think there is a general consensus of, let's say, what countries border each other.
I disagree. On the other forums someone was making a map of the earth only based on Northern Hemisphere flights. I would not agree with his continental configuration.
There were also several members who adhered to a more biblical flat disk model where Jerusalem was a the center of the flat disk which was at the center of the universe. I would not agree with their continental configurations.
Furthermore there is this great ice wall thing. Does it exist? In my FE model it does not exist. Some models it does not, and some models the ice wall is an unknown.
Yes, but none of them work, they are not accurate and suffer all the same problems that creating an accurate flat earth map tries to solve.
I'm painfully aware of the flight time map. It's north pole centered. It doesn't account for taxiing or delays. The criteria for a flight to be valid is vague at best. For instance if a flight doesn't fit on the model, no matter the evidence for the flight existing, it is discarded as being fake. Which is, well, backwards at best.
Ice wall doesn't really matter. Other than the fact that in some cases Antarctica exists as we know it and in other cases Antarctica
is the icewall. But that's not so much of a burning issue.
I don't know much about the Jerusalem centered map, but I assume it just centers on the city instead of the north pole and runs into all of the same problems as the AE map does.
I say that most have the countries next to the right countries continent-ally speaking because if you lift any of the continents up and off of, let's say the AE map and just laid them down again, their forms are somewhat correct: