Recent Posts
Maybe, but I am sure they would be more capable than you.The topic is abortion, not miscarriage.
Do you think those in the state legislatures can reliably tell the difference? Have they all accounted for it in their lawmaking?
The hearsay is being confirmed by multiple sources within Secret Service, by footage of Trump in the vehicle.Oh, you have seen the footage...BWAHAHA!!!
He could have got out and walked there by himself, couldn't he? Oh, no, I forgot; he can't walk that far, and needs a golf cart to get around.
And like I said earlier, if the facts are in dispute, he can volunteer to testify, under oath, to set the record straight, can't he?
I vote for changing the term "miscarriage" to "died of natural causes." To call it miscarriage is to pretend like they weren't a fully realized human with hopes and dreams and I just think that's sick. We don't say Jane Doe died of miscarriage at the age of 95!
Listen bullwinkle.funny, where are the judges asking the questions in this matter?That is still hearsay.
No, it's not. Try to follow...
Case 1QuoteLawer1: "Did Mr. X get into his car the night of the rape?"
Witness: "He said he did."
Lawer2: "Objection, hearsay!"
Judge: "Objection sustained."
Case 2QuoteLawer1: "Did Mr. X tell you personally that he got into his car the night of the rape?"
Witness: "Yes, he did."
Lawer2: "Objection, hearsay!"
Judge: "Objection overruled."
There go your reading skills again. No the judges are ruling on the procedure (obviously).It is hearsay.No, It's not.
Hearsay is when a witness relates a conversation with another person who is outside the court (not there, not called, otherwise unavailable) in support of evidence or other matter before the court. Like in case1 above.
I will say something for you, you are consistent.
Hutchinson can say whatever she wants, wherever she wants.That is still hearsay.She testified as to what she heard...aka HEARSAY.Unless that was the evidence she was asked to testify on and that she heard it firsthand.
If she is describing someone's recollection of an event, then it is still admissible.Rule 803. Hearsay Exceptions; Availability of Declarant Immaterial
The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule, even though the declarant is available as a witness:
(1) Present sense impression. A statement describing or explaining an event or condition made while the declarant was perceiving the event or condition, or immediately thereafter.
It doesn't matter what I believe about your post.Again, the topic is abortion, not conception.And you believe that conception immediately equals personhood?I refer you back to the topic of abortion.
Abortion takes place at a time after conception.
When does a pregnancy start?
The start of pregnancy is actually the first day of your last menstrual period. This is called the gestational age, or menstrual age. It’s about two weeks ahead of when conception actually occurs. Though it may seem strange, the date of the first day of your last period will be an important date when determining your due date. Your healthcare provider will ask you about this date and will use it to figure out how far along you are in your pregnancy.
What happens right after conception?
Within 24 hours after fertilization, the egg begins rapidly dividing into many cells. It remains in the fallopian tube for about three days after conception. Then the fertilized egg (now called a blastocyte) continues to divide as it passes slowly through the fallopian tube to the uterus. Once there, its next job is to attach to the endometrium. This is called implantation.
Within three weeks, the blastocyte cells ultimately form a little ball, or an embryo. By this time, the first nerve cells have formed.
So do you believe a blastocyte is a person and a potential victim if an abortion occurs at this stage, post-conception, pre-embryo?
Correct. And here's a question about abortion, the topic: Do you believe a blastocyte is a person and a potential victim if an abortion occurs at this stage, post-conception, pre-embryo?
I find it interesting you provide a source that fails to support your claim in any way whatsoever.The topic is abortion, not miscarriage.But women are being arrested for miscarriages too.
https://www.11alive.com/article/news/national/miscarriages-are-already-criminalized-roe-v-wade/85-7e78facf-b673-4775-8a09-9a45e3a794b2
