1

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Found a fully working flat earth model?

« on: June 07, 2022, 12:04:17 AM »

For the sake of clarity: Do you think the OP is suggesting they are showing us a Euclidean space FE in this thread?

2

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Scales on Maps

« on: June 06, 2022, 11:01:52 PM »

You are wrong, now you know. I mean, he said as much, so you could have just read what he wrote, but I'm happy to tell you too.

The other physicists and mathematicians he works with commented on it before he posted it here. He wrote about that, too, in the very same thread. You could have read that for yourself. But you didn't.

Maybe leave your instinctive desire to bash anything that looks strange to you behind and reread what he wrote? It's a RE, expressed in a way that looks new and scary, but it's window dressing. He took your favorite planet and gave it a new look. Same shape, same physics, now being sold in new packaging.

3

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Scales on Maps

« on: June 06, 2022, 06:44:58 PM »

In another thread, Troolon explained to me that measurement is broken. His attitude towards the same question was that when real world measurements do not match FE, one concludes that measurement is broken. Most would conclude that real world measurements confirm RE. If you wish to believe FE, something has to give, so measurement is broken. Result you don't like? Declare it wrong. No idea what forces or equations account for broken measurement? No problem. Only RE explains measurement? Just ignore the problem, i.e., don't reply.

You continue to demonstrate that you haven't understood a single thing Troolon wrote. Across 2 threads, simultaneously. Telling you that you are misinterpreting what he presented is not the same as telling you that measurement is broken.

4

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Found a fully working flat earth model?

« on: June 04, 2022, 10:59:17 PM »

It's literally a RE but ok

5

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Terrible Political Memes

« on: May 31, 2022, 08:52:49 PM »

Not sure if Truth Social does things differently, but those images loaded fine for me and they were not in my cache.

Anyway, here's a meme

6

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden

« on: May 31, 2022, 08:19:40 PM »

They're rational, but they're cynical to the core and have long since abandoned their principles in favor of grasping at power wherever they can at the expense of our democracy. They can't be trusted, and making any sort of plan that relies on their help or cooperation is guaranteed to backfire.

And they say the same about Democrats.

Remember when Democrats negotiated on Obamacare in good faith, caving to Republican demands even though they had the votes to put through something truly differentiating like Universal Health Care if they wanted to, only to find that not a single Republican voted in favor of it despite the fact that it was a near-replication of Romneycare? So they can say what you are saying they will say, but they would be wrong. Democrats have been much better about negotiating in good faith than Republicans for most of my adult life. They are just shit at actually enacting anything of substance, usually because they campaign on the lofty goals, then whittle away at those to appease Republican legislators when courting votes, then don't get a single Republican to actually side with them (or sometimes, a single-digit number of Republicans might side with them), then lose power because they didn't accomplish what they set out to do.

7

Suggestions & Concerns / Re: Attachments

« on: May 26, 2022, 08:45:53 PM »

That can happen with the attachments folder during a forum update, too. Nothing is permanent. I'm more of a mind that allowing attachments introduces unnecessary vectors for problems, and they should probably be disabled entirely. Having your images hosted with an image hosting service seems like a better home, and it allows the forum to operate with a lighter footprint on its own host.

8

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Moon landing hoax question

« on: May 26, 2022, 06:49:30 PM »

So you're changing your argument then? Because initially, it was that FE can't make a single prediction about the moon, remember? Now that you've been asked to actually try and defend that laughably wrong statement, you want to move the goalposts to someplace more comfortable?

I dare to say that despite pretending to know so much about the moon and the hoaxes surrounding it, flat Earthers cannot make a single prediction about the moon. Am I wrong?

9

Suggestions & Concerns / Re: Attachments

« on: May 26, 2022, 04:35:54 PM »

Why would you upload a jpeg when places like ImgBB exist? Seems wasteful to take up hosting space for people to upload image files here, when so many hosting sites already exist that are purpose built for serving up images.

10

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Moon landing hoax question

« on: May 24, 2022, 09:32:44 PM »

I dare to say that despite pretending to know so much about the moon and the hoaxes surrounding it, flat Earthers cannot make a single prediction about the moon. Am I wrong?

You think a group of people could keep track of the behavior of the moon over a period of months or years and not be able to make a single prediction about its behavior? I dare to say I don't think you are actually using your head at all if you'd suggest such a thing. Anyone can take notes on the cycles of waxing and waning and look for patterns that repeat.

11

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Bye Bye Abortion

« on: May 19, 2022, 11:31:55 PM »

Oh I agree.
But if a guy says "It's ok, I'm on the pill" would you really wanna trust him?  I sure as hell wouldn't.

Society has to get better at teaching guys not to sexually assault people. If you lie about being on birth control and subsequently impregnate someone, I'm pretty sure that checks the sexual assault boxes.

