional Newtonian/Einsteinian gravitational theory," an increase in the weight of the pendumum bob itself on the order of ~5% would be required ... amounting to (for the ~51.5-lb pendulum bob in the experiment) an increase of ~2.64 lbs!
This would be on the order of one hundred thousand (100,000) times greater than any possible "gravitational tidal effects"!
Let us now correlate these extraordinary findings with the DePalma and Kozyrev experiments.
Bruce DePalma graduated from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1958. He attended graduate school in Electrical Engineering and Physics at M.I.T. and Harvard University. At M.I.T. he was a lecturer in Photographic Science in the Laboratory of Dr. Harold Edgerton and directed 3-D color photographic research for Dr. Edwin Land of Polaroid Corporation.
He set up this experiment using two one-inch diameter pinball machine ball bearings where one was not spinning and one was made to spin at 18,000 rpm by a hand held router motor with cups to hold the balls, one on the spinning shaft and one affixed to the casing of the motor. He then he gave the assembly a thrust at an appropriate angle and in the dark with a 60 cycle strobe light and open camera lens he photographed the parallel trajectories of the two ball bearings. Repeating this numerous times and analyzing the photographs, this experiment showed that there is indeed a variation in the gravitational behavior of the spinning vs non-spinning ball bearing. The spinning ball, given the same thrust, went to a higher point in its trajectory, fell faster and hit the bottom of the trajectory before the non-spinning ball.
The results of the Spinning Ball Experiment were published in the British Scientific Research Association Journal in 1976. This experiment was also outlined personally by DePalma to Dr. Edward Purcell, one of the most eminent experimental physicists from Harvard at that time. According to DePalma, Purcell, after contemplating the experiment for several minutes, remarked "This will change everything."
Within a complete vacuum, DePalma took two steel balls and catapulted them into the air at equal angles, with an equal amount of force.
The only difference was that one ball was rotating 27,000 times per minute and the other was stationary. The rotating ball traveled higher into the air and then descended faster than its counterpart, which violated all known laws of physics.
The only explanation for this effect is that both balls are drawing energy into themselves from an unseen source, and the rotating ball is thus “soaking up” more of this energy than its counterpart – energy that would normally exist as gravity, moving down into the earth.
With the addition of torsion-field research we can see that the spinning ball was able to harness naturally spiraling torsion waves in its environment, which gave it an additional supply of energy.Can you now understand? Laevorotatory torsion waves were harnessed/attracted by the high torsion/rotational movement and caused the antigravitational effect: left to its own devices, the ball with no torsion was subjected to the dextrorotatory wave effect, that is, terrestrial gravity.
A ball spinning at 27,000 RPM and a non-spinning ball were catapulted side-by-side with equal momentum and projection angle. In defiance of all who reject the ether as unrealistic, the spinning ball actually weighed less, and traveled higher than its non-spinning counterpart. Those who attribute this to an aerodynamic or atmospheric effect, please note that it works just as well in a vacuum. Also note, this effect has since been verified by other [enlightened] researchers. The decrease in weight of the spinning ball - anti-gravity - can explain why the spinning object goes higher and falls faster than the identical non-rotating control. Current thinking is that there is no special interaction between rotation and gravity. The behavior of rotating objects is simply the addition of ether energy to whatever motion the rotating object is making.
ETHER PHYSICS MAKES SUPERFLUOUS ANY NEED FOR AN OUTLANDISH EXPLANATION LIKE THE UA.
Dr. Nikolai Kozyrev, the greatest astrophysicist of the 20th century.
Dr Kozyrev's experiments began in the 1950s and were conducted since the 1970s with the ongoing assistance of Dr V. V. Nasonov, who helped to standardise the laboratory methods and the statistical analysis of the results. Detectors using rotation and vibration were specially designed and made that would react in the presence of torsion fields, which Kozyrev called the "flow of time".
It is important to remember that these experiments were conducted under the strictest conditions, repeated in hundreds or in many cases thousands of trials and were written about in extensive mathematical detail. They have been rigorously peer-reviewed, and Lavrentyev and others have replicated the results independently.
