Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Alchemist21

Pages: < Back  1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 11  Next >
81
Technology & Information / Error Code Purple
« on: January 04, 2014, 12:18:05 AM »
Does anyone know how to fix error code purple?  The cpu's been bricked so long I can't remember if it's a windows 7 or a vista, but I'm sure it's one of the two. 

82
Suggestions & Concerns / Ignore Button
« on: January 03, 2014, 05:29:20 PM »
You know how when you click on someone's profile it has the add to buddy list on it?  Can we get an add to ignore list button below that?

83
Suggestions & Concerns / Re: CN page numbers
« on: January 03, 2014, 04:36:52 PM »
It wasn't just your eyes, Jroa.  They all looked the same color to me too.

84
Science & Alternative Science / Re: My Simulation Hypothesis
« on: January 03, 2014, 04:33:44 PM »
This isn't the first time I'v eheard the suggestion that we are part of a simulation.  Some scientists see evidence that the universe may be a complex computer simulation based on the pixelated appearance of subatomic particles.

85
Suggestions & Concerns / Re: Previous/next page buttons please
« on: January 01, 2014, 05:54:58 PM »
Keep the GoUp button.  It saves a lot of finger scrolling to get back to the unread replies button, especially when the thread is full of wall texts.

86
Flat Earth Theory / Re: Is it possible to prove a negative?
« on: December 30, 2013, 08:20:14 PM »
ITT: People argue about how to argue.

87
Science & Alternative Science / Re: Erich von Daniken
« on: December 30, 2013, 08:07:54 PM »
I think if aliens visited Earth in the past, it wasn't to build monuments or mate with humans, but to obtain resources.  How they got here would be a mystery, but scientists are theorizing ways in which interstellar travel could be achieved, the most recent I've heard of involves forming a bubble of what they call negative energy around the ship which would essentially compress time-space in front of the ship.  The comparison they use is that it would be like having to travel the diameter of a pizza, but you get to cut out a strip of pizza perpendicular to the diameter.  The problem with such a method is the immense amount of energy required to create a bubble of negative energy.  Nobody is sure how that would be achieved.

88
Announcements / Re: New BBCode
« on: December 30, 2013, 06:43:38 PM »
FES

This is a test.

EDIT:  Safari doesn't even show it differently.

89
Arts & Entertainment / Re: The FES Books
« on: December 30, 2013, 04:57:40 AM »
There's a lit page in the wiki for keeping up with FES lit.  I transferred material from Tom's thread to it, so you could just add on to that list.

90
Announcements / Re: New BBCode
« on: December 30, 2013, 03:21:33 AM »
What's the point of the abbreviation tag?  Why would anyone choose that over just typing the abbreviation themselves?

91
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Police body cameras
« on: December 29, 2013, 03:47:53 PM »
What purpose would the always-on gps serve?

92
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Kahlil Gibran
« on: December 28, 2013, 11:47:43 PM »
This isn't going to be another thread like the Erich von Daineken thread is it?

93
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: What Religion are you?
« on: December 26, 2013, 11:00:12 PM »
Well, the Sun was literally Day 1 in Genesis, so. . .

94
In the Bible a lot of acts listed as sins are done by God himself at some point.  I believe in the Biblical God, but I think the people who wrote the Bible made up a lot of stuff about him.

95
The Bible actually quotes God as calling Himself jealous, so yeah, there's an insecurity with the Fundamental idea of God.

96
Suggestions & Concerns / Re: Spambot Alert Thread
« on: December 25, 2013, 06:17:08 PM »
Ok.  I was just planning for future cases if you guys ever went with something more automated in account creation.

97
Suggestions & Concerns / Re: Spambot Alert Thread
« on: December 25, 2013, 04:48:55 AM »
If we find soambots on the wiki do we report them here too?

98
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Proofs from EJ.
« on: December 23, 2013, 02:25:02 AM »
I think therefor I am.  I am not your imagination, Tausami.  Now prove that you are not mine.

99
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Proofs from EJ.
« on: December 23, 2013, 12:13:30 AM »
For Christmas time the banlist should be called the Naughty List.

100
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: What Religion are you?
« on: December 21, 2013, 08:38:59 AM »
I define predictable as "without randomness". If something is unpredictable, that means there is randomness involved. It might not be practical to try and make predictions in a chaotic system, but even chaotic systems follow laws.

Well I think you're one of the few who defines it that way (in a mathematical sense).

You can predict the probability of certain events occurring and given a large enough system in time or space, you can assert that an event is statistically certain to take place.  This is the type of prediction I maintain could be made about the spontaneous creation of the universe.  As Roundy passive aggressively pointed out, there would be no one around to make the prediction, but as a metaphysical possibility I think it stands that predicting a probable outcome, and given a system that makes the occurrence a statistical likelihood, renders it non-accidental.  This might degenerate in to a semantic discussion of accidental, which is fine, I just wanted to clarify my original point.

My problem was with the fact that you need a set of laws to predict a possible set of outcomes.

You can still have a set of laws but you will never be able to predict the outcome, quantum mechanics is a prime example. I can't argue that you could give a probable outcome but that doesn't mean it's not an accident. A nuclear power station has a probability of blowing up but I would say it's an accident if it did.

Also what happens if our type of universe that came into being had an equal but remote possibility of being created as any other universes or non-existence? Is it an accident then?

What determines that probability? I would argue that in order to know that probability you would need to be independent of the universe itself, because anything you measure or interact with within the universe will influence the outcome and the probability you're trying to measure (which is shown to be the case in quantum mechanics).

I can't see how you can say the universe was created by accident or vice versa.

Follow the quote link.  This was the last on-topic post.

Pages: < Back  1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 11  Next >