It also doesn't have to be an exclusionary choice. Condoms AND a pill for men AND a pill for women is a great way for everyone to stay safe, have fun, avoid diseases, and not make surprise babies. "And" is ok, maybe even great. "Or" leaves a lot of room for human error, malice, and in-the-moment selfishness to cause long lasting life changes.

12

Arts & Entertainment / Re: Now Playing (the Video Game Version)

« on: May 10, 2022, 12:59:32 PM »

I have ascended to Elden Lord finally. The final run of bosses at the end is not for the faint of heart. And there's a bad bitch that I have yet to slay and continues to have never known defeat. Which is to say, I'm not nearly done with this game yet.

13

Flat Earth Theory / Re: New Star Map

« on: May 08, 2022, 05:47:39 PM »

Ships sailing north from different lines of latitude converge toward each other. They don't get further away from each other. That is the reality modern navigation has revealed to us. Leaving the discussion of rotated constellations behind (because it is definitely unresolved), you don't account for converging paths as people move north from various longitudes.

The courses of two ships would converge on a Northbound voyage assuming that they are both North of the equator. If they were South of the equator the courses would continue to diverge until they reached the equator.

Sure. I mean, I felt like that went without saying, but I guess it's worth pointing out. I was speaking from a Northern Hemisphere Supremacist perspective and that's probably not ideal.

14

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Found a fully working flat earth model?

« on: May 04, 2022, 12:47:16 AM »

OP does not consider it a FE model. Try reading. If it doesn't work the first time, try again. He said more then once that it's still the globe. Other physicists reviewed it and said it's a globe (also, that's why it's "practically useless" - because using this framework is really impractical when you could use the actual globe). If you spend a few cycles pondering the implications of everything troolon described, it's obviously still a globe. But people get so hung up on fighting against a perceived enemy that it doesn't even matter what is actually being said.

Go ahead though. Tell us all how wrong it is, and how it can't possibly describe reality as we observe it, despite matching observations because it's, you know, the actual fucking globe and stars just illustrated in a way that looks scary and foreign and so, obviously, it must be bad.

15

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Found a fully working flat earth model?

« on: May 01, 2022, 11:53:38 PM »

This is what I meant when I said you two hadn't actually read his posts. It's exactly the globe, expressed in a coordinate system that looks different without being different. The fact anyone is still suggesting the lines of longitude are diverging between the equator and either one of the poles in this thing he shared with us is clear evidence that the people making said suggestion haven't bothered paying any attention, yet they are still here to broadcast their ignorance and laziness for all to see while declaring some sort of weird victory. It's pigeons and chess.

16

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Found a fully working flat earth model?

« on: April 30, 2022, 12:31:58 PM »

Great work, guys. You successfully demonstrated exactly what I said. Sort of, actually. Existoid read without comprehension, so that's at least more than was apparent before.

Every coordinate in 3D space is directly mapped from a single point on the globe to a single point on troolon's FE. It's a globe. Anyone standing on the surface of the Earth would perceive it to be a globe, which has converging lines of longitude at both poles.

But by all means, continue attacking this representation of the globe, expressed in a scary foreign coordinate system.

17

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Found a fully working flat earth model?

« on: April 29, 2022, 09:04:04 PM »

Looks like neither of you read what OP has been writing. If you spend a few minutes actually reading, instead of knee-jerk reacting to yell "NO, FE BAD", you may just discover that the model is quite literally still the same model as the globe. Because it is still the globe model. OP spent a lot of time responding very clearly, and was very patient, and it's clear the folks that have had the most vocal opposition aren't even showing the slightest bit of respect by reading what they have written.

OP did not contend with the divergence of longitude

Yes. Yes, he did.

My argument is a little more sophisticated than "NO, FE BAD" thank you very much.

It might have been, had you actually read what OP was proposing. This is still a globe, and those lines converge using the correct distance metric.

18

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Found a fully working flat earth model?

« on: April 29, 2022, 08:31:03 PM »

Looks like neither of you read what OP has been writing. If you spend a few minutes actually reading, instead of knee-jerk reacting to yell "NO, FE BAD", you may just discover that the model is quite literally still the same model as the globe. Because it is still the globe model. OP spent a lot of time responding very clearly, and was very patient, and it's clear the folks that have had the most vocal opposition aren't even showing the slightest bit of respect by reading what they have written.

19

Suggestions & Concerns / Re: Let's use the site-wide theme in CN

« on: April 29, 2022, 02:26:08 PM »

Thanks. There's still a lot to be done, it's not nearly ready, but it's a good start.

20

Suggestions & Concerns / Re: Let's use the site-wide theme in CN

« on: April 29, 2022, 02:19:52 PM »

Don't you dare change the CN theme you cultureless heathens.

 

Hear me out though...