According to the theory developed by N.A.Kozyrev, time and rotation are closely interconnected. In order to verify his theory, N.A.Kozyrev conducted a series of experiments with spinning gyroscopes. The goal of these experiments was to make a measurement of the forces arising while the gyroscope was spinning. N.A.Kozyrev detected that the weight of the spinning gyroscope changes slightly depending on the angular velocity and the direction of rotation.
We do not need to provide an answer for what pushes the earth upwards. Why would we? How an why are beyond scope. The earth is observed to accelerate upwards, and so that is what it does. Whatever is pushing it up does not be explained before an emperical conclusion can be drawn.But you do, and a thorough one.
To explain terrestrial gravity by assuming that the Earth is moving upwards is an outlandish supposition, at best, which needs to be proven, to have a supporting theory, which your nebulous posts never provided.
The earth is NOT observed to accelerate upwards, that is your OWN unproven conclusion. I have provided a much better explanation for the law of acceleration in the context of ether physics, please remember.
What pushes it up is of total interest since you have never provided any kind of an explanation (religious, philosophical, scientific) for this: and this is the least of your worries, the UA has been debunked over 100 times in the upper forums.
What has not been shown is how a particle can pull. How can a particle or pull another particle? That doesn't make sense.Exactly: the pulling mechanism has never been explained, nor can it be explained by mainstream science.
But how does this warrant a science fiction hypothesis, that the Earth is moving upwards to explain away terrestrial gravitation?
There has been no demonstration of waves, particles, or bending space as being the mechanism for gravity. Where is the evidence that these "waves," or whatever you are proposing, exists? I can see, simply, that the earth is accelerating upwards. I just need to step off the edge of my chair. Where is the empirical evidence for your proposed mechanism? But there is, plenty of it that the pressure of certain waves does cause terrestrial gravity, and this has everything to do with torsion.
Here is the evidence.
"The effect [of ether-drift] has persisted throughout. After considering all the possible sources of error, there always remained a positive effect." Dayton Miller (1928, p.399)
http://www.orgonelab.org/miller.htmDayton Miller's 1933 paper in Reviews of Modern Physics details the positive results from over 20 years of experimental research into the question of ether-drift, and remains the most definitive body of work on the subject of light-beam interferometry.
As a graduate of physics from Princeton University, President of the American Physical Society and Acoustical Society of America, Chairman of the Division of Physical Sciences of the National Research Council, Chairman of the Physics Department of Case School of Applied Science (today Case Western Reserve University), and Member of the National Academy of Sciences well known for his work in acoustics, Miller was no "outsider". While he was alive, he produced a series of papers presenting solid data on the existence of a measurable ether-drift, and he successfully defended his findings to not a small number of critics, including Einstein.
Miller's observations were also consistent through the long period of his measurements. He noted, when his data were plotted on sidereal time, they produced "...a very striking consistency of their principal characteristics...for azimuth and magnitude... as though they were related to a common cause... The observed effect is dependent upon sidereal time and is independent of diurnal and seasonal changes of temperature and other terrestrial causes, and...is a cosmical phenomenon." (Miller 1933, p.231)
THE LAMOREAUX EFFECT
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1616174#msg1616174#t=0
starts at 9:31 (negative energy and pressure gravity experiment)
The zero-point fluctuations of free space won't fit between those plates, as well, so when you bring these two plates together, there are fewer fluctuations between the plates than there are outside the plates.
The force builds up, and it actually gets stronger and stronger as the plates get closer together, and that force we refer to as arising from negative energy.
The zero-point energy fluctuations outside the plates are stronger than those between, so pressure from the outside pushes them together.
Or think of it another way.
The negative energy between the plates expands space around it.
Steve's years of meticulous labor have made him the first person on Earth to have measured a force produced by negative energy.
DR. T. HENRY MORAY: THE DISCOVERY OF ETHER WAVES:
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1707569#msg1707569If you cannot provide evidence for your mechanism which is equally empirical, then how can you expect us to abandon a mechanism which is so obvious and apparent?I have just provided ample proofs that terrestrial gravity has everything to do with ether waves, and not UA.
You are way too generous with words: your UA has been, for all these years, ANYTHING but obvious and apparent.
Next time we meet, you will be treated (fully) with the Biefeld-Brown effect.
Show Posts
